Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-22-2010, 10:13 PM
 
Location: Wheaton, Illinois
10,261 posts, read 21,758,251 times
Reputation: 10454

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hoffdano View Post
Job banks, over emphasis on seniority are two that come to mind immediately. Resistance to automation is another.

Job banks are going down the tubes. Seniority protects workers from arbitrary and unjust assignments and from nepotism. Many unions don't have seniority rules.

I've never seen resistance to automation. Can you name a specific instance?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-22-2010, 10:20 PM
 
Location: Central Texas
13,714 posts, read 31,180,231 times
Reputation: 9270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irishtom29 View Post
Job banks are going down the tubes. Seniority protects workers from arbitrary and unjust assignments and from nepotism. Many unions don't have seniority rules.

I've never seen resistance to automation. Can you name a specific instance?
Seniority protects older, less capable, and mediocre workers. It reduces the ability of a worker to earn more pay based on their own quality and work ethic.

Nepotism is easy to prevent. It should have nothing to do with seniority.

I know that union workers at the General Dynamics plant in Fort Worth repeatedly sabotaged automation equipment designed to speed the assembly of F16s. The equipment of course would have improved productivity and eliminated some jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2010, 10:39 PM
 
Location: Wheaton, Illinois
10,261 posts, read 21,758,251 times
Reputation: 10454
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoffdano View Post
Seniority protects older, less capable, and mediocre workers. It reduces the ability of a worker to earn more pay based on their own quality and work ethic.
.
Since the union workplaces that have seniority rules are usually also the highest paying your assertion doesn't wash. Of course a fella go work non union and be paid less for his own quality and work ethic. That's the rub; the non union places that claim to reward merit pay less. One might reasonably draw the conclusion that merit has no merit.


Quote:
Originally Posted by hoffdano View Post
Nepotism is easy to prevent. It should have nothing to do with seniority.
.
Actually nepotism is very hard to prevent, even in unionized places. Seniority guards against nepotism and favoritism. It's called wanting to be treated justly. Justice is good, no?


Quote:
Originally Posted by hoffdano View Post
I know that union workers at the General Dynamics plant in Fort Worth repeatedly sabotaged automation equipment designed to speed the assembly of F16s. The equipment of course would have improved productivity and eliminated some jobs.
OK. I wonder if non-union guys do the same thing. They must want to protect their jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2010, 10:55 PM
 
Location: Wheaton, Illinois
10,261 posts, read 21,758,251 times
Reputation: 10454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover View Post
An organization that most likely couldn't operate without special government protection is parasitic. The rubble that used to be any major industrial city in the U.S. is testament to that fact.
.
Ah, you mean parasites like corporations since they can't exist without government protection and their decisions to build poor products and ship jobs overseas (from non union areas as well as union ones) have ruined many industrial cities and our industrial economy?



Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover View Post
Collective bargaining hampers individual initiative because it's not rewarded, and it's more difficult for companies to cull the deadweight from its labor pool. Seniority is rewarded, but seniority is not synonymous with productivity. When you get paid the same whether you're a workhorse or a loafer, you provide an incentive for the workhorses to go somewhere where their pay is commensurate with their output and not directly tied to everyone else's output, and you provide an incentive for the loafer to stick around.

Since the highest paying places are usually union there's no incentive for the worker with initiative to leave such a place. Note that many businesses pull their management from the ranks of the unionized workers so there are incentives to excell. And did you know that many people excell just because it pleases them to do so? Yes, it's true.

Christ knows that union wages in Chicago provide plenty of incentive for guys from Texas and the South to boom up here and work turnarounds; you never see northerners booming south.

As for loafers; well it's management's job to get rid of them. Many outsiders are surprised to find out out how easy it is to fire a deadbeat in a union shop, I know, I was often a steward. Once management gets up the gumption that is; it's surprising how pussified modern management often is, even in construction.

