Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Charlotte
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-23-2013, 12:57 PM
 
Location: Charlotte
1,355 posts, read 2,678,308 times
Reputation: 639

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by afonega1 View Post

You are just the biggest hater I have ever seen on any of these boards.
You're in the Charlotte forum?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-23-2013, 01:29 PM
 
15,355 posts, read 12,638,570 times
Reputation: 7571
A lot of people brought up ATL to prove the olympics was a failure but as soon as people provide information that suggest otherwise its time to stop talking about ATL...

We have enough colleges in the region (Charlotte, Triangle and SC to make use of the structures that would be built for certain events.

Is it a long shot? Sure... but its not impossible when you add 11 years to the equation. A lot of people who say its a pipe dream probably said the same thing about the DNC. Its not like the Olympics would all take place inside of 485.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2013, 01:37 PM
 
3,914 posts, read 4,968,976 times
Reputation: 1272
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feltdesigner View Post
A lot of people brought up ATL to prove the olympics was a failure but as soon as people provide information that suggest otherwise its time to stop talking about ATL...
But there was no suggestion that we stop talking about ATL Olympics relative to Charlotte's bid. There is a difference.

If you want to bring the DNC into this, then I will point out that it failed at the stated reason for bringing it Charlotte. That is to keep NC a Blue state. As we know, it failed on that one. This should be a lesson, since you brought it up, that wild claims for the reasons to bring an event to an area, often don't come true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2013, 01:40 PM
 
Location: Atlanta ,GA
9,067 posts, read 15,786,473 times
Reputation: 2980
Quote:
Originally Posted by fltonc12 View Post
You're in the Charlotte forum?
Im in a Charlotte forum because I was curious.Just as I thought ,Atlanta is mentioned in many of your threads.Go to the Atlanta forum and its rare to hear mention of Charlotte being talk about in such depth like you guys do about Atlanta.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2013, 01:50 PM
 
Location: Atlanta ,GA
9,067 posts, read 15,786,473 times
Reputation: 2980
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feltdesigner View Post
A lot of people brought up ATL to prove the olympics was a failure but as soon as people provide information that suggest otherwise its time to stop talking about ATL...

We have enough colleges in the region (Charlotte, Triangle and SC to make use of the structures that would be built for certain events.

Is it a long shot? Sure... but its not impossible when you add 11 years to the equation. A lot of people who say its a pipe dream probably said the same thing about the DNC. Its not like the Olympics would all take place inside of 485.
Again how can you talk about something and compare when the info your argument is based on why Charlotte should not have Olympics, when some of you have been incorrect about how the Olympics went over?How can fabricated tales help Charlotte make a well thought out decision about what to do?

You are making this about "one upping" Atlanta by talking about how many colleges you have in the Region.!Thats NOT the point.
Have you been to Atlanta?Does not sound like it.The colleges that we are talking about are all in a compact area of each other and within easy access to transit(MARTA).All within Downtown and Midtown.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2013, 02:24 PM
 
37,875 posts, read 41,896,305 times
Reputation: 27266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feltdesigner View Post
A lot of people brought up ATL to prove the olympics was a failure but as soon as people provide information that suggest otherwise its time to stop talking about ATL...

We have enough colleges in the region (Charlotte, Triangle and SC to make use of the structures that would be built for certain events.

Is it a long shot? Sure... but its not impossible when you add 11 years to the equation. A lot of people who say its a pipe dream probably said the same thing about the DNC. Its not like the Olympics would all take place inside of 485.
But come on man, you just can't compare the DNC to the Olympics. The DNC is more noted for being a high profile event, but in terms of actual tourist impact, it's not really all that high; it only attracted 35,000 visitors and just needed a handful of venues. The Olympics attracts over half a million people over 2-3 weeks and needs many more venues and hotel rooms, and that's just for starters. To be generous, say that that part gets figured out and more hotels are built. There's no way the transportation network will be up to par in 11 years, and honestly it might not be ever with LRT as the mode of rail-based transit as opposed to HRT.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2013, 02:51 PM
 
3,914 posts, read 4,968,976 times
Reputation: 1272
^Actually the Olympics specified their technical requirements for hotel rooms, venues, transit, etc and are looking for Charlotte's response to it. Obviously if they can't meet these requirements then they will say so.

"There's no way the transportation network will be up to par in 11 years, and honestly it might not be ever with LRT as the mode of rail-based transit as opposed to HRT".


SLC got by fine with their LRT, and they had far less issues than ATL.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2013, 02:56 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
7,582 posts, read 10,764,755 times
Reputation: 6572
Quote:
Originally Posted by frewroad View Post
SLC got by fine with their LRT, and they had far less issues than ATL.
But the Winter Olympic games aren't near as big and don't attract near as many people either. They also are more spread out as most events require being in a large more natural atmosphere (sledding, skiing, etc..)

That has been a pretty common trend for a long time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2013, 03:05 PM
 
37,875 posts, read 41,896,305 times
Reputation: 27266
Quote:
Originally Posted by frewroad View Post
^Actually the Olympics specified their technical requirements for hotel rooms, venues, transit, etc and are looking for Charlotte's response to it. Obviously if they can't meet these requirements then they will say so.

"There's no way the transportation network will be up to par in 11 years, and honestly it might not be ever with LRT as the mode of rail-based transit as opposed to HRT".


SLC got by fine with their LRT, and they had far less issues than ATL.
Summer Olympics >>>>> Winter Olympics

Come on dude, you should know at least this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2013, 03:10 PM
 
3,914 posts, read 4,968,976 times
Reputation: 1272
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwkimbro View Post
But the Winter Olympic games aren't near as big and don't attract near as many people either. .....
Hmm. SLC made far more money than the Olympics in ATL. However this theory about HRT being a requirement is nonsense. The 1984 Summer Olympics, no doubt the most successful Olympics in the USA since the 1980s, were held at the time when Los Angeles had no rail transit system. Yet these games are very highly regarded, unlike some that followed.

I think Charlotte will be fine if it chooses to hold the Olympics. I hope it doesn't because I think the whole thing is nonsense, but if this city and state decides to pursue it, it has shown that it can pull these sorts of things off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Charlotte

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top