Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-31-2013, 01:25 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
2,715 posts, read 11,910,302 times
Reputation: 1434

Advertisements

I smoke like a dragon inside and outside my car. I need a place to put my ash and butt. How come automakers aren't willing to accommodate the smoking crowd anymore?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-31-2013, 01:33 PM
 
162 posts, read 381,492 times
Reputation: 142
Quote:
Originally Posted by cab591 View Post
A couple of reasons. As McKinney said, airbags got in the way. Way back in the late 80's / early 90's, the government told auto manufacturers to either install side airbags, or auto seatbelts in their cars. Going the cheap route, they rolled out auto seatbelts. When side airbags became mandatory years later, they ditched the seatbelts.

There was also an issue with selling the vehicles in other countries. Canada, for example, had higher safety regulations than the US at the time -- making cars with auto seatbelts nearly ineligible to import in Canada.

Then there were the safety issues. When the powered part of the belt was attached to the door, if the car got into an accident that forced the door open, the driver / passenger could potentially be ejected. There was also an issue with people not wearing the lap belts (which had to be put on manually). In a collision, without a lap belt, people would actually go UNDER the powered belt, causing further injuries. Lastly, some people got annoyed by the powered belts, and simply unhooked them (using only the lap belt). For obvious reasons, this caused more injuries in the event of a wreck.



With stronger cars, and more airbags, they're an obsolete technology.




EDIT:




Most cars with manual seatbelts have the ability to move the shoulder part up or down, adjusting for driver height (though it's not required, so many cheaper cars go without it). With non-adjustable shoulder height seatbelts (or powered seatbelts), short drivers find the belt going across their neck (which is obviously not safe).
THIS. Also it's worth noting some car manufactures are starting
To phase out the adjustability of the seat belts because most people
Adjust them for comfort and not optimal crash protection
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:16 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top