In any event it's the purpose of any economic entity, including unions, to get as much as it can while giving as little as it can. That's called business. That some unions make poor decisions is no more a reason to be against unions in general than it is be to be against business in general because some businesses make poor decisions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2010, 11:06 PM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,201,963 times
Reputation: 29983
Of course, one of those poor business decisions was setting up shop in places where unions have such heavy sway over the workforce and government policy. Which is why they stopped doing that. But of course, the unions are blameless in the whole situation. Typical union mentality -- everyone's fault but theirs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2010, 11:19 PM
 
Location: Wheaton, Illinois
10,261 posts, read 21,758,251 times
Reputation: 10454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover View Post
Of course, one of those poor business decisions was setting up shop in places where unions have such heavy sway over the workforce and government policy. Which is why they stopped doing that. But of course, the unions are blameless in the whole situation. Typical union mentality -- everyone's fault but theirs.

The businesses were there before the unions existed. Get your history right before you worry about your theory. Note that many businesses that are unionized are doing well as are many nations that are heavily unionized. Where does that fit into your theory?

I don't think I said unions were blameless, I said they like business can make bad decisions. You're being petulant.

Jump in your car and come down to the Weathermark and we'll hash this out; nothing else going on tonight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2010, 12:25 AM
 
Location: Chicago
38,707 posts, read 103,201,963 times
Reputation: 29983
^^ Sorry, I misread "unions" as "businesses." But the problem isn't just a couple poor business decisions but a fundamentally flawed system. Otherwise the disinvestment in Northern cities and capital flight to the South and to other nations wouldn't have been so systemic. Foreign companies in heavily unionized nations do well by doing the exact same thing as companies every other nation: move operations whenever possible to wherever productivity is highest relative to cost, including costs of reimportation (if it wasn't originally for export), extra overhead in managing over a distance often in a different language, etc. You think Renault builds all its cars in France?

And no, I won't be stopping by the Weathermark, I've got stuff to do tomorrow. Like graduate. Family coming into to town too. I should be in bed right now but just like practically every night insomnia is winning the battle.

I'm not looking forward to returning to the 9-5 grind.

Last edited by Drover; 05-23-2010 at 12:33 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2010, 07:59 AM
 
Location: Wheaton, Illinois
10,261 posts, read 21,758,251 times
Reputation: 10454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drover View Post
I've got stuff to do tomorrow. Like graduate. Family coming into to town too.

Congratulations and good luck.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-23-2010, 09:23 AM
 
Location: Central Texas
13,714 posts, read 31,180,231 times
Reputation: 9270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irishtom29 View Post
Since the union workplaces that have seniority rules are usually also the highest paying your assertion doesn't wash. Of course a fella go work non union and be paid less for his own quality and work ethic. That's the rub; the non union places that claim to reward merit pay less. One might reasonably draw the conclusion that merit has no merit.




Actually nepotism is very hard to prevent, even in unionized places. Seniority guards against nepotism and favoritism. It's called wanting to be treated justly. Justice is good, no?




OK. I wonder if non-union guys do the same thing. They must want to protect their jobs.
Nepotism doesn't exist in any major degree in professional (e.g. college degree) work. Simple rules to prohibit any person from supervision, appraisal, roles of any relative (by blood or marriage) takes care of it.

Union shops may pay more - but they may also pay too much. Their negotiated contracts (for wages and benefits) prevent the movement of wages according to economic conditions. The UAW of course is the poster child for this.

Every worker would rather be paid more. But that doesn't mean they are willing to take the negatives of the union economy. I don't think those autoworkers in Tennessee, Alabama, and Ohio (not far away) are rushing to move to Michigan for a coveted UAW job.

Oh - those job banks are going away - but not because the unions thought it was a good idea. They are going away because the system was crashing all around them. They had to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-27-2010, 07:41 PM
 
Location: in area code 919 & from 716
927 posts, read 1,459,329 times
Reputation: 458
all I can say is the 2007 Hyundai Tiburon sux!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Automotive

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:11 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top