Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-30-2017, 07:02 AM
 
Location: La Costa, California
919 posts, read 790,677 times
Reputation: 2023

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
In Jan. 2013, California's unemployment rate was 12.1% while the minimum wage was $8.00/hr.

In May 2017, California's unemployment rate was 4.7% while the minimum wage was $10.50/hr.

Raising the minimum wage didn't kill jobs; the opposite occurred, it seemed to have created them. There's no data to support that, so it's fair to say that raising the minimum wage did not hurt employment. That backs up a lot of national studies that came to the same conclusion.
Thanks for the facts Robert Reich has some very good videos debunking some of the talking points rebublicans keep repeating.

The one I love and one we heard just above is that "these jobs were not meant to do that" (provide a living wage) lol Meant? Who meant that they not do that?
Dave
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-30-2017, 07:34 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles (Native)
25,303 posts, read 21,482,730 times
Reputation: 12319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
In Jan. 2013, California's unemployment rate was 12.1% while the minimum wage was $8.00/hr.

In May 2017, California's unemployment rate was 4.7% while the minimum wage was $10.50/hr.

Raising the minimum wage didn't kill jobs; the opposite occurred, it seemed to have created them. There's no data to support that, so it's fair to say that raising the minimum wage did not hurt employment. That backs up a lot of national studies that came to the same conclusion.
In 2013 the economy across the country was a lot worse than 2017 and unemployment was very high across the country not just in California .

Higher minimum wage did not create jobs . It was just that business owners and consumers were hurting during that time . It was much harder to borrow money and get loans etc .

One thing is a fact . Higher minimum wages are unattractive to employers .
I think it'll be not too bad for big business because lots of their independent immigrant owned small business competition will get killed thanks to politicians .

Big business can automate and run efficiently , buy in bulk etc .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2017, 08:51 AM
 
Location: So Ca
26,757 posts, read 26,856,992 times
Reputation: 24820
Quote:
Originally Posted by mauialoha View Post
the one I love and one we heard just above is that "these jobs were not meant to do that" (provide a living wage) lol Meant? Who meant that they not do that?
Many people agree with that concept, though, since they see people who hold minimum wage jobs as unskilled workers.
https://medium.com/@amuse/minimum-wa...e-18c8f0fd65bc
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2017, 09:10 AM
 
18,172 posts, read 16,418,048 times
Reputation: 9328
Quote:
Originally Posted by mauialoha View Post
Thanks for the facts Robert Reich has some very good videos debunking some of the talking points rebublicans keep repeating.

The one I love and one we heard just above is that "these jobs were not meant to do that" (provide a living wage) lol Meant? Who meant that they not do that?
Dave
Not Republican talking points. From the BLS release:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/timwors.../#3e4d8a7b2b5c

Minimum wage jobs are .... entry level jobs and never meant supply a family, rather for kids to start working. The economy is so bad people of all ages needing any job are taking them. But they were never designed to support families.

The Libs are trying to change the facts:https://www.forbes.com/sites/michael.../#261029e156ae
The Berkeley Labor Center has done at least six other studies on the minimum wage in California municipalities, all showing that a wage increase would be beneficial. In fact, Jacobs could not name a study conducted by Berkeley that said raising wages would have an overall negative impact. ...
Given this history of identical results, it's not surprising that the Murray administration in Seattle was anxious to have a copy of the predictably-positive Berkeley report to tout on the third anniversary of its minimum wage law.


Yet the anecdotal evidence in Seattle backs up the empirical data provided by the UW team. Local restaurant owners of establishments such as Louisa's Cafe and z Pizza have shut down, citing the cost of the minimum wage law as a factor. Karam Mann, a franchisee who owns a Subway location with his wife Heidi, has cut his staffing levels from seven employees down to three.

The wage floor is still rising in Seattle, and there are more chapters to write on the city's minimum wage experiment. But if accuracy if the goal, the Berkeley team is not the right choice to author them.

