Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: New York City vs San Francisco
New York 310 56.36%
San Francisco 240 43.64%
Voters: 550. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-09-2014, 03:08 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,087 posts, read 34,676,186 times
Reputation: 15068

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LiveFrom215 View Post
In Montclairs world, the relative statistical parity between San Francisco, Boston, and Philly=a slam dunk victory for SF. But; the merciless smackdown SF gets from NYC, London, Paris (and L.A.) on the exact same statistical categories somehow means that SF is superior to Paris, et al.
That's because Bay Area posters--and posters from any city, really--have no problem lording their alleged superiority over other cities. But when it comes to NYC, it's "no fair!" Why should we be deprived of the joy of giving a beatdown?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-09-2014, 03:17 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,126 posts, read 39,337,475 times
Reputation: 21202
Quote:
Originally Posted by anonelitist View Post
The following posters should just be embarrassed at this point:

18montclair
BajanYankee
qworldorder
OyCrumbler


The last 48 pages have been just from the past week and have been the most childish online tit for tat I have personally ever not read. If you guys seriously don't have jobs, I hate to say it, but the rather idiotic and often violent protests occurring in major cities throughout the US would be more productive than sitting around here and posting on this thread on C-D.
I'm pretty happy about this. Please, cite what I've said that's unreasonable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2014, 03:18 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,087 posts, read 34,676,186 times
Reputation: 15068
Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
I'm pretty happy about this. Please, cite what I've said that's unreasonable.
Me too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2014, 03:21 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,087 posts, read 34,676,186 times
Reputation: 15068
A 100 vote lead! We're awesome!!!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AIRQZAgtaE
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2014, 03:23 PM
 
1,353 posts, read 1,642,069 times
Reputation: 817
Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
I'm pretty happy about this. Please, cite what I've said that's unreasonable.
I literally don't have the time or desire to read. I check in occasionally and see a bunch of YouTube posts by New York posters, a bunch of stuff on AT Kearney, and a bunch of random stats from 18Montclair. All of it meaningless, dull, and boring to myself. Unreasonable is a different thing...I'd rather a discussion be controversial and unreasonable, but interesting and informative, than totally reasonable and boring. As this one has been.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2014, 03:26 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,476,702 times
Reputation: 21228
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
A.T. Kearney Global Cities Index (2014)

1. New York (61.7) *Yay!*
2. London (58.1)
3. Paris (52.3)
4. Tokyo (47.2)
5. Hong Kong (41.3)
6. Los Angeles (38.0)
7. Chicago (36.8)
8. Beijing (35.1)
9. Singapore (34.3)
10. Washington (33.4)
11. Brussels (32.9)
12. Seoul (32.6)
13. Toronto (32.4)
14. Sydney (32.3)
15. Madrid (31.8)
16. Vienna (30.3)
17. Moscow (29.5)
18. Shanghai (29.4)
19. Berlin (29.4)
20. Buenos Aires (28.9)
21. Boston (28.6)
22. San Francisco (27.2)
23. Frankfurt (26.7)
24. Barcelona (26.7)
25. Amsterdam (26.3)

http://www.atkearney.com/documents/1...6-4c8eaf984cd5
That's neither about power nor influence, like this:

Quote:
THE WORLD'S MOST WELL ROUNDED CITIES by GaWC

Five levels of global city are identified. First, and clearly above all others, there are London and New York. All previous
research has highlighted the dominance of these two cities in the world city hierarchy (Taylor 2004a) and they emerge
here as the most important 'all-round' global contributors. They are followed by three cities that make smaller all-round contribution and with particular cultural strengths: Los Angeles, Paris and San Francisco. Finally, among 'all-rounders' there are seven incipient world cities identified in Table 11. In the second category of global niche cities, the
three leading Pacific Asian cities are critical economic nodes in the world city network and there are also three critical
nodes that are non-economic: Brussels, Geneva and Washington, DC. Thus a total of 18 cities are deemed to be global,
actual or incipient.

The remaining world cities encompass articulator and niche cities. The former are focussed upon subnets and there
are 13 distributed between the three non-economic spheres. Classic examples are Vienna at the centre of a UN
agency subnet and Nairobi at the centre of a NGO subnet. There are 21niche world cities identified of which seven
have important concentrations of economic activities and 14 concentrations of non-economic activities. Frankfurt is
typical of the first group with its concentration of banks while Manila is typical of the second group with its
concentration of NGOs.

These two sets of cities represent the upper echelons of the hierarchical tendencies in world city networks. To reiterate
a point made in the introduction, they do not encompass all globalization processes, all cities as so involved, but they
are the key locales that network formation agents are using in their everyday activities that are creating world city
networks.

GLOBAL CITIES

Well rounded global
Very large contribution: London and New York Smaller contribution and with cultural bias: Los Angeles, Paris and San
Francisco

ii Incipient global cities: Amsterdam, Boston, Chicago, Madrid, Milan, Moscow, Toronto

Global niche cities - specialised global contributions

i Economic: Hong Kong, Singapore, and Tokyo

ii Political and social: Brussels, Geneva, and Washington

WORLD CITIES

Subnet articulator cities

i Cultural: Berlin, Copenhagen, Melbourne, Munich, Oslo, Rome, Stockholm Political: Bangkok, Beijing, Vienna

ii Social: Manila, Nairobi, Ottawa

Worldwide leading cities

i Primarily economic global contributions: Frankfurt, Miami, Munich, Osaka, Singapore, Sydney, Zurich

ii Primarily non-economic global contributions: Abidjan, Addis Ababa, Atlanta, Basle, Barcelona, Cairo, Denver, Harare,
Lyon, Manila, Mexico City, Mumbai, New Delhi, Shanghai

GaWC Research Bulletin 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bajan Yankee

And still beneath NYC.
hahaha I mean jajajaja

You dont get it. I dont need to prove that we're above NYC, only that SF ranks close behind, and boy are there a lot of those. Here's yet another recent one:

Global Financial Centres Index - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2014, 03:29 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,087 posts, read 34,676,186 times
Reputation: 15068
Here's another video. Very a propos. "No Flex. Zone. No Flex. Zone. They know better! They know better!"


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2cQSPRTdhg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2014, 03:35 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,087 posts, read 34,676,186 times
Reputation: 15068
"So in summation, I don't even know who you racin'. We already crossed the finish line backwards with the flag wavin'."

~Jay-Z

We're already home.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2014, 03:39 PM
 
Location: LBC
4,156 posts, read 5,558,624 times
Reputation: 3594
Quote:
Originally Posted by anonelitist View Post
I literally don't have the time or desire to read. I check in occasionally and see a bunch of YouTube posts by New York posters, a bunch of stuff on AT Kearney, and a bunch of random stats from 18Montclair. All of it meaningless, dull, and boring to myself. Unreasonable is a different thing...I'd rather a discussion be controversial and unreasonable, but interesting and informative, than totally reasonable and boring. As this one has been.
You clearly have no idea how this works.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKRDr5Gwn0k
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2014, 03:50 PM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,653 posts, read 67,476,702 times
Reputation: 21228
Quote:
Originally Posted by anonelitist View Post
The following posters should just be embarrassed at this point:
You forgot one.

There. Fixed it.
Quote:
18Montclair
Bajan Yankee
qworldorder
OyCrumbler
Yo Momma
FYI-This forum is not titled The Gospel According to St. Anonelitist
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top