Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-20-2015, 03:17 PM
 
188 posts, read 177,787 times
Reputation: 139

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by fourthwarden View Post
Careful now, just because someone doesn't prefer one mode in a location, doesn't mean they don't like that mode in another location entirely.

BRT and Streetcar / LRT each have a place here.
For $100 million, you could've had a system of of the newest buses available running all through downtown providing much greater connectivity. Done correctly, it would've spurred investment as well as creating a viable transportation solution rather than a streetcar to nowhere that is so poorly manage that it still can't even charge customers for usage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-20-2015, 03:19 PM
 
188 posts, read 177,787 times
Reputation: 139
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
The Streetcar is a 1st piece of the streetcar network, that has to have a cross-downtown line. Also, Auburn Ave is already served by bus and the ridership is low in that corridor. Also, first time riders are more reluctant to ride a bus. Finally, the streetcar was also an economic tool that is now proving to work as more than $1B of investment has been built or planned projects.
You act as though without the streetcar, development would not have occurred. Put a nice busway through the area with dedicated ROW and stops like Cleveland did and you would've seen similar results at a fraction of the cost. Also, without either of these, some development would've still occurred. Some would've occurred along the route and some would've occurred elsewhere. Using $100 million in transportation funding as an economic development tool to steer development to less desirable locations is foolish. Use transportation money to solve transportation problems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2015, 03:53 PM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
9,829 posts, read 7,267,247 times
Reputation: 7790
The streetcar makes enough sense in Downtown, Midtown, and definitely around the Beltline (where you can't do a BRT.) It'll be a lot better when they make needed speed improvements, like traffic light priority at the least.

Buckhead can do a BRT for the underserved Peachtree Rd corridor, if that works better for them. Or at least a limited stop rapid bus.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2015, 04:47 PM
 
188 posts, read 177,787 times
Reputation: 139
Quote:
Originally Posted by primaltech View Post
The streetcar makes enough sense in Downtown, Midtown, and definitely around the Beltline (where you can't do a BRT.) It'll be a lot better when they make needed speed improvements, like traffic light priority at the least.

Buckhead can do a BRT for the underserved Peachtree Rd corridor, if that works better for them. Or at least a limited stop rapid bus.
What is the difference between streetcars and buses downtown when they both aren't run on dedicated ROW? Get a nice new articulated streetcar and you almost match the capacity of the streetcar. It isn't like capacity is an issue either with the low ridership numbers the route generates. You could've put up nice stops with shelters and nice markings along the current route and run buses for pennies on the dollar of the streetcar. Heck, for a little bit more, you could've given the bus it's own lane. This would've been faster than the streetcar and still cost a lot less. Buses could be run anywhere that the streetcar could run. It could be done for less. I'm in favor of more extensive, efficient transit, not just very limited luxury transit that doesn't solve transportation problems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2015, 11:51 PM
 
Location: Prescott, AZ
5,559 posts, read 4,696,314 times
Reputation: 2284
This is not a thread about the downtown streetcar. Take your complaints and opinions on it to one of the many threads already dedicated to it. This thread is about Northside-Drive.

So anyway, I know Cumberland isn't in the MARTA service area, and I know Cobb isn't too open to MARTA, but I bet the CID would pitch in for the route to end at the Cumberland Transfer center, maybe even helping a bit with getting the roads around there set up for bus lanes.

As for West End to Vine City, there're a few buildings along the route, but most of the curb-side stuff is parking lots and even open lots from West End to where Northside splits off W. Whitehall from what I can see. After that, Northside is 3 Lanes, with what looks to be enough room on either side to add a bus / streetcar lane if you dig into a bit of people's yards and the vacant lots.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2015, 02:21 AM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
9,829 posts, read 7,267,247 times
Reputation: 7790
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirkMcGirt View Post
What is the difference between streetcars and buses downtown when they both aren't run on dedicated ROW? Get a nice new articulated streetcar and you almost match the capacity of the streetcar. It isn't like capacity is an issue either with the low ridership numbers the route generates. You could've put up nice stops with shelters and nice markings along the current route and run buses for pennies on the dollar of the streetcar. Heck, for a little bit more, you could've given the bus it's own lane. This would've been faster than the streetcar and still cost a lot less. Buses could be run anywhere that the streetcar could run. It could be done for less. I'm in favor of more extensive, efficient transit, not just very limited luxury transit that doesn't solve transportation problems.
Anybody can non-productively second guess anything past tense, and be entirely negative, which is I guess all you contribute around here? S70 rail vehicles were chosen by city officials and beltline officials, as the future transit plan for the city, which could tie in the beltline with the street corridors. So let's embrace that, figure out how to improve it. Because I am also a huge critic of the current streetcar in many ways, but I also see its potential of at least what it could be.

If you're suggesting abandon the streetcar, at this point that's ridiculous. The streetcar exists already, and it's going to serve the transit for the city, and has the distinct advantage of also serving the Beltline. That's the plan. Let's expand it and use it as best as possible. Take advantage of what it offers. Take a more positive outlook, quit it with all the second guessing and negativity. Make constructive and productive criticisms.

I am a big fan of the potential of buses, too. And they are indeed the best raw people moving bang for buck. Let's have MARTA run high frequency, high capacity, limited stop rapid bus routes, for all non-streetcar corridors, and for the quieter parts of Atlanta, and suburbs outside of the city limits. Heck, replace all local routes with rapid routes. And regardless of surface rail or bus, let's get some traffic signal syncing, and transit lanes.

Anyway, Northside Dr needs to be a complete street, with lanes for cars, lanes for transit, and lanes for bikes. And with good sidewalks and crosswalks. Ditto for every other major street and road around town.

You start out with that solid public infrastructure, then new private development can complement it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2015, 03:40 AM
 
Location: Atlanta's Castleberry Hill
4,768 posts, read 5,443,661 times
Reputation: 5161
Sorry but Historic West End residents don't want to be the avenue for the new stadium people to access the interstate through our beautiful neighborhood. Those dummies at the Georgia Department of Transportation should have been smarter at planning and building the connector. West End don't want to cater to a bunch of surburban brats that don't even live in Atlanta.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2015, 04:57 AM
 
Location: Georgia
1,512 posts, read 1,963,711 times
Reputation: 1200
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlwarrior View Post
Sorry but Historic West End residents don't want to be the avenue for the new stadium people to access the interstate through our beautiful neighborhood. Those dummies at the Georgia Department of Transportation should have been smarter at planning and building the connector. West End don't want to cater to a bunch of surburban brats that don't even live in Atlanta.
I don't really see how this would effect the West End at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2015, 05:15 AM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,876,648 times
Reputation: 5703
Quote:
Originally Posted by DirkMcGirt View Post
For $100 million, you could've had a system of of the newest buses available running all through downtown providing much greater connectivity. Done correctly, it would've spurred investment as well as creating a viable transportation solution rather than a streetcar to nowhere that is so poorly manage that it still can't even charge customers for usage.
Guess, what MARTA has a fleet of the newest buses running thru downtown providing connectivity. Still do not see many demand riders on the bus.
Welcome to New Flyer!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-21-2015, 06:24 AM
 
Location: NW Atlanta
6,503 posts, read 6,124,067 times
Reputation: 4463
Quote:
Originally Posted by alco89 View Post
I don't really see how this would effect the West End at all.
Yeah, West End is on the other side of I-20 from MBS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:55 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top