Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-14-2018, 07:18 AM
 
Location: So Ca
26,763 posts, read 26,869,136 times
Reputation: 24820

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by PrudentialBroker View Post
Man I remember when Prop 13 came out, so many ppl were against it.
I was too young to own anything then, but I remember that every homeowner I knew was for it.

How could anyone have been against a proposition that eliminated guesswork and anxiety, every time the homeowner opened his or her property tax bill? Before Prop 13 passed, there were homeowners who had already decided to sell and move out of state since they couldn't afford their unpredictable and escalating property taxes.

https://www.retroreport.org/video/mad-as-hell/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-14-2018, 10:11 AM
 
28,115 posts, read 63,720,668 times
Reputation: 23268
Quote:
Originally Posted by PrudentialBroker View Post
Man I remember when Prop 13 came out, so many ppl were against it.
Yep... just about every public employee, union, elected officials etc... the effort was tremendous.

To really understand Prop 13 you need to understand two things.

The Home Owner Exemption which only applied to homes was woefully behind the times... the $7500 exemption really meant something when a modest home cost 12 to 15k...

Had the legislature simply indexed the exemption for inflation it is doubtful Prop 13 would have enjoyed the 2/3 voter support it received... there are quotes from politician saying they wanted the voters to decide never imagining it would get anywhere and at the eleventh hour the State even floated a competing measure...

Second... and very important where schools are concerned is the Serrano Decision where the State took over school funding and the local tax dollars that went to local schools... it was one thing to pay higher taxes with the money going to local schools but many voters were outraged the State was taking local money and let it be known at the ballot box.

I still remember my Dad sitting at the kitchen table saying we were up against the wall when he opened his tax bill with double digit tax increase... this is when we had gas lines, inflation, stagflation, energy crisis... etc.

Even the most generous voters had enough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2018, 10:13 AM
 
28,115 posts, read 63,720,668 times
Reputation: 23268
Quote:
Originally Posted by CA4Now View Post
I was too young to own anything then, but I remember that every homeowner I knew was for it.

How could anyone have been against a proposition that eliminated guesswork and anxiety, every time the homeowner opened his or her property tax bill? Before Prop 13 passed, there were homeowners who had already decided to sell and move out of state since they couldn't afford their unpredictable and escalating property taxes.

https://www.retroreport.org/video/mad-as-hell/
... and there were not enough home owners to comprise the 2/3 that voted for Prop 13... many hoped to be voters also voted for it.

Both my grade school teacher and my uncle were renters at the time Prop 13 became law... both had their rents reduced as a result of Prop 13...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2018, 10:14 AM
 
18,172 posts, read 16,421,833 times
Reputation: 9328
Quote:
Originally Posted by CA4Now View Post
I was too young to own anything then, but I remember that every homeowner I knew was for it.

How could anyone have been against a proposition that eliminated guesswork and anxiety, every time the homeowner opened his or her property tax bill? Before Prop 13 passed, there were homeowners who had already decided to sell and move out of state since they couldn't afford their unpredictable and escalating property taxes.

https://www.retroreport.org/video/mad-as-hell/
It appears that those against it do not care about homeowners, just about their being able to buy from a homeowner who will lose his house over excessive taxation. Very self centered.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2018, 10:19 AM
 
28,115 posts, read 63,720,668 times
Reputation: 23268
Too much short term thinking...

I am the youngest in my neighborhood with the oldest and smallest home...

I pay the largest Property Tax Bill... and I do not begrudge my mostly retired neighbors one bit... they make the street the wonderful neighborhood it is.

On the flip side... I fully intend in 30 to 40 years to join them in the ranks of lower taxes...

They long ago retired the bonds for the sewer and drainage and infrastructure that I enjoy simply by choosing to buy here.

I believe the greatest fallacy is the thinking a recent buyer will pay less in taxes if those that have owned for a long time pay more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2018, 12:20 PM
 
Location: So Ca
26,763 posts, read 26,869,136 times
Reputation: 24820
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultrarunner View Post
I believe the greatest fallacy is the thinking a recent buyer will pay less in taxes if those that have owned for a long time pay more.
Absolutely.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2018, 01:06 PM
 
18,069 posts, read 18,843,573 times
Reputation: 25191
They should just fix the problem; quit connecting property taxes to the value of the home.

It is the only tax that is not dependent on the means of the person to pay it, unless being homeless is considered a legitimate alternative. It is also a tax that is not connected to a person's use of services the tax pays for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2018, 03:13 PM
 
28,115 posts, read 63,720,668 times
Reputation: 23268
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxus View Post
They should just fix the problem; quit connecting property taxes to the value of the home.

It is the only tax that is not dependent on the means of the person to pay it, unless being homeless is considered a legitimate alternative. It is also a tax that is not connected to a person's use of services the tax pays for.
Very true... every other tax I can think of has a trigger... income, spending, importing etc.

Property Tax just happens...

Prior to Prop 13 getting priced out was a very real problem... government must now at least received at least 55% voter support to build or rebuild a school and 2/3 for everything else.

Tax an individual out from under the roof over their head is about as un-American as it gets.

As mentioned... I have been on the receiving end of a 80% tax increase over what I had paid 18 months prior on an Arms Length transaction... Washington State.

How can California be running out of money when it is at the top when it comes to taxation and has abundant resources?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2018, 03:37 PM
 
18,172 posts, read 16,421,833 times
Reputation: 9328
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultrarunner View Post
Very true... every other tax I can think of has a trigger... income, spending, importing etc.

Property Tax just happens...

Prior to Prop 13 getting priced out was a very real problem... government must now at least received at least 55% voter support to build or rebuild a school and 2/3 for everything else.

Tax an individual out from under the roof over their head is about as un-American as it gets.

As mentioned... I have been on the receiving end of a 80% tax increase over what I had paid 18 months prior on an Arms Length transaction... Washington State.

How can California be running out of money when it is at the top when it comes to taxation and has abundant resources?
Why does a business with a valuable product, many buyers, huge level of income, still find itself running out of money and raising prices?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2018, 03:42 PM
 
Location: Sylmar, a part of Los Angeles
8,360 posts, read 6,449,014 times
Reputation: 17479
When 13 passed it took 2/3rds to get schools built or rebuilt too. The Communists got it reduced to 55%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top