Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts > Boston
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-01-2014, 09:35 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts
264 posts, read 389,169 times
Reputation: 283

Advertisements

Watch 2024 Boston Olympic Bid Promotional Video

There is the link for the promotional video for Boston to host the 2024 Olympic Summer Games. What are your thoughts on it? I know people I've talked to personally think it's a stretch and that our infrastructure couldn't handle it. On the other hand, some people think it would bring much-needed economic and cultural boosts to our great city. Remember, Boston is considered to be an Alpha- Global city on the same wavelength as Buenos Aires, San Francisco, Munich, Prague, Atlanta, Melbourne, Barcelona etc. So could we pull it off?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-02-2014, 02:57 AM
 
5,792 posts, read 5,109,605 times
Reputation: 8008
No, sorry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2014, 06:51 AM
 
Location: a bar
2,726 posts, read 6,115,039 times
Reputation: 2982
Bring it!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2014, 07:51 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
264 posts, read 389,169 times
Reputation: 283
Quote:
Originally Posted by pennyone View Post
No, sorry.
Wanna elaborate why not?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2014, 03:07 PM
 
Location: Westwood, MA
5,037 posts, read 6,926,821 times
Reputation: 5961
Will we win the US bid? Probably not. Even if we did win the US bid would we actually be awarded the Olympics? Probably not. If both of those things happened could we successfully host the Olympics? Sure. Of course we could.

Should we? No. Our money is better spent on something else or returned to taxpayers. And the benefits are extremely dubious. How exactly will hosting a two-week sporting contest bring long-lasting economic and cultural boosts to our area? There may be a slight bump in name recognition, but is that really important?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2014, 05:44 PM
 
4,857 posts, read 7,611,888 times
Reputation: 6394
It's been proven that the Olympics don't do much for the local economy, and Boston already has a good reputation and is well known. Boston's one of those cities that everyone is fond of, even for those who have never been there.

Otoh, I don't live in Boston, soooo...What do I know?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2014, 06:42 PM
 
Location: 42°22'55.2"N 71°24'46.8"W
4,848 posts, read 11,815,153 times
Reputation: 2962
If we won the bid that would be awesome. It will force us to improve our infrastructure. Look at what it did to Atlanta in 1996. The city was forced to build several new train stations and a new spur which added miles of new tracks. The Olympic village used to be a wasteland of gang activity and homeless people. Now it's a very trendy and expensive place to live in the city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2014, 12:37 PM
 
Location: Providence, RI
12,871 posts, read 22,035,348 times
Reputation: 14134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flashpoint922 View Post
Watch 2024 Boston Olympic Bid Promotional Video

There is the link for the promotional video for Boston to host the 2024 Olympic Summer Games. What are your thoughts on it? I know people I've talked to personally think it's a stretch and that our infrastructure couldn't handle it. On the other hand, some people think it would bring much-needed economic and cultural boosts to our great city. Remember, Boston is considered to be an Alpha- Global city on the same wavelength as Buenos Aires, San Francisco, Munich, Prague, Atlanta, Melbourne, Barcelona etc. So could we pull it off?
Why on earth would they expect our infrastructure to remain "as-is" if we were awarded the Olympics? Just about every city that wins the Olympics makes major infrastructure improvements to accommodate the event. Moreover, places like Atlanta and Salt Lake City don't have nearly the existing infrastructure that Boston does and they've both hosted Olympics. Of the other cities in the U.S. nominated, only D.C. has better multimodal transit infrastructure already in place. Boston could pull it off with its existing infrastructure, but there would definitely be significant improvements if Boston won and you can bet the Olympic Committee is very well aware of that.

My favorite part of the potential Olympic bid is that I think it would force the region to make some much needed infrastructure improvements. For example:
1) Red/Blue Line connection at Charles/MGH (Run the Blue under Cambrdige from Bowdoin)
2) The Green Line Extension (will be done anyway, apparently) to Medford
3) updated trains on Red/Blue/Green/Orange
4) Urban Ring transit (at minimum, a Bus Rapid Transit route ringing the city center... preferably light or heavy rail)
5) upgrade the Silver Line from South Station through the Seaport to light rail (the tunnels were designed for this anyway) as the Seaport is the fastest growing neighborhood and is without major transit links
6) South Station expansion and electrification of all commuter rail lines (this will improve speeds and headways)
7) Commuter Rail Line upgrades (minimize at-grade road crossings to improve speed and safety, double tracking in places, etc.)
8) SOME direct linke between North/South Stations... either a surface trolley/tram along the RK Greenway, or go all out and complete a North/South Rail Link.

Completing even a handful of those upgrades would significantly improve our transportation infrastructure and make the city more appealing as an Olympic host. They'd also improve our transportation situation for a long time to come as well. Infrastructure improvements are one of the biggest "pluses" for submitting a bid.

That being said, the economic "benefits" are often minimal and don't match the enormous costs. Tourism boosts, especially for established cities like Boston are not necessarily long-lasting or as big as anticipated. Places like Sydney and Athens went all out and lost big. It's not sustainable to spend billions on massive complexes only to have them rot after two weeks of use. Most cities are catching on after the disasters that are Rio, Sochi and Athens.

Boston needs to follow London's lead and incorporate existing infrastructure (our stadiums and dorms could save us a fortune in creating new venues and residences for the Olympics) and only build new venues that can easily be converted and used for every day purposes once the Olympics are over (i.e. Olympic village that converts to market rate apartments, a stadium that can be partially deconstructed and used for our local MLS team or as an upgraded college facility).

If the IOC wants everything shiny and new, Boston should tell them to shove it. If they're willing to play ball (as the were with London) and allow the city to use some of the existing venues and build only what is currently unavailable, then Boston could be a good candidate.

Those who are saying that it's "unlikely" that Boston will get the nod shouldn't be so certain. Boston is seen by the USOC as one of the favorites (along with DC and San Francisco). DC's mid-summer heat and San Francisco's lack of buildable space as well as worse transit infrastructure put both of those cities at a disadvantage. The IOC and the USIOC are very impressed with how Boston handled the Marathon Bombings and a city's ability to handle terrorist threats and attacks is a major, major factor in the decision. I would not be in the least bit surprised to see Boston selected as the U.S. candidate for the Olympics.

Personally, I'm lukewarm on the idea. I really like the thought of major transit infrastructure upgrades. I would support it ONLY if there's a way to incorporate existing venues (Fenway, TD Garden, Harvard Stadium, etc., college dorms, etc.) instead of spending billions to build everything new.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2014, 12:39 PM
 
18 posts, read 25,441 times
Reputation: 24
This is a great idea do it. Trust me, if they didn't know Boston had a great shot, they wouldn't have come this far. I know some people are well connected, and all the insiders think Boston has a great shot for the United States bid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2014, 06:20 PM
 
240 posts, read 239,898 times
Reputation: 348
Makes good sense Boston is the city of Champions , it would perfect and long overdue
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts > Boston
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:15 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top