Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Celebrating Memorial Day!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-07-2015, 02:41 PM
 
Location: Glendale, CA
1,299 posts, read 2,547,024 times
Reputation: 1400

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MMS02760 View Post
We don't need the Olympics in the Boston area. We are not some place out to sacrifice fiscal responsibility in order to make a mark on the international scene. Boston, by virtue of its history, arts, culture, science, industry, hospitals, and universities already do that.

It should be no surprise that the public in the greater Boston area were not willing to pay exorbitant sums to host a sports event. Massachusetts, though it may be sports crazed, is probably only area in the US with all its major league sports teams playing in privately owned venues that were built with no direct public monies.
L.A. also doesn't use public money to build stadiums -- Staples Center (Lakers, Clippers, Kings) and Dodger Stadium (Dodgers) were privately financed and built. (And both of the 2 proposed NFL stadiums are as well.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-08-2015, 12:45 AM
 
135 posts, read 176,058 times
Reputation: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by TAM88 View Post
It's too bad there isn't a mountain within a 1.5-2 hour drive of Boston with the necessary vertical drop to host the alpine events. Because if there was, Boston would be a great city to host the winter Olympics.

I will root for whatever city the USOC puts up now that the Boston bid is dead. I don't understand how people can be so negative towards the fact that Boston was the USOC's first choice. I think our best chance of hosting the Olympics next will be the 2026 Winter Olympics and Denver should put up a bid.

Hopefully this finally makes people realize that all the New England fanfare is at least two hours away from Boston.

The way people talk about New England's scenery and Boston, make it out like Boston's in the White Mountains.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2015, 12:00 PM
 
Location: Downtown LA
1,192 posts, read 1,649,371 times
Reputation: 868
A first look at LA's newly released 218-page bid book for the 2024 Games:

First Look at L.A.'s 2024 Olympic Bid | Urbanize LA







Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2015, 06:00 PM
 
8,503 posts, read 4,599,308 times
Reputation: 9756
Good luck with the traffic, other hassles, and cost overruns. Very glad it won't be in Boston. We don't need it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2015, 06:44 PM
 
Location: Downtown LA
1,192 posts, read 1,649,371 times
Reputation: 868
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMS02760 View Post
Good luck with the traffic, other hassles, and cost overruns. Very glad it won't be in Boston. We don't need it.
Thanks!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-26-2015, 07:06 PM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,741,110 times
Reputation: 5872
Quote:
Originally Posted by DistrictDirt View Post
A first look at LA's newly released 218-page bid book for the 2024 Games:

First Look at L.A.'s 2024 Olympic Bid | Urbanize LA







Nice. LA is a much better choice imo

Just wish another city that hasn't hosted was bidding
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2015, 09:31 PM
 
Location: northern Vermont - previously NM, WA, & MA
10,774 posts, read 23,921,615 times
Reputation: 14706
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezter View Post
Nice. LA is a much better choice imo

Just wish another city that hasn't hosted was bidding
I just can't think of another US city that can support the infrastructure needed to host the Olympics pulling it off as well as LA could. LA is already morphing into something very different in the 21st century. 1984 is getting more distant in terms of what LA was back then. And lets face it, a whole world of international cultures is already ever present in LA running the whole gamut. This native Bostonian supports Los Angeles 2024.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2015, 09:36 PM
 
Location: Twin Cities (StP)
3,051 posts, read 2,611,100 times
Reputation: 2427
As long as I don't have to pay, I don't care who hosts it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2015, 09:39 PM
 
Location: northern Vermont - previously NM, WA, & MA
10,774 posts, read 23,921,615 times
Reputation: 14706
On another note, I wonder if this will get Boston blacklisted from ever hosting the Olympics, the same way Denver was when they turned down hosting the 76 Winter Olympics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-27-2015, 11:17 PM
 
Location: Denver/Atlanta
6,083 posts, read 10,741,110 times
Reputation: 5872
Quote:
Originally Posted by Desert_SW_77 View Post
I just can't think of another US city that can support the infrastructure needed to host the Olympics pulling it off as well as LA could. LA is already morphing into something very different in the 21st century. 1984 is getting more distant in terms of what LA was back then. And lets face it, a whole world of international cultures is already ever present in LA running the whole gamut. This native Bostonian supports Los Angeles 2024.
Yeah, I still think LA is a great choice and has everything needed compared to most cities.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Desert_SW_77 View Post
On another note, I wonder if this will get Boston blacklisted from ever hosting the Olympics, the same way Denver was when they turned down hosting the 76 Winter Olympics.
I doubt it. The OC probably won't think of Denver because they won the games and bailed, leaving them to scramble for a new host quickly. Boston didn't stay in the running long enough to win so it wasn't really a slap in the face.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:15 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top