Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The only paper I'm aware of from him (Mutagenesis in Physalis pubescens L. ssp. floridana) was published in an obscure journal (Floriculture and Ornamental Biotechnology), mentioned ID as just one hypothesis, and hardly discusses ID (so the paper is hardly pro ID). The paper does link to many pro-ID references, including papers by people such as Behe, Dembski and Meyer, which suggests the reviewers of the paper did not do a good job of peer review.
I gave the name of his book in English though it is only available in German. Facts are what is important not what some believe. He gave the facts and more and more Biologists and geneticists see it as well. It eliminates Evolution from the equation. Hard for believers in the Evolution faith to accept, but pure science.
The title "Intelligent Design theorists" skews the question, Eusebius because they are part of an established fraud exposed at Dover. The Intelligent Design Institute and Creationists were shown to be religious groups pretending to be objective scientists. Unfortunately, those religious groups tend to mistakenly believe that evolution is anti-God. It is NOT . . . but they know so little about it . . . they cannot be reasoned with.
Interesting that Antony Flew sided with the Intelligent Design theorists and he was not a Christian.
I gave the name of his book in English though it is only available in German. Facts are what is important not what some believe. He gave the facts and more and more Biologists and geneticists see it as well. It eliminates Evolution from the equation. Hard for believers in the Evolution faith to accept, but pure science.
No true transition from-to anything has been found, EVERY find is complete and fully functional.
Errr yes, that is what evolution claims. There is no expectation for us to find a not fully functional fossil. And in fact we are rife with transitional forms despite your claim we are not. The evolutionary Pathway of the Whale for example shows this.
Quote:
Originally Posted by expatCA
DNA proves Evolution as popularly believed and taught is not possible.
How so?
Quote:
Originally Posted by expatCA
DNA shows structure and design that requires a designer.
Quite the assertion, but assertion appears to be all it is. You have certainly not substantiated this sentence in any way I have seen. And the sentence appears to the core of everything else you have written on the thread. So it bears substantiating. Perhaps you mean to get around to it?
bull sit-ups fly .... yeah whoooo! I am saved!!!! I knew it would some day,
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
!
