Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Best choice for the second expansion team in the NBA, if the NBA chooses to expand?
Mexico City 13 4.30%
Montreal 16 5.30%
San Diego 23 7.62%
Vancouver 14 4.64%
Tampa 6 1.99%
Baltimore 15 4.97%
Pittsburgh 20 6.62%
Saint Louis 42 13.91%
Las Vegas 53 17.55%
Austin 23 7.62%
Kansas City 36 11.92%
Louisville 15 4.97%
Raleigh 4 1.32%
Richmond 4 1.32%
Virginia Beach/Norfolk 13 4.30%
Omaha 5 1.66%
Voters: 302. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-19-2016, 12:37 PM
 
14,020 posts, read 15,011,523 times
Reputation: 10466

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
My point was is that the sports only have small periods of seasonal overlap, so just because a place has a MLB and NFL team doesn't mean it couldn't also support an NBA or NHL team
There is a limited amount of disposable income in a city though, I guarantee Blues and Cardinals ticket prices will go up, if they haven't already responded to the lack of people spending money on the Rams.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-19-2016, 12:38 PM
 
Location: The State Of California
10,400 posts, read 15,579,392 times
Reputation: 4283
Default True.................

Originally Posted by Howest2008
This is a interesting thread because it allows for all types of ( guessamations ) but action speak's louder than words. Which cities is going to pony up and build ( A NBA Caliber Arena ) for this so called rumored expansion NBA Team , and not become over saturated?


1.Saint Louis MO......MLB.......NHL....could handle the NBA.....
2. Kansas City MO ........NFL.....MLB...MLS....is over saturated.
3. Lost Wages Nut badder.....NHL....NFL.....is over saturated.
4. Pittsburgh PA.....NFL....MLB.....NHL...is over saturated.
5. Baltimore MD......NFL.....could handle the NBA & NHL.
6.Louisville KY......No Billion Dollar Man To Build The Arena.
7. Tidewater/Hampton Roads....Trying can't build an NBA Caliber Arena.
8.Vancouver Canada.....Had NBA Team that no one cared about.
9. Nashville TN....NFL.....NHL...over saturated.
10. Columbus OH.....NHL....could support a NBA team.
11. Tulsa OK....Tulsa Oklahoma would not support anything that wasn't a Museum ...

#2 Kansas City has been trying to get an NBA/NHL team since the Sprint Center was built, as
a matter of fact Kansas City/Oklahoma City/Tulsa Oklahoma all attempted to lure Pittsburgh
NHL Team to town before Pittsburgh broke down and built them a brand new Arena.


#11 Tulsa Oklahoma had a WNBA Team The Tulsa Shocks...couldn't keep them....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsa_Shock
Tulsa Talons....couldn't keep them.....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Antonio_Talons
Tulsa Oklahoma World Class Arena Will not have major league teams for the next 20 yrs.
Home - BOK Center



Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
Generally being a strong MLS market means the place has entertainment dollars in excess. Hence Portland, KC, and the NFL-less Los Angeles were strong soccer markets. So I think an NBA team would overwhelm the MLS team because the NBA is a better product than the MLS.

Kansas City Missouri has entertainment dollars galore ......MLB World Championship Caliber
Team.....NFL.....Playoff Team....MLS Playoff Team.


That's all that KC can handle at this time....


And add to that the SPRINT CENTER is a WORLD CLASS VENUE top 5 in the WORLD.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2016, 12:46 PM
 
14,020 posts, read 15,011,523 times
Reputation: 10466
One more thing people have to consider is team owners vote on expansion.
I doubt that the Lakers or the Clippers want another team in SoCal, or the 76ers or Wizards want a team in Baltimore.
These new teams would eat into their territory, thus they'd start out with enemies.
That is why Vancouver, KC, or Louisville may have an advantage, they are very far from any NBA team so no other owner would particularly care if someone took that market.
This sort of territorial infighting is a reason Hartford (Bruins, Rangers, Isles, Devils) and QC (Montreal, Toronto, Ottawa) struggle to get NHL teams.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2016, 07:09 PM
 
