Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-14-2017, 05:25 PM
 
6,589 posts, read 4,980,255 times
Reputation: 8046

Advertisements

Do you really need room for that many people? When you get married and have kids, whenever that is, you may find your needs have completely changed.

For me a minivan would not be practical. I adore my little 2 door hatch (bikes go on top everything else in the trunk). I have a small pickup for hauling brush and messy stuff I don't want in the car (bikes go in the bed).

The little Transits are great in theory, I like them a lot. But I find most vans these days to have poor visibility. I never had issues with large old box vans but now that everything is so aero I can never get happy with mirror placements.

I always liked the older Outback wagons. But only up to 2010 or so. Hate the new Forrester sized ones.

Oh - and like others said - middle aged? Please. Late 50s at the earliest
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-14-2017, 05:27 PM
 
Location: new yawk zoo
8,695 posts, read 11,086,262 times
Reputation: 6386
Quote:
Originally Posted by 87112 View Post
I agree with this, if it was not for the not so great MPG I would only buy minivans from now on.
Mazda MPV, Kia Rondo those types of cars are really practical.
minivans actually get great MPG. In all highway, I was able to pull 500 miles in one tank of Odyssey. It gets solid MPG for its size.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2017, 05:32 PM
 
Location: Paranoid State
13,044 posts, read 13,872,320 times
Reputation: 15839
I prefer my 05 Dodge Durango AWD. It is plenty big so I can toss skis in the back (I ski about 5 to 6 days/week during ski season), and I've never been stuck in the snow. And it is great for runs to Home Depot or Costco.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2017, 06:54 PM
 
7,992 posts, read 5,390,759 times
Reputation: 35568
I had a mini van for a long time. Gosh, it held everything. I was always impressed with what I could fit in there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2017, 07:03 PM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
34,726 posts, read 58,079,686 times
Reputation: 46195
Quote:
Originally Posted by GiGi603 View Post
I had a mini van for a long time. Gosh, it held everything. I was always impressed with what I could fit in there.
Same with my VW Rabbit!

Foldaway seats, open hatch... I have built several houses using my Rabbit as a toter... (have bumper / roof racks for 20' long wood and steel)

+ 50 mpg since 1976, no dinosaurs required!

BTW: I still keep a minivan around for 'Bigger' cargo needs (and I step up through 3 truck sizes from there (when needed... seldom)

Snowbear utility trailer (2200GVW) is another great Workhorse. My Rabbit, and Minivan tow it almost daily!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-14-2017, 07:49 PM
 
Location: Long Island
9,531 posts, read 15,889,107 times
Reputation: 5949
Granted I haven't driven all the minivans out there, but - if you don't mind driving a boat that wavers and rolls, then the minivan is for you. I just can't get over driving those monsters around (and I have to for extended-family outings). I daily drive an SUV with tight sport suspension. It's only about 25% less practical than a minivan but I'll take the trade-off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2017, 04:32 AM
 
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
11,157 posts, read 14,008,095 times
Reputation: 14940
Minivans are awful. Granted if that's what OP or anyone else wants then by all means pursue what you want! I think they're best suited for taxis and uber drivers. My wife and I had one a few years ago and it was a terrible vehicle. Design quality was atrocious. To be fair, this was a Chevy Uplander and as far as minivans go it was probably worse than others, as evidenced by it's short existence as a model.

We now have 2 full size SUVs. The one we bought to replace tomatoes mentioned minivan and the second we picked up about a month ago as my daily driver. I was looking for a ~2000-2002 4Runner but found an 02 Sequioa with low miles at a pretty good price. We do just enough off road/beach driving/towing that a minivan would not be a practical vehicle for us.

With that said, OP if you want a minivan and can afford to do it, go for it! You like what you like for your reasons and you owe nobody and explanation for any of it!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2017, 05:06 AM
 
Location: Mount Airy, Maryland
16,279 posts, read 10,421,470 times
Reputation: 27599
You sound like the oldest 30 years old I have ever come across.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2017, 05:09 AM
 
9,511 posts, read 4,346,563 times
Reputation: 10585
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovi8 View Post
Granted I haven't driven all the minivans out there, but - if you don't mind driving a boat that wavers and rolls, then the minivan is for you. I just can't get over driving those monsters around (and I have to for extended-family outings). I daily drive an SUV with tight sport suspension. It's only about 25% less practical than a minivan but I'll take the trade-off.
A few select SUVs handle well: BMW X5M, Grand Cherokee SRT-8, etc., but the average run-of-the-mill SUV has inferior chassis dynamics relative to a minivan. Handling is very important to me, which is one of the main reasons I stay away from SUVs. I'm not saying minivans are sports cars, but to claim SUVs are superior to minivans because of handling is stupefying. Quite the opposite, in fact.

With few exceptions, there is no "Sport" in SUV. The "Utility" part is conspicuously absent in many as well. But, at least the "vehicle" part is accurate.

I'd bet that if the majority of SUV owners were capable of doing an non-emotion based assessment of their vehicle needs, they'd get a minivan. "I don't like the image" is an emotion-based statement. Claims of inferior interior space and chassis dynamics are simply excuse making.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-15-2017, 05:48 AM
 
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
11,157 posts, read 14,008,095 times
Reputation: 14940
Quote:
Originally Posted by YourWakeUpCall View Post
A few select SUVs handle well: BMW X5M, Grand Cherokee SRT-8, etc., but the average run-of-the-mill SUV has inferior chassis dynamics relative to a minivan. Handling is very important to me, which is one of the main reasons I stay away from SUVs. I'm not saying minivans are sports cars, but to claim SUVs are superior to minivans because of handling is stupefying. Quite the opposite, in fact.
I disagree. While minivans ride more similarly to a car, that alone doesn't make them superior with respect to handling. When we bought our first Sequioa one thing that impressed me about it was the quality of the ride, handling, and maneuverability especially for such a large vehicle.

Quote:
With few exceptions, there is no "Sport" in SUV. The "Utility" part is conspicuously absent in many as well. But, at least the "vehicle" part is accurate.
This is purely opinion. While "sport" is relative with all of these vehicles, the untility (at least with the ones I own) cannot be questioned. It's a matter of lifestyle preference, though. If you're most ambitious goal for your vehicle is to drive for uber then a minivan may be your best bet. A minvan's utility would be insufficient for my family's use.


Quote:
I'd bet that if the majority of SUV owners were capable of doing an non-emotion based assessment of their vehicle needs, they'd get a minivan. "I don't like the image" is an emotion-based statement. Claims of inferior interior space and chassis dynamics are simply excuse making.
Doubtful. If I had a dollar for every time my wife or I said "we wouldn't have been able to do this in our minivan" we'd have paid off our first Sequioa within a year! As for not liking the image, the one minivan I owned was such a prolifically bad vehicle that "image" became the least of my concerns. When it became a safety risk to my children I quickly traded it away for what I could get for it and upgraded to an ininitelt better vehicle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:35 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top