Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I want to see which one will get Philly, and I found San Antonio, San Diego, and Dallas. Since San Diego was where I lived , I chose San Diego. I wanted to see if San Diego can pass Philly (7th again ) in the next 20 years . San Jose also can pass Philly in 25 years and so.
Philadelphia (1.55m)
San Antonio (1.45m)
San Diego (1.4m)
Dallas (1.35m)
San Jose (1.05m)
Option A: San Diego could be way over Philly
Option B: Close: San Diego more populated
Option C: Close: Philly more population
Option D: Philly could still be more population by 100,000
I will put in San Diego more populated; but rather close (San Diego could be at 1.75m and Philly could be at 1.7m)
Happy Posting!!!
JanGomez27
P.S. Give your opinion for other cities like ones posted above.
Last edited by boltsfanofsdpop1376; 08-18-2010 at 08:14 PM..
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,138 posts, read 16,058,371 times
Reputation: 4047
Lol hi.
They're both such slow growers though (presently), San Diego has always been a city that has never cared about growth at all, and I love that about San Diego. Philadelphia is the only city along with New York City that has always been in the top 10 largest since the US Census was created.
But in my opinion, San Diego will pass Philadelphia up someday in the next 25-30 years. (if current trends continue)
I want to see which one will get Philly, and I found San Antonio, San Diego, and Dallas. Since San Diego was where I lived . I wanted to see if San Diego can pass Philly (7th again ) in the next 20 years . San Jose also can pass Philly in 25 years and so.
Philadelphia (1.55m)
San Antonio (1.45m)
San Diego (1.4m)
Dallas (1.35m)
San Jose (1.05m)
Option A: San Diego could be way over Philly
Option B: Close: San Diego more populated
Option C: Close: Philly more population
Option D: Philly could still be more population by 100,000
I will put in San Diego more populated; but rather close (San Diego could be at 1.75m and Philly could be at 1.7m)
1. New York 8.09m
2. Los Angeles 3.8m
3. Chicago 3.1m
4. Houston 2.78m
5. Philadelphia 1.62m
6. Phoenix 1.54m (alredy is in 5th)
7. San Antonio 1.5m
8. San Diego 1.4m
9. Dallas 1.32m
10. Detroit 1m
What is this, you say? It gives you a look of the cities that are catching up to Philly (in red) in year of 2004.
1. New York 8.09m
2. Los Angeles 3.8m
3. Chicago 3.1m
4. Houston 2.78m
5. Philadelphia 1.62m
6. Phoenix 1.54m (alredy is in 5th)
7. San Antonio 1.5m
8. San Diego 1.4m
9. Dallas 1.32m
10. Detroit 1m
What is this, you say? It gives you a look of the cities that are catching up to Philly (in red) in year of 2004.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.