Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-28-2012, 07:15 PM
 
Location: Austin, Texas
1,985 posts, read 3,318,930 times
Reputation: 1705

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by westhou View Post
I was just joking with you.

You mentioned the OP should pick Milwaukee because they had a lot of outdoor activities and down to earth people. Well Houston definitely has a lot of outdoor activities so that only leaves......well you get where I'm going.

I know that's not what you meant. Just having a little fun with it.
Of course Houston has those things, I just thought that the OP would do better picking Milwaukee for those things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-28-2012, 09:51 PM
 
1,534 posts, read 2,772,002 times
Reputation: 3603
I am surprised by the advice on this thread. Houston is fifty miles from the Gulf of Mexico, and while the Texas coast is pretty ugly until you get down to South Padre, the reason it is ugly is because the silt from the Mississippi flows west which means you have some of the most nutrient rich salt water in the western hemisphere. Fishing on the Texas gulf coast is spectacular and is in an entirely different league to fishing in Lake Michigan. Just ask the pelicans. You can swim, sail, fish from Houston year round. For year round outdoor activities Houston is way better than Milwaukee. Plus it is a much larger and more diverse city with MUCH better restaurants, universities, cultural amenities of every kind, theatre, fine arts, music etc. To get anything equivalent in Milwaukee you would have to drive to Chicago. In Houston, you also have to drive, most of it is pedestrian unfriendly, but you don't have to drive to a whole other city. I would rather live in Chicago than Houston (except for November to April), but Houston has quite a lot more going on than Milwaukee at around the same price if not cheaper. Houston in a no brainer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top