Also: https://shiftwa.org/more-seattle-res...ge-approaches/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2017, 09:33 AM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,861 posts, read 26,322,713 times
Reputation: 34063
Quote:
Originally Posted by jm1982 View Post
In 2013 the economy across the country was a lot worse than 2017 and unemployment was very high across the country not just in California .
Higher minimum wage did not create jobs . It was just that business owners and consumers were hurting during that time . It was much harder to borrow money and get loans etc .
One thing is a fact . Higher minimum wages are unattractive to employers .
I think it'll be not too bad for big business because lots of their independent immigrant owned small business competition will get killed thanks to politicians .
Big business can automate and run efficiently , buy in bulk etc .
All wages are unattractive to employers. Are we now going to determine worker pay on what is 'attractive' to an employer? Business is booming in spite of minimum wage increases and unemployment is down, if you want to provide another theory for that then do so, but please show some data backing it up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2017, 09:51 AM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,861 posts, read 26,322,713 times
Reputation: 34063
Quote:
Originally Posted by expatCA View Post
Not Republican talking points. From the BLS release:
If that's not a BLS release it's an opinion piece from AEI a right wing think tank. And please note it goes through Dec 2015 so the information is now 18 months old
Quote:
Originally Posted by expatCA View Post
https://www.forbes.com/sites/timwors.../#3e4d8a7b2b5c
Minimum wage jobs are .... entry level jobs and never meant supply a family, rather for kids to start working. The economy is so bad people of all ages needing any job are taking them. But they were never designed to support families.
That's just another conservative regurgitating the same data that you presented in your AEI link.
Quote:
Originally Posted by expatCA View Post
The Libs are trying to change the facts:https://www.forbes.com/sites/michael.../#261029e156ae
The Berkeley Labor Center has done at least six other studies on the minimum wage in California municipalities, all showing that a wage increase would be beneficial. In fact, Jacobs could not name a study conducted by Berkeley that said raising wages would have an overall negative impact. ...
Given this history of identical results, it's not surprising that the Murray administration in Seattle was nxious to have a copy of the predictably-positive Berkeley report to tout on the third anniversary of its minimum wage law.
Strangest opinion piece I've read in a while the author didn't attack the data in the Berkeley report but went after the source..umm yeah that was really compelling. You might want to look at this article to get a different point of view https://www.americanprogress.org/iss...-minimum-wage/
Quote:
Originally Posted by expatCA View Post
Yet the anecdotal evidence in Seattle backs up the empirical data provided by the UW team. Local restaurant owners of establishments such as Louisa's Cafe
You didn't even read it did you? The business had far more problems than a minimum wage increase and I hate to break it to you, but no one is going to prep cook in Seattle for $11 an hour no matter how badly Louisa wishes they would.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2017, 10:34 AM
 
18,172 posts, read 16,418,048 times
Reputation: 9328
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
If that's not a BLS release it's an opinion piece from AEI a right wing think tank. And please note it goes through Dec 2015 so the information is now 18 months old
That's just another conservative regurgitating the same data that you presented in your AEI link.
Strangest opinion piece I've read in a while the author didn't attack the data in the Berkeley report but went after the source..umm yeah that was really compelling. You might want to look at this article to get a different point of view https://www.americanprogress.org/iss...-minimum-wage/
You didn't even read it did you? The business had far more problems than a minimum wage increase and I hate to break it to you, but no one is going to prep cook in Seattle for $11 an hour no matter how badly Louisa wishes they would.
The data is the data regardless of which group posts it. Yes it is in 2015 and even then problems. No update yet to check.

No one is going to hire a kid fresh out of school or an adult at $15.00 and hour either, when they can hire illegals at way less.

Louisa is "one" account and there were others as well, so one does not change the problem. Not my problem as I have never paid minimum wage to anyone, always above it.

Oh, Unions support it because many of their contracts require a raise to union members anytime the minimum wage goes up. That costs the economy as well, but they do not care.

The companies that need unskilled workers, who get raises as they learn, are hurt by the law and must either reduce staff, go to robotics, raise prices so YOU pay the raise or close.

From an LA Times article.

The early takeaway: Many restaurants, which are highly dependent on low-wage labor, are reacting by raising prices.

"The message that we've heard is that businesses are making adjustments," Vigdor said. "But so far, those adjustments have not involved anything on the order of mass layoffs or mass shutdowns. The most common response is that they're going to increase prices."

City-Data.com - Stats about all US cities - real estate, relocation info, crime, house prices, cost of living, races, home value estimator, recent sales, income, photos, schools, maps, weather, neighborhoods, and more.latimes.com/business/la-fi-wage-cities-20160331-story.html

Minimum wage raises have always cost someone and rarely the company owner. How this will work out is yet to be seen, but prices are going up in many places and more robotics are being used as well.

I am not against the minimum wage, I just recognize it has a down side as well as an upside. It is a win/lose situation, never a win/win one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2017, 11:44 AM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,861 posts, read 26,322,713 times
Reputation: 34063
Quote:
Originally Posted by expatCA View Post
The data is the data regardless of which group posts it. Yes it is in 2015 and even then problems. No update yet to check.

No one is going to hire a kid fresh out of school or an adult at $15.00 and hour either, when they can hire illegals at way less.

Louisa is "one" account and there were others as well, so one does not change the problem. Not my problem as I have never paid minimum wage to anyone, always above it.

