Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-17-2013, 01:37 PM
 
Location: Hell, NY
3,181 posts, read 5,176,285 times
Reputation: 5704

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigstick View Post
For Atlanta not to have another MAJOR city included in its CSA, that figure is amazing.

That's because Atlanta isn't really near any major cities. Plus, Atlanta's main population comes from their massive miles of suburbs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-17-2013, 01:39 PM
 
Location: Hell, NY
3,181 posts, read 5,176,285 times
Reputation: 5704
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwillyfromphilly View Post
Allentown and it's immediate areas probably have a very low commuter rate to the New York MSA. So in a sense I can understand your argument on that part but that fact remains that the Lehigh Valley MSA includes Warren County, NJ and that county was able to reach the CSA threshold with the NYC area while still maintaining the 25% MSA threshold for the Allentown MSA. If trends continue the way they are, Philly and NYC will combine into one CSA in the near future(if not already in some cases).

The Los Angeles CSA will most likely surpass the New York CSA in population and GDP as well in the next 20 years if Philly isn't added to the New York CSA. So even from a conspiracy perspective it makes a lot of sense.

How the heck do you figure that? The job market in LA is awful. Even their main industry (the entertainment industry) is finding it hard to make movies there. There already significantly less than NYC now and even if you added San Diego which is further away and less continuous growth than NYC to Philly, even without Philly added NYC still will have more people. Care to elaborate on that one, or is that just wishful thinking?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2013, 01:48 PM
 
Location: LBC
4,156 posts, read 5,591,209 times
Reputation: 3594
Quote:
Originally Posted by supermanpansy View Post
How the heck do you figure that? The job market in LA is awful. Even their main industry (the entertainment industry) is finding it hard to make movies there. There already significantly less than NYC now and even if you added San Diego which is further away and less continuous growth than NYC to Philly, even without Philly added NYC still will have more people. Care to elaborate on that one, or is that just wishful thinking?
You really think entertainment is the main industry?

Largest Industries in Los Angeles County | Statistic Brain
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2013, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,634 posts, read 13,068,127 times
Reputation: 5776
Quote:
Originally Posted by supermanpansy View Post
How the heck do you figure that? The job market in LA is awful. Even their main industry (the entertainment industry) is finding it hard to make movies there. There already significantly less than NYC now and even if you added San Diego which is further away and less continuous growth than NYC to Philly, even without Philly added NYC still will have more people. Care to elaborate on that one, or is that just wishful thinking?
As for as figures go, I'm basing it on the stats 18Monclair provided for all of us. There is no denying that the Los Angeles area is definitely closing the gap between the two cities. If NYC didn't add places like Allentown to it's CSA, LA would be even more closer to surpassing it.

1. New York-Newark, NY-NJ-CT-PA CSA $1.358 Trillion
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT Metro Area $86.338 Billion
Kingston, NY Metro Area $4.829 Billion
New Haven-Milford, CT Metro Area $40.084 Billion
New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA Metro Area $1,358,416 Billion
Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY Metro Area: No Data


2. Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA CSA $918.834 Billion
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA Metro Area $765.759 Billion
Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA Metro Area $39.077 Billion
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA Metro Area $113.998 Billion

Even if San Diego was added, it would boost the LA CSA to over $1 Trillion in GDP. LA is also growing at a faster rate than the New York CSA. LA was only about one county away from surpassing the New York CSA. So it's not as farfetched as you think it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2013, 02:24 PM
 
Location: Hell, NY
3,181 posts, read 5,176,285 times
Reputation: 5704
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwillyfromphilly View Post
As for as figures go, I'm basing it on the stats 18Monclair provided for all of us. There is no denying that the Los Angeles area is definitely closing the gap between the two cities. If NYC didn't add places like Allentown to it's CSA, LA would be even more closer to surpassing it.

