Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-26-2013, 02:14 PM
 
Location: North Austin
217 posts, read 328,044 times
Reputation: 144

Advertisements

Does anybody have a good idea how much water we have left? Does anyone think it could happen? I have a small pond out back and it's doing a lot better than Lake Travis right now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-26-2013, 02:21 PM
 
593 posts, read 470,434 times
Reputation: 95
My friend studied Biology did a dive at the edge of the Dam and it's welll over 100+ feet. they only dove 60+. So my guess is it will never "dry up"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2013, 02:31 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,269 posts, read 35,642,308 times
Reputation: 8617
The lake is at 38% capacity right now. As the lake goes lower, more restrictions kick in, so it will take a lot longer to 'lose' the next 38% than it took to loose the 38% before now. Well, the combined storage of Buchanan and Travis is at 38%, don't really know if one is at 40 and the other at 36, etc. Anyway, there is several years to go even under drought conditions, but I would not be terribly surprised to see us hit a new record low by the end of the summer....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2013, 02:38 PM
 
3,079 posts, read 3,265,478 times
Reputation: 2509
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainwreck20 View Post
The lake is at 38% capacity right now. As the lake goes lower, more restrictions kick in, so it will take a lot longer to 'lose' the next 38% than it took to loose the 38% before now. Well, the combined storage of Buchanan and Travis is at 38%, don't really know if one is at 40 and the other at 36, etc. Anyway, there is several years to go even under drought conditions, but I would not be terribly surprised to see us hit a new record low by the end of the summer....
Wait, is the lake 38% below capacity or is it at 38% of capacity (in which case it's lost 62%)? If it's the latter then that "next" 38% will make 100%, unless of course you're referring to losing 38% of current capacity, in which case it may not be slower at all since 38% of 38% is significantly smaller in terms of absolute volume.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2013, 02:41 PM
 
Location: North Austin
217 posts, read 328,044 times
Reputation: 144
There are a lot of straws in the aquifer right now. Property owners with wells I'm sure are contributing to the lowering lake levels.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2013, 02:41 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,269 posts, read 35,642,308 times
Reputation: 8617
The 38% is current volume of water supply left, not lake level, so the rate of change in percent capacity is directly proportional to addition - (usage+loss). I am saying that while it essentially took 3 years to go from 76% to 38%, the rice farming is not cutoff and, if it continues to drop, additional restrictions will be put in place that will make it take longer than three years to get to 0%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2013, 02:43 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,269 posts, read 35,642,308 times
Reputation: 8617
Quote:
There are a lot of straws in the aquifer right now. Property owners with wells I'm sure are contributing to the lowering lake levels.
The wells, probably not so much. The flow through the lakes into the aquifer is miniscule, so the change in hydraulic pressure from lowering the water table will have almost no impact.

There are also people pumping directly out of the lake itself, though, and while the total volume is probably not that much and there has been sparring in the past, I suspect that issue may raise itself again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2013, 02:44 PM
 
10,130 posts, read 19,882,004 times
Reputation: 5815
Quote:
Originally Posted by austinnerd View Post
Wait, is the lake 38% below capacity or is it at 38% of capacity (in which case it's lost 62%)? If it's the latter then that "next" 38% will make 100%, unless of course you're referring to losing 38% of current capacity, in which case it may not be slower at all since 38% of 38% is significantly smaller in terms of absolute volume.
It's at 38% capacity, and that's a combination of Lake Travis (37% full) and Lake Buchanan (39% full). Those are the "storage" lakes, the other lakes on the chain are kept at a fixed level (LBJ, Lake Austin, etc) and hence don't reflect overall capacity.

The LCRA web site has really comprehensive info, from real-time levels and streamflows to historical data:
LCRA River Report
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2013, 02:45 PM
 
Location: North Austin
217 posts, read 328,044 times
Reputation: 144
The lower the lake drops, the more hoarding we'll see where demand is strongest, such as expensive HOA dominated neighborhoods. I wouldn't trust the residents in the arid western portions of Travis County to behave in a civilized manner when things become tough. I think falling property values in expensive-to-maintain areas will be in our future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2013, 02:53 PM
 
593 posts, read 470,434 times
Reputation: 95
Austin is riped for a torrential downpour. it almost happend a few weeks back but the cloudburst didn't break until it got over 360
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Austin
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:14 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top