Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-19-2009, 05:25 PM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
14,129 posts, read 31,257,288 times
Reputation: 6920

Advertisements

You will be required to show ID before boarding the train.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-19-2009, 05:28 PM
 
11,715 posts, read 40,455,391 times
Reputation: 7586
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAVA1990 View Post
You will be required to show ID before boarding the train.
I would hope so. If they were to build HSR without airport style security and it became a popular mode of transportation, it would be a very soft and very high profile target for terrorists. Why bother getting around TSA and metal detectors when you could just walk onto a train with a bomb?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2009, 05:32 PM
 
Location: yeah
5,717 posts, read 16,352,002 times
Reputation: 2975
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAVA1990 View Post
You will be required to show ID before boarding the train.
You mean like when I buy alcohol? ****, what a pain!
Quote:
Originally Posted by EscapeCalifornia View Post
I would hope so. If they were to build HSR without airport style security and it became a popular mode of transportation, it would be a very soft and very high profile target for terrorists. Why bother getting around TSA and metal detectors when you could just walk onto a train with a bomb?
You could kill more people at a sporting event, which has magic wands and maybe a pat-down. Airports are heavily secured because you can actually take over a plane and go wherever you want, possibly turning the plane itself into a weapon. Nobody drove a train into the World Trade Center. Just because HSR plans to compete with planes, suddenly they share all characteristics? No, trains are still trains.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2009, 06:26 PM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
14,129 posts, read 31,257,288 times
Reputation: 6920
I believe we had to go through metal detectors and show ID before people flew planes into buildings. Believe me, the train will operate much more like a plane than a subway. Look for these features:

1. Reservations required, probably via internet only. No jumping on and off trains by whim.
2. Airline style revenue management (different fares like an airline based on time of purchase, time of travel, and other factors).
3. Checked baggage
4. Metal detectors and baggage X-ray machines (you have to do this now just to go to the Smithsonian.).
5. Assigned seating.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2009, 06:29 PM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
14,129 posts, read 31,257,288 times
Reputation: 6920
Quote:
Originally Posted by krudmonk View Post
You mean like when I buy alcohol? ****, what a pain!

You could kill more people at a sporting event, which has magic wands and maybe a pat-down. Airports are heavily secured because you can actually take over a plane and go wherever you want, possibly turning the plane itself into a weapon. Nobody drove a train into the World Trade Center. Just because HSR plans to compete with planes, suddenly they share all characteristics? No, trains are still trains.
Remember, we're talking "perceieved" rather than actual risk. Why do I have to go through a metal detector at a government building and not a shopping mall? Any government run facility (including the high speed train) will be secured to the greatest extent possible. No bureaucrat wants to take the risk of being undersecured.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2009, 10:50 AM
 
Location: yeah
5,717 posts, read 16,352,002 times
Reputation: 2975
Fair enough, but the collective paranoia with regard to terrorism may have subsided by then. Let's hope so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2009, 10:51 AM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
14,129 posts, read 31,257,288 times
Reputation: 6920
Quote:
Originally Posted by krudmonk View Post
Fair enough, but the collective paranoia with regard to terrorism may have subsided by then. Let's hope so.
Amen to that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2009, 02:48 PM
 
12,823 posts, read 24,406,112 times
Reputation: 11042
Quote:
Originally Posted by SEAandATL View Post
Really? A lot of people compare California to Japan.
And that is a bogus comparison. Go try and find a place like the Carizzo Plain, or even, for that matter, Eastern Santa Clara County, in Japan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2009, 08:34 PM
 
Location: In Transition
1,637 posts, read 1,910,217 times
Reputation: 931
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewToCA View Post
This was so predictable:

The new cost for the total project — originally projected at $33.6 billion in 2008 — has been revised to $42.6 billion to adjust for inflation.


Oh yeah, the fares have almost doubled too, but now they are stating the original fare they used to help justify the project was just a "placeholder", not a real fare:

“We basically arbitrarily set that 50 percent ticket price when we first started...Our research tells us that price is artificially low, and that a 75 to 80 percent rate of airplane flights is more widely used. So, we felt an increase in fares was appropriate.”

Fares inflate for high-speed rail | San Francisco Examiner (http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/Fares-inflate-for-high-speed-rail-79376472.html - broken link)
I wish people would have discussed and thought about this more BEFORE the bond was voted on. Oh well...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2009, 09:22 PM
 
12,823 posts, read 24,406,112 times
Reputation: 11042
I voted no.

I vote no on most bonds, as a rule of thumb.

But this one in particular warranted my no vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:51 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top