Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: More economically relevant state in the future
California 195 56.85%
Texas 148 43.15%
Voters: 343. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-12-2013, 02:55 PM
 
92 posts, read 137,702 times
Reputation: 65

Advertisements

The trajectory of both states, seemingly, seems to be going in different directions. While California is still growing, the growth rate of the area has become dependent on immigrants and money from abroad to stay afloat, while Texas has been exploding for the past 20 years from domestic AND international sources. Before, Texas and California could not be mentioned in the same breath, as California has and is the #1 state right now, while Texas was playing catch up. However, nowadays there are articles predicting the rise of Texas and the complete collapse of California, along with the unwillingness of Americans to move to California. Which one of these states is going to be more relevant in the future? Criteria include economic prospects (which one will be more relevant economically), culturally, politically, world stature, diversity, and anything else relevant to the future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-12-2013, 03:18 PM
 
Location: The city of champions
1,830 posts, read 2,151,706 times
Reputation: 1338
Easily California. The only thing keeping Texas somewhat competative is the low cost of living which will certainly rise. There's really nothing about Texas that would be appealing to me other than that. I guess less red tape too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2013, 03:18 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
5,294 posts, read 10,209,468 times
Reputation: 2136
California. Los Angeles is the 2nd biggest city in the USA, the 2nd biggest GDP in the USA (only NYC's is bigger) and the third biggest GDP in the world (after Tokyo and NYC). It's not going anywhere soon. In addition, the San Francisco Bay Area has a lot to offer in terms of the economy, with its computer industry, and I believe Sacramento does as well. Tourism is definitely much bigger in CA than TX as well. The only place in Texas I can see tourists going is San Antonio, for the history. And maybe spring breakers in SPI. But CA has LA, San Diego, San Francisco, Palm Springs, Wine Country, and Sacramento, all of which bring in loads of tourists. Plus, Big Sur and Monterey.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2013, 03:20 PM
 
92 posts, read 137,702 times
Reputation: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Illusive Man View Post
Easily California. The only thing keeping Texas somewhat competative is the low cost of living which will certainly rise. There's really nothing about Texas that would be appealing to me other than that. I guess less red tape too.
No WONDER California license plates are everywhere in Texas. You think everyone wants to pay an arm and a leg to live in a state where you're living paycheck by paycheck? Look at the City Data Texas forum and how many Californians are flooding this state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2013, 03:22 PM
 
1,660 posts, read 2,534,651 times
Reputation: 2163
Gonna have to go with California in this one. Don't hear much about Texas around here other than bad stuff. Plus the cowboys stink and the miners are peaking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2013, 03:22 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,516 posts, read 33,551,374 times
Reputation: 12157
This is the third thread on this similar topic. It's getting old. Oh and California wins.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2013, 03:29 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
1,535 posts, read 2,373,249 times
Reputation: 1604
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zedd Spectrum View Post
No WONDER California license plates are everywhere in Texas. You think everyone wants to pay an arm and a leg to live in a state where you're living paycheck by paycheck? Look at the City Data Texas forum and how many Californians are flooding this state.
They are crawling all over Atlanta, a lot of it is the film industry here too. People are leaving LA for that reason, not all, but many. They are passing through Texas on I-20 to Atlanta.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2013, 03:32 PM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,516 posts, read 33,551,374 times
Reputation: 12157
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigstick View Post
They are crawling all over Atlanta, a lot of it is the film industry here too. People are leaving LA for that reason, not all, but many. They are passing through Texas on I-20 to Atlanta.
Yeah people in the film industry maybe. Not most though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2013, 03:41 PM
 
Location: The city of champions
1,830 posts, read 2,151,706 times
Reputation: 1338
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zedd Spectrum View Post
No WONDER California license plates are everywhere in Texas. You think everyone wants to pay an arm and a leg to live in a state where you're living paycheck by paycheck? Look at the City Data Texas forum and how many Californians are flooding this state.
That's good. I'm glad, more opportunties for me. The only reason they are going there is the cost of living. That's it, there's no other reason. Texas needs bend over and give as many incentives as possible for people to go there, otherwise it would be dead zone. Even then, I still see Texas plates in my city. California doesn't need to bend over to compete, it's far ahead regardless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-12-2013, 05:12 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,153 posts, read 39,404,784 times
Reputation: 21252
It depends on how far into the future you're projecting (and the further you project, the less likely you'll be right). Texas won't be passing California in the near future but decades from now it's certainly possible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:25 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top