Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which is more urban and has more of a "big city" feel?
Houston 69 29.11%
Seattle 168 70.89%
Voters: 237. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 08-22-2010, 08:49 PM
 
Location: Nashville, Tn.
47 posts, read 199,771 times
Reputation: 29

Advertisements

they both have a big city feel, but picture Seattle like New York, conjested and urban, while Houston is more like L.A., or Atlanta, much more spread out, but with GIANT 16-18 lane freeways, with huge interchanges that lead from the many suburbs to the intercity. If i had to choose it would be Houston in a hearbeat. Seattle has horrible weather, and Houston has amazing weather. The Texas pride, and local atmosphire of Texas is amazing.

 
Old 08-22-2010, 08:51 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,943,565 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by killakoolaide View Post
Houston is one of the least urban big cities in America. Most of America's suburbs are more urban.

Its a nice place, but urban, it is not. In fairness, it has pockets of urbanity, but so does everywhere else.

Its dishonest to describe Houston as one of America's "Biggest" cities, with 40% of its metro population within its city limits taking up over 600 sq. miles, its not a very metropolitan city.

why would it be dishonest to describe Houston as one of america's biggest cities when Houston has the 4th largest GDP, Why would it be dishonest when Houston has the 3rd tallest skyline in the US. why would be dishonest when Houston has 2 of the top 50 busiest airports in the US. why would it be dishonest when Houston has the busiest port in the country by tonnage?

What does its size have to do with its economic output? what does its size have to do with how tall its buildings are? what does its size have to do with the number of containers entering its port? what does its size have to do with the number of people going through its airports?

Houston is the 4th largest city n the US because it is strong in every field.

Seattle has modest factors at best in everything. You mean to tell me Seattle is a bigger city because the buildings are closer together? how laughable.

You guys are making me slam one of my favorite cities in the country
 
Old 08-22-2010, 08:53 PM
 
Location: America
5,092 posts, read 8,845,790 times
Reputation: 1971
Quote:
Originally Posted by killakoolaide View Post
Houston is one of the least urban big cities in America. Most of America's suburbs are more urban.
proof of this, please?
 
Old 08-22-2010, 08:55 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,943,565 times
Reputation: 7752
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Loney View Post
You're kidding right? Go back and actually read the thread.

show me one. YOu said everybody, I dare you to show me one person from Houston who said that
 
Old 08-22-2010, 11:37 PM
 
1,717 posts, read 4,649,491 times
Reputation: 979
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
show me one. YOu said everybody,
WTF are you talking about?
 
Old 08-22-2010, 11:53 PM
 
1,717 posts, read 4,649,491 times
Reputation: 979
Quote:
Originally Posted by HtownLove View Post
there you go again. I asked you where did anyone say it was more urban. no one did. so you are laughing at something no one said.
Go back and actually read what I said. Stop embarrassing yourself. I didn't claim anyone said that Houston was more urban. Here is what i said.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Loney
What's funnier is folks from Houston suggesting its downtown has an urban feel. As aforementioned, the lights go out at 6pm.

Quote:
show me one. YOu said everybody, I dare you to show me one person from Houston who said that
Do you normally just make **** up as you go along?
 
Old 08-23-2010, 02:15 AM
 
Location: Irvine So. Cal
62 posts, read 79,987 times
Reputation: 60
Probably Seattle!
 
Old 08-23-2010, 08:08 AM
 
Location: Pasadena
882 posts, read 2,245,331 times
Reputation: 466
First of all, what the hell do you consider urban.
This is the definition:
Quote:
  /ˈɜrbən/ Show Spelled[ur-buhn] Show IPA

–adjective 1. of, pertaining to, or designating a city or town.

2. living in a city.

3. characteristic of or accustomed to cities; citified: He is an urban type.
Now, in the real sense that should make all cities urban, but you CD density walkable people, whatever, stretch the definition where urban = Boston, which means calling Houston urban would be a false statement, I agree in that sense. But Downtown Houston is urban, it is less so than in many other places, it is less vibrant than in many other places, but its still urban. I mean name one concrete GENERAL thing that you can do in downtown Seattle that you CAN'T do in downtown Houston. There won't be a long list. There will be more options in DT Seattle.

Heres an example.
  • I can buy an outfit and shoes. You can do that in both downtowns. However, there isn't as many stores and retailers in DT Houston.
Heres a non-example.
  • I can't buy an Nordstrom outfit in downtown Houston. Like I said, stick to general points, no specifics, or things like I can't be surrounded by people as I stroll from street to street. We all know DT Houston isn't virbrant.
Now considering you can do the same general things, for the most part, I'd consider DT Houston urban. Stop confusing vibrancy with urbanity. A downtown doesn't have to be vibrant to be urban. A downtown can have parking lots and be urban.
 
Old 08-23-2010, 08:13 AM
 
1,717 posts, read 4,649,491 times
Reputation: 979
Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthmoreAve View Post
I mean name one concrete GENERAL thing that you can do in downtown Seattle that you CAN'T do in downtown Houston.
Get a great cup of espresso or coffee.
 
Old 08-23-2010, 09:02 AM
 
Location: The City
22,378 posts, read 38,910,924 times
Reputation: 7976
Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthmoreAve View Post

from street to street. We all know DT Houston isn't virbrant.
Now considering you can do the same general things, for the most part, I'd consider DT Houston urban. Stop confusing vibrancy with urbanity. A downtown doesn't have to be vibrant to be urban. A downtown can have parking lots and be urban.

I think you make a pretty good point, a place can be urban without vibrancy, true in every city in America.

But I also think in the traditional sense a city should have that (vibrancy), especially at the core, that next level down in vibrancy feels very suburban to me and is so indistinguishable from everyplace else, which in many ways much of Houston (even in the city) feels like. So this leads to many people calling/associating Houston with being suburban, because it looks and feels like what many people associate as suburban, not in total but most of what is considered the city based on the borders. And I guess why I know personally I feel like I have trouble finding the urban part of houston, even areas with tall buildings that exist in many areas of the city, I still feel like I am in the burbs or a perimeter city, thus it feels that next level down in urbanity or suburban. And this is not everywhere, but it feels disjointed and lacks the cohesiveness that add to vibrancy. And again this is not to say there are no urban areas in Houston, they just seem so pocketed and that again to me feels suburban, that is similar to the suburban makeup that I am used to, pockets of urbanity sorrounded by suburbia just on a larger scale with taller buildings, this is the general vibe I get, and why I think urban does not jump to mind with a city of this type of makeup.

And again this is not to say there are no urban areas, because there are, and honestly the downtown would never be mistaken for not being urban, lacking continuous vibrancy, maybe but even that is getting better

maybe it is my flaw where I equate vibrancy with urbanity, or I was just conditioned as a child based on the 3 cities I knew best NYC, Philly and DC, dunno

Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top