Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-05-2012, 03:40 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,526,972 times
Reputation: 21239

Advertisements

Here are the estimates for the 12 largest areas in the country(11 CSAs with 5 Million+ persons and the Miami MSA)

Area/Annual Numerical Growth/Annual Percent Growth
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA +204,563 +1.1%
Dallas-Ft Worth, TX +156,066 +2.3%
Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV +145,112 +1.7%
Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX +140,071 +2.3%
New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA +128,434 +0.5%
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL +105,490 +1.9%
San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA +95,070 +1.2%
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL +93,717 +1.6%
Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI +43,804 +0.4%
Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-RI-NH +42,001 +0.5%
Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD +28,604 +0.4%
Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI -11,418 -0.2%

Its like we don't know what to believe since these estimates were proven wrong when the actual census was taken. I think they should just have a census every year. lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2012, 03:41 PM
 
Location: Maryland
4,675 posts, read 7,405,419 times
Reputation: 5363
Quote:
Originally Posted by Broadrippleguy View Post
lol @ Crook County Illinois growing.
i honestly dont believe the census gets it.
Even Chicagoans call it Crook County. so why in the world would i live in that high tax/messed up county?
Heck the suburban counties are way more desirable than Crook County so i bet Crook County is losing population well the suburbs are gaining population.
It's pretty clear that you don't, so is there a need to comment? Does every single forum have to be a place for you to air your grievances about Chicago...?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2012, 03:56 PM
 
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,128 posts, read 7,568,606 times
Reputation: 5785
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Here are the estimates for the 12 largest areas in the country(11 CSAs with 5 Million+ persons and the Miami MSA)

Area/Annual Numerical Growth/Annual Percent Growth
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Riverside, CA +204,563 +1.1%
Dallas-Ft Worth, TX +156,066 +2.3%
Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV +145,112 +1.7%
Houston-Baytown-Huntsville, TX +140,071 +2.3%
New York-Newark-Bridgeport, NY-NJ-CT-PA +128,434 +0.5%
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL +105,490 +1.9%
San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA +95,070 +1.2%
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Gainesville, GA-AL +93,717 +1.6%
Chicago-Naperville-Michigan City, IL-IN-WI +43,804 +0.4%
Boston-Worcester-Manchester, MA-RI-NH +42,001 +0.5%
Philadelphia-Camden-Vineland, PA-NJ-DE-MD +28,604 +0.4%
Detroit-Warren-Flint, MI -11,418 -0.2%

Its like we don't know what to believe since these estimates were proven wrong when the actual census was taken. I think they should just have a census every year. lol

I'm sorry, I'm lazy, has anyone done the math on the CSA numbers based on these numbers?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2012, 04:05 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,526,972 times
Reputation: 21239
Quote:
Originally Posted by the resident09 View Post
I'm sorry, I'm lazy, has anyone done the math on the CSA numbers based on these numbers?
You can access numbers for all MSAs and CSAs from the OPs link here:
Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas Totals: Vintage 2011 - U.S Census Bureau
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2012, 06:46 PM
 
Location: Up on the moon laughing down on you
18,495 posts, read 32,953,051 times
Reputation: 7752
Okay, after reading the methodology, I can't help but take the info with a grain of salt.

Quote:
To produce annual state and county total population estimates, we begin by producing county level estimates for two age groups: population aged 0 to 64 and population aged 65 and older.
Starting with the county-specific base population by age group as of April 1, 2010, we calculate the population as of July 1, 2010 using a component of change method.

We first estimate the household population at risk of migrating into or out of each county between April 1 and June 30, 2010. Then, we multiply this population by the net domestic migration rates for the household population in each age group to estimate the county-specific net household domestic migration. We use the births, deaths, net international migration, and net
domestic migration (of both the household and GQ populations) to estimate the resident population in each age group. Finally, we control the county population estimates by age group to the national resident population estimates for these age groups and repeat this process to estimate the July 1, 2011 resident population for each county.

The total resident population for each county is the sum of the populations in the two age groups.
The resident population estimates and components of change for each state are simply the sum of the populations and components of change for its counties.
too much math instead of hard data goes into the calculation. It also requires estimates on too many levels
http://www.census.gov/popest/methodo...st-co-meth.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2012, 10:16 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia, PA
8,700 posts, read 14,698,612 times
Reputation: 3668
I don't even care who passes Philly anymore... I'm just so happy we're finally growing again
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2012, 10:35 PM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,632 posts, read 13,000,665 times
Reputation: 5766
Quote:
Originally Posted by Summersm343 View Post
I don't even care who passes Philly anymore... I'm just so happy we're finally growing again
Hopefully if were lucky the Philly MSA/CSA will be able to add some counties when the next OMB statistics are release. Either way I'm glad to see the city is continuing to grow after 60 years of population decline. That itself was a huge accomplishment for the city to overcome.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2012, 01:12 AM
 
Location: Savannah, GA
4,582 posts, read 8,973,624 times
Reputation: 2421
Can someone explain to me how Charlton County, Georgia became the #1 fastest growing county in the country by percentage (during said time frame)?

This boggles me to no end.. There is nothing there but the Okefenokee Swamp & no fast access to Jacksonville, the nearest city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2012, 09:00 AM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,747,384 times
Reputation: 17398
Quote:
Originally Posted by WanderingImport View Post
Can someone explain to me how Charlton County, Georgia became the #1 fastest growing county in the country by percentage (during said time frame)?

This boggles me to no end.. There is nothing there but the Okefenokee Swamp & no fast access to Jacksonville, the nearest city.
You just answered your own question. When you're dealing with small numbers, a small change in the number can still equal a large change in percentage. Hell, if one person lives in an area, and then a second person moves in, then the population of the area just increased by 100%.

By the way, you can get to Jacksonville from Charlton County in 30 minutes via U.S. 1.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2012, 10:51 AM
 
11,289 posts, read 26,199,461 times
Reputation: 11355
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLAXTOR121 View Post
Chicago may be growing again according to the link by the OP. It shows Cook county growing By 22k which declined in the 2000's because of Chicago. Also seems Miami is growing faster now than even the 2000s decade
It looks like Illinois is actually losing population outside of the Chicago area (which grew by 42,000 people last year). Also interesting that over half of that growth is in the central Cook County, with a lot of the former fast growing exurban areas really shutting down. Hopefully the fairly new Prez of the County can help keep turning things around. I already applaud her for lowering sales taxes, attacking a lot of corruption and finally getting a solid budget in place for 2011 that didn't involve hiking tons of county property taxes or taking out debt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top