Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which city sees the most foot traffic?
Los Angeles 6 4.03%
Chicago 35 23.49%
Houston 0 0%
Philadelphia 13 8.72%
Miami 1 0.67%
San Francisco 59 39.60%
San Diego 0 0%
Washington D.C. 8 5.37%
Atlanta 4 2.68%
New Orleans 3 2.01%
Boston 10 6.71%
Seattle 6 4.03%
Orlando 0 0%
Dallas 2 1.34%
Other 2 1.34%
Voters: 149. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-25-2015, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Maryland
4,675 posts, read 7,400,914 times
Reputation: 5363

Advertisements

Chicago and SF seem like the logical top contenders, followed by DC, Boston, and Philly, I'd imagine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-25-2015, 12:03 PM
 
Location: sumter
12,968 posts, read 9,650,170 times
Reputation: 10432
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
Most peak foot traffic in the city core? Obviously putting NYC completely aside, it has to be Chicago or SF.

If I HAD to pick one? I think Michigan Ave. in Chicago probably has the highest peak pedestrian volume in the U.S. outside of the NYC area. SF might have a bit more consistent traffic over a sizable area, though.
I agree with this one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2015, 12:04 PM
 
Location: Crown Heights
251 posts, read 283,112 times
Reputation: 177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dawn.Davenport View Post
DC could be a contender too. It has a lot of walkable neighborhoods, great public transportation, and the traffic/parking is horrible.
DC ain't bad, and certainly punches above it's weight, but it's distinctly below Chicago and SF. Could be considered on par with Philly and Boston though perhaps
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2015, 12:12 PM
 
Location: sumter
12,968 posts, read 9,650,170 times
Reputation: 10432
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
There are numerous parts of Chicago with a lot of foot traffic outside of Michigan Avenue. The 6 corner area in Wicker Park for example as well as parts of the Gold Coast (Division Street, Rush, etc) both have a lot. State Street in both the Loop and River North too. Then there are areas in Boystown, Lakeview, and Lincoln Park which can have enough as well as Chinatown and Devon Street (little India), Wells Street in Old Town, Lincoln Avenue in Lincoln Square, Clark Street in Andersonville, etc.
Also Wacker Drive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2015, 12:19 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,078 posts, read 15,851,756 times
Reputation: 4049
Here's how I'd rank them by MSA:


San Francisco
Philadelphia
Chicago
Boston
Washington D.C.
Los Angeles
Seattle
Miami
New Orleans
Atlanta
San Diego
Dallas
Houston
Orlando

But honestly I think the first six and the last four are pretty even.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2015, 12:19 PM
 
Location: Upper West Side, Manhattan, NYC
15,323 posts, read 23,913,587 times
Reputation: 7419
Quote:
Originally Posted by ipaper View Post
Also Wacker Drive.
Pretty much 75% of the Loop Monday thru Friday 8:30am - 5pm or 5:30pm as well - the daytime population in just over 1 sq mile swells to around 750K people during that time. of course, many office works, but when it's lunchtime, or morning/evening rush there's a lot of people out. Then it goes dead after that except for Lakeshore East and around MIllennium/Grant Parks because not a lot of people actually live there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2015, 12:21 PM
 
Location: Crown Heights
251 posts, read 283,112 times
Reputation: 177
I know we're talking about cities as a whole, but I found daily pedestrian volume counts for the busiest streets in these various non-New York cities:

Market Street, San Francisco: 50,000
Michigan Avenue, Chicago: 40,000
Walnut Street, Philadelphia: 32,000
Boylston Street, Boston: 28,000
Broadway, Los Angeles: 15,000

could't find data for 7th street in DC but I'd imagine it'd be in the range of Walnut and Boylston
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2015, 12:26 PM
 
Location: Upper West Side, Manhattan, NYC
15,323 posts, read 23,913,587 times
Reputation: 7419
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMBX View Post
I know we're talking about cities as a whole, but I found daily pedestrian volume counts for the busiest streets in these various non-New York cities:

Market Street, San Francisco: 50,000
Michigan Avenue, Chicago: 40,000
Walnut Street, Philadelphia: 32,000
Boylston Street, Boston: 28,000
Broadway, Los Angeles: 15,000

could't find data for 7th street in DC but I'd imagine it'd be in the range of Walnut and Boylston
^ What is their source and how did they test this? I think that the number of visitors on some streets can vary a lot. I guarantee you that Michigan Avenue gets more than 40K people per day - that number is low.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2015, 12:26 PM
 
Location: Mishawaka, Indiana
7,010 posts, read 11,971,589 times
Reputation: 5813
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMBX View Post
I know we're talking about cities as a whole, but I found daily pedestrian volume counts for the busiest streets in these various non-New York cities:

Market Street, San Francisco: 50,000
Michigan Avenue, Chicago: 40,000
Walnut Street, Philadelphia: 32,000
Boylston Street, Boston: 28,000
Broadway, Los Angeles: 15,000

could't find data for 7th street in DC but I'd imagine it'd be in the range of Walnut and Boylston
Link to the data? Unless it's a competing site, I'm curious where these stats are, fascinating stuff about market Street, didn't know it was so busy!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2015, 12:26 PM
 
1,353 posts, read 1,643,243 times
Reputation: 817
^^^That's surprising. Market generally doesn't feel *quite* as packed as Michigan, though it could be because the Market St sidewalks are wider? I've seen the 50K figure for Market, but I feel like I've seen higher for Michigan. Generally I observe that Michigan and Market are the clear busiest streets outside of those found in Manhattan, or perhaps Fulton in downtown Brooklyn, which is also packed. In terms of rush hour foot traffic, I'd put the Loop a little ahead of the financial district in SF, but both ahead of the rest. In terms of cohesive, "busy" foot traffic outside of these main streets and downtown rush hours, I'd say SF is a clear #2 behind NYC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top