Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Worst City For Traffic
Dallas, TX 2 1.23%
New York, NY 17 10.43%
Los Angeles, CA 88 53.99%
Denver, CO 1 0.61%
Kansas City, MO/KS 0 0%
San Francisco, CA 21 12.88%
Miami, FL 1 0.61%
Oklahoma City, OK 0 0%
Houston, TX 3 1.84%
Phoenix, AZ 0 0%
Chicago, IL 7 4.29%
Minneapolis, MN 0 0%
Seattle, WA 7 4.29%
Detroit, MI 2 1.23%
Indianapolis, IN 0 0%
New Orleans, LA 0 0%
Atlanta, GA 13 7.98%
St. Louis, MO 0 0%
Milwaukee, WI 0 0%
Las Vegas, NV 1 0.61%
Voters: 163. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-29-2015, 09:13 AM
 
99 posts, read 117,528 times
Reputation: 178

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nafster View Post
Are those the only three cities you've ever been to?

Los Angeles is the worst for sure, but I can say without a doubt that DC, Miami, and New York are worse than Chicago and Atlanta.
NY is bad too but it has good public transportation so it mitigates some of the problems.. I think the traffic in Chicago and Atlanta is a bit worse compared to DC and Miami..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-29-2015, 10:07 AM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,078 posts, read 15,907,926 times
Reputation: 4054
Boston can have bad traffic but it's nowhere near the level of Southern CA, the Bay Area, DC, or NYC.

It certainly helps that their commuter rail is so well used by suburbanites.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2015, 03:42 PM
 
Location: Calera, AL
1,485 posts, read 2,266,476 times
Reputation: 2423
While I'm not surprised it's not mentioned here, Birmingham has some shockingly bad traffic for a city of its size. Everyone, and I mean EVERYONE, is either on I-65 or US-280 every workday. People from as far as 75 miles away drive to Birmingham to work every M-F and there's just not many alternate routes you can take, effectively clogging every main artery in the city. There are no plans to build a light-rail system or even an extra bypass spur to alleviate the traffic, and the southernmost portion of I-65 won't be widened for at least 4 or 5 more years (though it badly needs it now). Worst of all, most of the hillbillies that live here have absolutely no clue on how to properly operate a motorized vehicle. Part of me wishes that Birmingham would just go back to horse and buggy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2015, 04:29 PM
 
63 posts, read 96,160 times
Reputation: 59
Even if Boston's traffic is not as bad as that in Southern California, its still really BAD and needs to be on this list.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2015, 07:53 PM
 
144 posts, read 272,177 times
Reputation: 192
It takes a greater degree of personal experience to be able to add anything meaningful to this type of discussion. As a lifelong Chicagoan, I would have to think Chicagoland rush hours are among the five worst nationally. It takes my dad 1.5-2 hrs one way to make a 30 mile commute (drive) from Chicago's southwest suburbs (one of the lighter arteries feeding Chicago's loop) to the loop each day (leaving before and after peak rush hours). Even after factoring in Downtown Chicago's 57% transit commuter mode share, there are still 215,000 car commuters driving to the Loop each day, which ranks second nationally.
Moderator cut: link removed, linking to competitor sites is not allowed

Los Angeles is definitely the worst city and metro for commuting that I've ever witnessed. The lack of viable public transportation options in the region is a joke. New York is obviously going to be one of the worst. Aside from the occasional short visit, I can't say I can effectively comment on too many other cities.

Last edited by Yac; 07-01-2015 at 07:18 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2015, 10:45 AM
 
Location: Milwaukee
3,453 posts, read 4,549,626 times
Reputation: 2987
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taynxtlvl View Post
1. Los Angeles by far. Where in the other cities in generally slacks off aside from peak hours and is tolerable, LA can be bonkers 24/7.

I nominate these as the runners up:

2.Chicago
3.New York
4. Houston
5. Atlanta

6. The rest.
I'm only including cities I've driven in. I'd go Chicago, then:

2. LA
3. NYC
4. DC
5. Boston/Philly?

First 3 are close, bad for different reasons. Have never driven in ATL. While I wouldn't put Houston that high, it is definitely a hassle getting anywhere in that city. Seems like everything is so spread out and everything takes forever and you just want to $^&*@ scream. Miami is bubbling under. Toronto would rank fairly high here if we were to include Canada.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2015, 12:09 PM
 
Location: O4W
3,744 posts, read 4,799,391 times
Reputation: 2076
LA
NYC (Those expressways in Brooklyn and Queens)
DC
Boston
Chicago

Last edited by afdinatl; 06-30-2015 at 12:31 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2015, 12:28 PM
 
Location: Milwaukee
3,453 posts, read 4,549,626 times
Reputation: 2987
Seattle over Chicago? Please explain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2015, 12:31 PM
 
Location: O4W
3,744 posts, read 4,799,391 times
Reputation: 2076
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheese plate View Post
Seattle over Chicago? Please explain.
My bad
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2015, 02:59 PM
 
Location: Houston/Austin, TX
10,038 posts, read 6,741,312 times
Reputation: 6516
LA by far. runner ups: Chicago, Houston and NYC
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top