Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which do you prefer?
Richmond VA 152 54.29%
Raleigh NC 128 45.71%
Voters: 280. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-21-2017, 04:38 PM
 
3,866 posts, read 4,275,871 times
Reputation: 4532

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vatnos View Post
Grace Street has quite a lot more density at present, though I have been in the area recently and it did not seem like a particularly lively place. Many of the retail fronts are underutilized and the activity is not contiguous. I do not think it performs any better than Hillsborough in that sense. I think it is an apt comparison though because both streets have been historic 'spokes' branching off of downtown with a lot of important aspects of each city's identity linked to them, and both are still sort of 'diamonds in the rough'.

Not that Hillsborough is contiguous either... There are gaps between the downtown stretch (which is very underwhelming at the moment, but there are 4 highrises planned), the 1900-2800 stretch for NCSU and the 3700-3800 block of Hillsborough by Meredith College which has Raleigh Brewing Co, and Neomonde. Although worth noting the 1200 block of Hillsborough has now exploded and continues along Morgan Street into downtown on a different branch.

Of all the streets in Raleigh, Hillsborough is the one I would consider "most improved". Feels like a different city than it did several years ago. It is also the one with the most construction planned in the near future.

Raleigh's urban growth will be significantly more impactful, impressive and evident over the next few years versus a city like Richmond which already has a solid urban infrastructure. I prefer the Raleigh area because of what the Triangle offers as a whole. I actually prefer living and hanging out downtown Durham and Chapel Hill, smaller scale with just enough vibrancy to fill an urban void, great restaurants, bars, etc. Ultimately, Raleigh is on the cusp of fulfilling that larger urban Triangle experience, absolutely too much demand/momentum in the area. Still, it'll never have the rust/grit of Richmond which isn't really a necessity. Prime examples are Seattle and Portland that have built solid new urban hoods that could rate with any older historic hood with regard to energy, walkability, vibrancy, etc. I used to spend significant time in Seattle and was always perplexed as to why sunbelt cities struggled with building these kind of neighborhoods. All Raleigh has to do is get it right.

Last edited by Big Aristotle; 03-21-2017 at 04:48 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-21-2017, 05:45 PM
 
Location: North Raleigh x North Sacramento
5,819 posts, read 5,620,852 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vatnos View Post
Grace Street has quite a lot more density at present, though I have been in the area recently and it did not seem like a particularly lively place. Many of the retail fronts are underutilized and the activity is not contiguous. I do not think it performs any better than Hillsborough in that sense.
The activity definitely isn't contigous the length of Grace, but I didn't claim it was, either. Certainly the main half mile to 10-block stretch of both streets, Grace is not underutilized and is resoundingly more vibrant. I don't think this us really a point to be contested but I'll agree to disagree!

@big aristotle, the issue I have with Raleigh is while it is architecturally, structurally, and physically built the sane as Charlotte, there is no true urban neighborhood in Raleigh. There is nothing in Raleigh on the scale of South End, NoDa, etc. There is comparable neighborhoods to Ayrsley, Northgate, etc. The urbanization of Raleigh is just more suburbanization that is building up the core, but not truly urbanizing it. Kind of like what is going on in Metro Atlanta in Gwinnett County...

I can't agree that Raleigh's urbanization will be more impressive when Richmond's urban rebirth will still continue and will resonate more because it functions as a city more than a suburb, with the framework already in place of a city. Most Triangle residents I've seen on CD consider Downtown Durham/Chapel Hill/Carrboro as the urban nodes of the region. Richmond doesn't have that dynamic, yet there still are urban areas outside the city within the metro (like Petersburg)...

At any rate, I get that many people prefer Raleigh. As mentioned before, I enjoy things about Raleigh. The suburbia--Raleigh's "urbanization"--is not one of them, though...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2017, 07:40 AM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,150,335 times
Reputation: 14762
I thought that I'd share this streetview from Google maps that shows just how rapidly Raleigh keeps changing. This particular street is on the SW corner of downtown. https://www.google.com/maps/@35.7738...7i13312!8i6656
This particular short street was very distressed and it turned 180 degrees in a matter of less than two years. Scroll between 2009 and 2011 to see the dramatic shift by virtually traveling the street.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2017, 10:28 AM
 
Location: Durham, NC
1,615 posts, read 1,966,195 times
Reputation: 2194
Quote:
Originally Posted by murksiderock View Post
@big aristotle, the issue I have with Raleigh is while it is architecturally, structurally, and physically built the sane as Charlotte, there is no true urban neighborhood in Raleigh. There is nothing in Raleigh on the scale of South End, NoDa, etc. There is comparable neighborhoods to Ayrsley, Northgate, etc. The urbanization of Raleigh is just more suburbanization that is building up the core, but not truly urbanizing it. Kind of like what is going on in Metro Atlanta in Gwinnett County...
There are urban neighborhoods in the sense of having a walkable, human-scale place that integrates retail, recreation, and residential. The most significant difference between Raleigh and Charlotte is height. The main difference between Raleigh/Charlotte and Richmond is age.