Oh, Unions support it because many of their contracts require a raise to union members anytime the minimum wage goes up. That costs the economy as well, but they do not care.

The companies that need unskilled workers, who get raises as they learn, are hurt by the law and must either reduce staff, go to robotics, raise prices so YOU pay the raise or close.

From an LA Times article.

The early takeaway: Many restaurants, which are highly dependent on low-wage labor, are reacting by raising prices.

"The message that we've heard is that businesses are making adjustments," Vigdor said. "But so far, those adjustments have not involved anything on the order of mass layoffs or mass shutdowns. The most common response is that they're going to increase prices."

City-Data.com - Stats about all US cities - real estate, relocation info, crime, house prices, cost of living, races, home value estimator, recent sales, income, photos, schools, maps, weather, neighborhoods, and more.latimes.com/business/la-fi-wage-cities-20160331-story.html

Minimum wage raises have always cost someone and rarely the company owner. How this will work out is yet to be seen, but prices are going up in many places and more robotics are being used as well.

I am not against the minimum wage, I just recognize it has a down side as well as an upside. It is a win/lose situation, never a win/win one.
Automation will replace workers no matter what the minimum wage is, as the costs of automation decrease it will be implemented no matter what the minimum wage is.

When is the last time restaurants lowered prices? Geez, they had the benefit of $7.25 an hour for 9 years and how many times during that period did they reduce prices? It's just not that big of a deal and prices don't go up that much with minimum wage increases since wages are only 17-25% of the cost of goods sold and not every worker in the industry earns minimum wage.

Food prices go up but no one on CD seems to want to start hair on fire threads about how the price of ground beef which has doubled since 2010 means the death of restaurants and fast food stores even though food consumes something like 30% of the cost of goods sold for restaurants and fast food stores, but around here any cost increase other than wages is met with crickets

I don't think you can pull off large minimum wage increases in SW Missouri, or in most parts of Louisiana or Alabama but for most of the west coast it's moot because employers are not finding employees who will work for anything close to $9 or $10 an hour, those employees find that they can do better working in the gig economy. By the time the $15 minimum goes into effect I am guessing that most employees in impacted areas will already be making that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2017, 12:20 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles (Native)
25,303 posts, read 21,482,730 times
Reputation: 12319
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
All wages are unattractive to employers. Are we now going to determine worker pay on what is 'attractive' to an employer? Business is booming in spite of minimum wage increases and unemployment is down, if you want to provide another theory for that then do so, but please show some data backing it up.
Yes we should want to make sure labor costs are attractive if we want to be competitive with other states and countries.
So employers are the ones actually paying and writing checks to pay employees yet the employer shouldn't determine the wage ?
This is another step towards socialism but of course that's what some in this country want .

Min wages aren't at $15 yet in CA but they will be soon

Of course the pro $15 crowd will just say the businesses weren't "innovative " enough to succeed .

Last edited by jm1982; 06-30-2017 at 12:32 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2017, 12:35 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles (Native)
25,303 posts, read 21,482,730 times
Reputation: 12319
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
Automation will replace workers no matter what the minimum wage is, as the costs of automation decrease it will be implemented no matter what the minimum wage is.

When is the last time restaurants lowered prices? Geez, they had the benefit of $7.25 an hour for 9 years and how many times during that period did they reduce prices? It's just not that big of a deal and prices don't go up that much with minimum wage increases since wages are only 17-25% of the cost of goods sold and not every worker in the industry earns minimum wage.

Food prices go up but no one on CD seems to want to start hair on fire threads about how the price of ground beef which has doubled since 2010 means the death of restaurants and fast food stores even though food consumes something like 30% of the cost of goods sold for restaurants and fast food stores, but around here any cost increase other than wages is met with crickets

I don't think you can pull off large minimum wage increases in SW Missouri, or in most parts of Louisiana or Alabama but for most of the west coast it's moot because employers are not finding employees who will work for anything close to $9 or $10 an hour, those employees find that they can do better working in the gig economy. By the time the $15 minimum goes into effect I am guessing that most employees in impacted areas will already be making that.
I don't know the prices in Sacramento but in L.A food at fast food type places or fast casual has gone up a lot .
Much much higher than the cost of living increase many people get from their jobs which is likd 3 percent

I've seen places jump way more than 10 percent in less than a year.

I've seen the pro $15 crowd say ridiculous stuff like the price of a burger will go up 10 cents if min wage is $15hr that's just absurd .

Keep in mind . It's not just the restaurant will not just be affected by higher labor costs for their employees but the delivery guy is going to cost the vendors more money now so they are going to get hit there .
The list goes on .

Look at when gas was over $4 and all the companies were charging fuel surcharges .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:35 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top