Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-11-2018, 10:14 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
9,818 posts, read 7,931,600 times
Reputation: 9991

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by R1070 View Post
For the record... DFW is upgrading and expanding it's roads and it's rails. The public and government opinion of rail and bus transit in this area is definitely more open and progressive than in Georgia and the Metro ATL burbs.
Daily rail ridership says otherwise, and Atlanta recently voted for an additional 1/2 cent MARTA tax to build out the Crosstown & BeltLine Streetcar network.

Dallas - DART Light Rail, Denton County A-Train & TRE Commuter Rail - 104,300 daily

Atlanta - Atlanta Streetcar & MARTA Heavy Rail - 223,700 daily

http://www.apta.com/resources/statis...rship-APTA.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-12-2018, 07:10 AM
 
37,881 posts, read 41,956,856 times
Reputation: 27279
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays25 View Post
Or you can invest more in transit. Atlanta's commute shares should double in the next couple decades if you do it right, particularly as infill takes hold.
Investing in both roads and rail isn't mutually exclusive. As far as roads go, at this point Atlanta can only do but so much. There are just too many property owners who will be affected if new secondary roads are proposed in the areas that need them most. This should have been done years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2018, 09:24 AM
 
2,134 posts, read 2,117,737 times
Reputation: 2585
Quote:
Originally Posted by R1070 View Post
For the record... DFW is upgrading and expanding it's roads and it's rails. The public and government opinion of rail and bus transit in this area is definitely more open and progressive than in Georgia and the Metro ATL burbs.
It should only expand rail, not highways. It's counterproductive to do both. The goal is to reduce car dependency.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2018, 09:50 AM
 
Location: In the heights
37,148 posts, read 39,404,784 times
Reputation: 21232
I remember reading a while back that Dallas has a pretty aggressive expansion plan for its light rail system. Is that still happening? What are some of the approved / under construction lines as of April 2018?

Atlanta right now has a sizable heavy rail mass transit system that they can easily grow into if development was guided accordingly. It's really two heavy rail lines with branches at each end, but that's still a good lot to work with compared to most US cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2018, 09:59 AM
 
37,881 posts, read 41,956,856 times
Reputation: 27279
Quote:
Originally Posted by DTXman34 View Post
It should only expand rail, not highways. It's counterproductive to do both. The goal is to reduce car dependency.
You're not going to reduce car dependency as long as it's cheap and easy to drive and park.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2018, 12:04 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX and wherever planes fly
1,907 posts, read 3,229,909 times
Reputation: 2129
Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
I remember reading a while back that Dallas has a pretty aggressive expansion plan for its light rail system. Is that still happening? What are some of the approved / under construction lines as of April 2018?

Atlanta right now has a sizable heavy rail mass transit system that they can easily grow into if development was guided accordingly. It's really two heavy rail lines with branches at each end, but that's still a good lot to work with compared to most US cities.
Yes. two extensions opened in 2016.. (The blue line) Now construction of the (Purple line) is underway and will connect west Plano where the new toyota headquarters is along with a multitude of other companies to DFW international through the towns of Carrollton and Lewisville. I think opening is 2022.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2018, 01:51 PM
 
2,134 posts, read 2,117,737 times
Reputation: 2585
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post
You're not going to reduce car dependency as long as it's cheap and easy to drive and park.
Yes you can by voting in the right people. If you can't impact the metro, you can certainly impact the city. And any Dallas city council member that does not vote for the removal of I-345, will be voted out. I don't care if they tunnel it or turn it into an urban blvd. But it can no longer remain in its current state. I'm confident though that it won't remain as is. Whether or not it will be buried or turned into a blvd is up in the air at this point. Also, the city is instrumental in determining our public transit policies. We now have more power on the DART board than the suburbs, so we can easily redirect more towards the benefit of the city over the suburbs. #Winning
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2018, 03:24 PM
 
37,881 posts, read 41,956,856 times
Reputation: 27279
Quote:
Originally Posted by DTXman34 View Post
Yes you can by voting in the right people. If you can't impact the metro, you can certainly impact the city. And any Dallas city council member that does not vote for the removal of I-345, will be voted out. I don't care if they tunnel it or turn it into an urban blvd. But it can no longer remain in its current state. I'm confident though that it won't remain as is. Whether or not it will be buried or turned into a blvd is up in the air at this point. Also, the city is instrumental in determining our public transit policies. We now have more power on the DART board than the suburbs, so we can easily redirect more towards the benefit of the city over the suburbs. #Winning
It has nothing to do with "voting in the right people," but everything to do with implementing the right policies. It has been proven that the convenience of driving and especially parking is what prevents reduction in car dependence.
As shown by many studies, minimum parking requirements lead to excess parking supply, make driving cheap and convenient, and thus encourage a shift toward more car use. Implementation of maximum parking allowances is an important recent policy development to discourage car use.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full...7.2016.1177799

Researchers gathered data on parking rates and fines in 107 different public jurisdictions and cross-referenced it with local transit ridership. They found that in large cities — defined as cities with a population density of 6,200 people per square mile or higher — there was a strong relationship. Among these cities, places with high parking costs — defined through a combination of rates, fines, and fees — were associated with a 2.3-fold increase in public transit passenger miles per person, when adjusted for local economic factors like poverty rates and gas prices.

https://usa.streetsblog.org/2014/04/...ts-are-higher/
So you can already see the challenge of increasing transit usage in low-density sprawling metropolitan areas where land is plentiful and relatively cheap. Adding more rail lines or removing a freeway mean nothing if it's still convenient to drive and park; if that's the case, most people will choose to drive. Point blank, period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2018, 03:26 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,148 posts, read 39,404,784 times
Reputation: 21232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mutiny77 View Post
It has nothing to do with "voting in the right people," but everything to do with implementing the right policies. It has been proven that the convenience of driving and especially parking is what prevents reduction in car dependence.
As shown by many studies, minimum parking requirements lead to excess parking supply, make driving cheap and convenient, and thus encourage a shift toward more car use. Implementation of maximum parking allowances is an important recent policy development to discourage car use.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full...7.2016.1177799

Researchers gathered data on parking rates and fines in 107 different public jurisdictions and cross-referenced it with local transit ridership. They found that in large cities — defined as cities with a population density of 6,200 people per square mile or higher — there was a strong relationship. Among these cities, places with high parking costs — defined through a combination of rates, fines, and fees — were associated with a 2.3-fold increase in public transit passenger miles per person, when adjusted for local economic factors like poverty rates and gas prices.

https://usa.streetsblog.org/2014/04/...ts-are-higher/
So you can already see the challenge of increasing transit usage in low-density sprawling metropolitan areas where land is plentiful and relatively cheap. Adding more rail lines means nothing if it's convenient to drive and park; if that's the case, most people will choose to drive. Point blank, period.
You guys seem like you're saying roughly equivalent things, but yet you sound like you're arguing. It's nice!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2018, 03:29 PM
 
37,881 posts, read 41,956,856 times
Reputation: 27279
Quote:
Originally Posted by OyCrumbler View Post
You guys seem like you're saying roughly equivalent things, but yet you sound like you're arguing. It's nice!
Actually we're not. He hasn't touched land use policies or parking regulations and that's the linchpin in terms of reducing car dependence. Adding more lines of light rail and eliminating a freeway are nice, but if driving is still convenient, cheap, and easy, that is the mode of transportation that most will use.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top