1. New York-Newark, NY-NJ-CT-PA CSA $1.358 Trillion
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT Metro Area $86.338 Billion
Kingston, NY Metro Area $4.829 Billion
New Haven-Milford, CT Metro Area $40.084 Billion
New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA Metro Area $1,358,416 Billion
Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY Metro Area: No Data


2. Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA CSA $918.834 Billion
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA Metro Area $765.759 Billion
Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA Metro Area $39.077 Billion
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA Metro Area $113.998 Billion

Even if San Diego was added, it would boost the LA CSA to over $1 Trillion in GDP. LA is also growing at a faster rate than the New York CSA. LA was only about one county away from surpassing the New York CSA. So it's not as farfetched as you think it is.

And if they added San Diego, it still won't matter. If that happens, then NY gets Philly. That adds about six million more to the NY CSA. I just don't get your rationale. It's not like NYC isn't growing and LA is growing leaps and bounds ahead of it. Consider the difference already, then add whatever imaginary number it is that you want to add. It still won't add up. You act like almost four hundred billion isn't significant. It's a major metro in itself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2013, 02:30 PM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,634 posts, read 13,068,127 times
Reputation: 5776
Quote:
Originally Posted by supermanpansy View Post
And if they added San Diego, it still won't matter. If that happens, then NY gets Philly. That adds about six million more to the NY CSA. I just don't get your rationale. It's not like NYC isn't growing and LA is growing leaps and bounds ahead of it. Consider the difference already, then add whatever imaginary number it is that you want to add. It still won't add up. You act like almost four hundred billion isn't significant. It's a major metro in itself.
I don't think your getting the point. It's not about me personally wanting a certain city to surpass another city, I could care less about that honestly. All I'm saying is that LA is closing the gap and could most likely surpass the New York CSA in the next couple of decades.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2013, 02:32 PM
 
14,796 posts, read 17,797,599 times
Reputation: 9252
People really need to look at the real GDP numbers. Real GDP is adjusted for inflation so real GDP is a measure of activity in the economy (not price increases which provide no utility). The vast majority of economists agree that real GDP is a better measure of the economy than nominal GDP. Here are real GDP growth rates for LA and NY MSAs:

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA - 2010 1.1%, 2011 1.2%, 2012 3.1% (three year average 1.8%)
New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA - 2010 3.6%, 2011 1.1%, 2012 1.4% (three year average 2.0%)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2013, 02:34 PM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,634 posts, read 13,068,127 times
Reputation: 5776
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vlajos View Post
People really need to look at the real GDP numbers. Real GDP is adjusted for inflation so real GDP is a measure of activity in the economy (not price increases which provide no utility). The vast majority of economists agree that real GDP is a better measure of the economy than nominal GDP. Here are real GDP growth rates for LA and NY MSAs:

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA - 2010 1.1%, 2011 1.2%, 2012 3.1%
New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA - 2010 3.6%, 2011 1.1%, 2012 1.4%
Even this method shows that LA is growing at a faster rate and the trend will most likely continue in the future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2013, 02:37 PM
 
Location: Hell, NY
3,181 posts, read 5,176,285 times
Reputation: 5704
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwillyfromphilly View Post
I don't think your getting the point. It's not about me personally wanting a certain city to surpass another city, I could care less about that honestly. All I'm saying is that LA is closing the gap and could most likely surpass the New York CSA in the next couple of decades.

Not a chance. NYC and Philly are eventually going to converge. And why the heck shouldn't they? It really is one continuous urban environment. The sole measuring stick for MSA's or CSA's. In my opinion LA has maxed out. They will grow more for their location (Mexico-illegals), but as security gets tougher and deportation takes more of an effect LA will shrink. LA used to have a lot of factory type jobs contrary to what many people think about LA. But that industry has taken a big hit. I just don't see it happening. Add SD to LA and you get around 2-3 million more. Add Philly to NYC and you get 6. LA doesn't really stand a chance. No offense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2013, 02:37 PM
 
14,796 posts, read 17,797,599 times
Reputation: 9252
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwillyfromphilly View Post
Even this method shows that LA is growing at a faster rate and the trend will most likely continue in the future.
Not the three year average.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:48 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top