1,449 posts, read 2,187,112 times
Reputation: 1494
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
One more thing people have to consider is team owners vote on expansion.
I doubt that the Lakers or the Clippers want another team in SoCal, or the 76ers or Wizards want a team in Baltimore.
These new teams would eat into their territory, thus they'd start out with enemies.
That is why Vancouver, KC, or Louisville may have an advantage, they are very far from any NBA team so no other owner would particularly care if someone took that market.
This sort of territorial infighting is a reason Hartford (Bruins, Rangers, Isles, Devils) and QC (Montreal, Toronto, Ottawa) struggle to get NHL teams.
?? That is nowhere near being the same market.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2016, 07:27 PM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,596,838 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
One more thing people have to consider is team owners vote on expansion.
I doubt that the Lakers or the Clippers want another team in SoCal, or the 76ers or Wizards want a team in Baltimore.
These new teams would eat into their territory, thus they'd start out with enemies.
That is why Vancouver, KC, or Louisville may have an advantage, they are very far from any NBA team so no other owner would particularly care if someone took that market.
This sort of territorial infighting is a reason Hartford (Bruins, Rangers, Isles, Devils) and QC (Montreal, Toronto, Ottawa) struggle to get NHL teams.
Hartford and Quebec City had teams, they just moved to Raleigh and Denver respectively
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2016, 09:06 PM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,738,907 times
Reputation: 17398
One thing to note is that the NBA likes to locate teams in emerging major metropolitan areas where there's less competition for sports dollars. This is why Orlando, Memphis, Oklahoma City, San Antonio, Salt Lake City (Utah), Sacramento and Portland have NBA teams, because those cities have no other major professional sports franchises. The NBA also has teams in cities like Charlotte, Indianapolis (Indiana), Milwaukee and New Orleans, which only have one other major professional sports franchise. That's 11 out of 30 NBA teams in cities with little or no competition for sports dollars.

Otherwise, the NBA is found mostly in extra-large metropolitan areas. New York and Los Angeles each have two NBA teams, and Boston, Philadelphia, Washington DC, Atlanta, Miami, Toronto, Detroit, Chicago, Minneapolis (Minnesota), Houston, Dallas, Phoenix and the San Francisco Bay Area (Golden State) each have a team, so now 28 out of 30 NBA teams are accounted for in either emerging or extra-large markets. The only metropolitan areas with less than 3,000,000 people and more than one other major professional sports league aside from the NBA are Denver and Cleveland.

Knowing all this, here's how I'd assess the options above:

Mexico City and Montreal would have currency issues, and Mexico City would also be a culture shock. Vancouver recently lost the Grizzlies to Memphis, and Kansas City lost the Kings to Sacramento. Tampa, Baltimore, Austin and Raleigh are indirectly part of the Orlando, Washington, San Antonio and Charlotte markets, respectively. Pittsburgh is a saturated market with all three other major professional sports leagues present already. Omaha might still be too small to support a major professional sports franchise.

This leaves San Diego, St. Louis, Louisville, Richmond and Virginia Beach/Norfolk as options. Of those, San Diego, St. Louis and Las Vegas strike me as the most realistic. A team in Louisville would possibly infringe on the Indiana Pacers, and a team in Richmond would possibly infringe on the Washington Wizards. A team in the Hampton Roads region probably wouldn't infringe on the Wizards, but it would preclude a team in Richmond.

Not counting the Inland Empire of California, which is indirectly part of the Los Angeles market, San Diego is the second-largest metropolitan area in the U.S. without an NBA team (Seattle), and might soon lose the Chargers to Los Angeles, leaving the Padres as the only competition for sports dollars in a rather large metropolitan area. St. Louis has already lost the Rams to Los Angeles, and is a slightly larger market than Pittsburgh, which has proven capable of supporting three major professional sports teams, so the void created by the Rams' departure could be filled easily by an NBA team. Las Vegas is another viable option as well, though, ironically, the NHL has beaten the NBA to the market.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2016, 09:14 PM
 
