Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-06-2013, 06:04 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,518 posts, read 33,386,523 times
Reputation: 7636

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by FriendlyFeller View Post
Any car thats been modified to make money is a good car in my opinion.
But there is a difference...

A 1968 Charger, modified or unmodified (in good condition) is worth a lot more than a Honda Civic in the same condition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-06-2013, 06:06 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,518 posts, read 33,386,523 times
Reputation: 7636
Quote:
Originally Posted by wcu25rs View Post
not if that engine is built for those higher rpms, and Hondas are built for that.
It's still more stressful than running the same engine at less than 5,000 or 6,000 rpm.

I would rather have an engine that uses torque for acceleration rather than rely on very high rpm's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2013, 06:16 PM
 
Location: Woodbridge, va
924 posts, read 2,609,082 times
Reputation: 451
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
My point is the '68 Charger looks like a powerful, high-performance car and the Honda does not. No matter how much power (and money) the Honda is modified to make, it's still a Honda!

And taking an engine to 8200 rpms is more stressful than taking it to 5800 rpm (the typical redline of a 383-4 bbl Charger engine).

That is a matter of opinion, I think Hondas can look like performance oriented cars if modified in the right way. Also your preference of powerband is just that a preference. Favoring low end torque on the street is understandable as it is a more usable powerband but I think you underestimate the fun of taking a car past 8000 rpm.

Also Honda is king for volumetric efficiency. Many Honda engines make more than 100hp/Liter from the factory. How many Muscle cars can you say that about?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2013, 06:27 PM
 
3,183 posts, read 7,219,066 times
Reputation: 1818
Its ok to have fun with your cars. If ricin one up is fun and doesn't affect the driving safety of it who cares. One thing I find odd especially with the donk cars is the bumper height. We have/had laws that require for safety reasons that the height of the front and rear bumpers can not vary from the factory specifications by more than several inches. Why are the donk cars legal to drive?. In the past I have seen cars fail their inspection when they were jacked up too high. Are the cops just not doing their jobs. Even in South Carolina where people on bikes are arrested for having "ape hanger" handle bars these donk cars get by with no problems. Whats sup with that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2013, 06:46 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,350 posts, read 54,560,900 times
Reputation: 40820
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
It's still more stressful than running the same engine at less than 5,000 or 6,000 rpm.
RPMs aren't the only determining factors for stress, piston weight/speed and total reciprocating mass have a lot to say about what loads the engine sees.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2013, 06:58 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,518 posts, read 33,386,523 times
Reputation: 7636
Quote:
Originally Posted by tercel95 View Post
That is a matter of opinion, I think Hondas can look like performance oriented cars if modified in the right way. Also your preference of powerband is just that a preference. Favoring low end torque on the street is understandable as it is a more usable powerband but I think you underestimate the fun of taking a car past 8000 rpm.
Yes, it is a matter of opinion. The cars I like don't need to rev to 8000 rpm to make their power. But let's not try to fool ourselves... a Honda will always look like a Honda. And will never look like a '60s/early-'70s American muscle like these:





Quote:
Also Honda is king for volumetric efficiency. Many Honda engines make more than 100hp/Liter from the factory. How many Muscle cars can you say that about?
Oh, yeah, the old "hp/liter." Well, I don't use the term "liter." Cubic inches all the way for me, baby!
How many Hondas can lay rubber for 100+ feet (without powerbraking)?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2013, 06:59 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,518 posts, read 33,386,523 times
Reputation: 7636
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
RPMs aren't the only determining factors for stress, piston weight/speed and total reciprocating mass have a lot to say about what loads the engine sees.
That's true, but rpm's still are a main factor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2013, 07:42 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,350 posts, read 54,560,900 times
Reputation: 40820
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
That's true, but rpm's still are a main factor.
Not really. Light piston, light pin, light rod, short stroke may well result in less load at 8-9,000 RPM than heavy piston, heavy pin, heavy rod, long stroke at 5,000 RPM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2013, 07:49 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,350 posts, read 54,560,900 times
Reputation: 40820
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
My point is the '68 Charger looks like a powerful, high-performance car and the Honda does not. No matter how much power (and money) the Honda is modified to make, it's still a Honda!
And if that Honda's an NSX?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-06-2013, 07:50 PM
 
Location: San Antonio, TX USA
5,251 posts, read 14,296,668 times
Reputation: 8232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
How many Hondas can lay rubber for 100+ feet (without powerbraking)?
How many muscle cars can get 30+ mpg will still running mid to low 14 seconds 1/4 mile?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top