Hillsborough Street is Raleigh's South End. Five Points is Raleigh's NoDa. NoDa is tiny by the way. 2 blocks.

Quote:
Most Triangle residents I've seen on CD consider Downtown Durham/Chapel Hill/Carrboro as the urban nodes of the region. Richmond doesn't have that dynamic, yet there still are urban areas outside the city within the metro (like Petersburg)...
Over downtown Raleigh? That is laughable. I live in Carrboro, and I'm laughing. Chapel Hill/Carrboro have a nice little downtown, punching well above its weight for its size, nowhere close to Raleigh though. Durham has a slightly different set of issues from other NC cities, with a greater trove of historic structures in its core but most are still sitting empty to this day--very much like Richmond on a smaller scale in some ways. It's made strides and has more than Chapel Hill for sure, but probably half as much as Raleigh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2017, 10:32 AM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,679 posts, read 9,378,368 times
Reputation: 7261
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vatnos View Post
There are urban neighborhoods in the sense of having a walkable, human-scale place that integrates retail, recreation, and residential. The most significant difference between Raleigh and Charlotte is height. The main difference between Raleigh/Charlotte and Richmond is age.

Hillsborough Street is Raleigh's South End. Five Points is Raleigh's NoDa. NoDa is tiny by the way. 2 blocks.



Over downtown Raleigh? That is laughable. I live in Carrboro, and I'm laughing. Chapel Hill/Carrboro have a nice little downtown, punching well above its weight for its size, nowhere close to Raleigh though. Durham has a slightly different set of issues from other NC cities, with a greater trove of historic structures in its core but most are still sitting empty to this day--very much like Richmond on a smaller scale in some ways. It's made strides and has more than Chapel Hill for sure, but probably half as much as Raleigh.
What is Durham's issues and why are the buildings sitting empty?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2017, 10:54 AM
 
Location: Durham, NC
1,615 posts, read 1,966,195 times
Reputation: 2194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
What is Durham's issues and why are the buildings sitting empty?
Durham has a tremendous amount of poverty. It suffered from white flight in its downtown, in addition to the economic issues RTP created. There was less business presence in downtown Durham in the 70s and 80s than any other city in NC, so it has no skyline. However it was a larger city than Raleigh for some of its history and it has a good trove of historic structures left. So revitalization has mostly involved refurbishing those and getting businesses into them, much like Richmond. Durham's made some great strides and many people love it because the grittiness plus the new hipstery things in it give it a lot of character.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2017, 11:54 AM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,150,335 times
Reputation: 14762
Raleigh is like that baby brother who's growing up to be bigger than many of his siblings. He keeps getting knocked around and dismissed by his many brothers but he continues to grow bigger and smarter every day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2017, 11:55 AM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,150,335 times
Reputation: 14762
Quote:
Originally Posted by murksiderock View Post
Most Triangle residents I've seen on CD consider Downtown Durham/Chapel Hill/Carrboro as the urban nodes of the region.
That's an urban myth...pun intended.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2017, 12:19 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX and wherever planes fly
1,907 posts, read 3,227,961 times
Reputation: 2129
Quote:
Originally Posted by rnc2mbfl View Post
Raleigh is like that baby brother who's growing up to be bigger than many of his siblings. He keeps getting knocked around and dismissed by his many brothers but he continues to grow bigger and smarter every day.

Exactly! Very good analogy.. I think the latest metro/city numbers come out tomorrow as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2017, 01:43 PM
 
1,211 posts, read 2,674,892 times
Reputation: 642
Quote:
Originally Posted by murksiderock View Post
The activity definitely isn't contigous the length of Grace, but I didn't claim it was, either. Certainly the main half mile to 10-block stretch of both streets, Grace is not underutilized and is resoundingly more vibrant. I don't think this us really a point to be contested but I'll agree to disagree!

@big aristotle, the issue I have with Raleigh is while it is architecturally, structurally, and physically built the sane as Charlotte, there is no true urban neighborhood in Raleigh. There is nothing in Raleigh on the scale of South End, NoDa, etc. There is comparable neighborhoods to Ayrsley, Northgate, etc. The urbanization of Raleigh is just more suburbanization that is building up the core, but not truly urbanizing it. Kind of like what is going on in Metro Atlanta in Gwinnett County...

I can't agree that Raleigh's urbanization will be more impressive when Richmond's urban rebirth will still continue and will resonate more because it functions as a city more than a suburb, with the framework already in place of a city. Most Triangle residents I've seen on CD consider Downtown Durham/Chapel Hill/Carrboro as the urban nodes of the region. Richmond doesn't have that dynamic, yet there still are urban areas outside the city within the metro (like Petersburg)...

At any rate, I get that many people prefer Raleigh. As mentioned before, I enjoy things about Raleigh. The suburbia--Raleigh's "urbanization"--is not one of them, though...

Youre obviously a Charlotte Troll.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top