Location: Louisiana to Houston to Denver to NOVA
16,508 posts, read 26,301,334 times
Reputation: 13293
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
One more thing people have to consider is team owners vote on expansion.
I doubt that the Lakers or the Clippers want another team in SoCal, or the 76ers or Wizards want a team in Baltimore.
These new teams would eat into their territory, thus they'd start out with enemies.
That is why Vancouver, KC, or Louisville may have an advantage, they are very far from any NBA team so no other owner would particularly care if someone took that market.
This sort of territorial infighting is a reason Hartford (Bruins, Rangers, Isles, Devils) and QC (Montreal, Toronto, Ottawa) struggle to get NHL teams.
Louisville is two hours away from Indy (NFL and NBA), Nashville, (NHL and NFL), and Cincy (NFL and MLB). Louisville is surrounded by professional teams on all sides.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2016, 09:16 PM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,738,907 times
Reputation: 17398
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirebirdCamaro1220 View Post
To people who think a market can be oversaturated, Greater NYC has THREE NHL teams (Rangers, Islanders and Devils), so oversaturated doesn't exist
New York has more than 20,000,000 people to draw from, and the Islanders and Devils still don't pack the house consistently.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2016, 10:14 PM
JJG
 
Location: Fort Worth
13,612 posts, read 22,898,942 times
Reputation: 7643
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craziaskowboi View Post
One thing to note is that the NBA likes to locate teams in emerging major metropolitan areas where there's less competition for sports dollars. This is why Orlando, Memphis, Oklahoma City, San Antonio, Salt Lake City (Utah), Sacramento and Portland have NBA teams, because those cities have no other major professional sports franchises. The NBA also has teams in cities like Charlotte, Indianapolis (Indiana), Milwaukee and New Orleans, which only have one other major professional sports franchise.
Well, 3 of those cities (will be 5 in the not-too-distant future) have Major League Soccer, which NOW counts as a major league.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-19-2016, 11:44 PM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,596,838 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craziaskowboi View Post
One thing to note is that the NBA likes to locate teams in emerging major metropolitan areas where there's less competition for sports dollars. This is why Orlando, Memphis, Oklahoma City, San Antonio, Salt Lake City (Utah), Sacramento and Portland have NBA teams, because those cities have no other major professional sports franchises. The NBA also has teams in cities like Charlotte, Indianapolis (Indiana), Milwaukee and New Orleans, which only have one other major professional sports franchise. That's 11 out of 30 NBA teams in cities with little or no competition for sports dollars.

Otherwise, the NBA is found mostly in extra-large metropolitan areas. New York and Los Angeles each have two NBA teams, and Boston, Philadelphia, Washington DC, Atlanta, Miami, Toronto, Detroit, Chicago, Minneapolis (Minnesota), Houston, Dallas, Phoenix and the San Francisco Bay Area (Golden State) each have a team, so now 28 out of 30 NBA teams are accounted for in either emerging or extra-large markets. The only metropolitan areas with less than 3,000,000 people and more than one other major professional sports league aside from the NBA are Denver and Cleveland.

Knowing all this, here's how I'd assess the options above:

Mexico City and Montreal would have currency issues, and Mexico City would also be a culture shock. Vancouver recently lost the Grizzlies to Memphis, and Kansas City lost the Kings to Sacramento. Tampa, Baltimore, Austin and Raleigh are indirectly part of the Orlando, Washington, San Antonio and Charlotte markets, respectively. Pittsburgh is a saturated market with all three other major professional sports leagues present already. Omaha might still be too small to support a major professional sports franchise.

This leaves San Diego, St. Louis, Louisville, Richmond and Virginia Beach/Norfolk as options. Of those, San Diego, St. Louis and Las Vegas strike me as the most realistic. A team in Louisville would possibly infringe on the Indiana Pacers, and a team in Richmond would possibly infringe on the Washington Wizards. A team in the Hampton Roads region probably wouldn't infringe on the Wizards, but it would preclude a team in Richmond.

Not counting the Inland Empire of California, which is indirectly part of the Los Angeles market, San Diego is the second-largest metropolitan area in the U.S. without an NBA team (Seattle), and might soon lose the Chargers to Los Angeles, leaving the Padres as the only competition for sports dollars in a rather large metropolitan area. St. Louis has already lost the Rams to Los Angeles, and is a slightly larger market than Pittsburgh, which has proven capable of supporting three major professional sports teams, so the void created by the Rams' departure could be filled easily by an NBA team. Las Vegas is another viable option as well, though, ironically, the NHL has beaten the NBA to the market.
San Antonio and Indianapolis were two of the 4 ABA teams that got to go to the NBA after the buyout in 76. (The other two were Denver and New Jersey), don't know if the Spurs or the Pacers would have existed otherwise
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top