Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-10-2017, 12:47 PM
_OT
 
Location: Miami
2,183 posts, read 2,416,977 times
Reputation: 2053

Advertisements

I find the Central Florida/Gulf Coast Palm Diversity more appealing that California Palms.

Sabal Palms are underrated, they perfectly fit the mold of the Lush/Sub-Tropical aesthetic of the Gulf Coast/Deep South, you won't see these type of Palms anywhere in the US. You can find Washingtonias in Florida, but it'd be rare to find a Sabal Palm in Cali...

https://www.google.com/maps/@29.8920...8i6656!6m1!1e1
https://www.google.com/maps/@27.9602...8i6656!6m1!1e1
https://www.google.com/maps/@27.7476...8i6656!6m1!1e1
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-10-2017, 12:58 PM
 
Location: South Padre Island, TX
2,452 posts, read 2,301,415 times
Reputation: 1386
Quote:
Originally Posted by sav858 View Post
Really impressive, some shorty scrubby looking coconut trees that probably get killed off every 20 or so years....

And look at how excited all those "bloggers" are about it since it's so rare.
Well, in the end, Central Florida and coastal South Texas stand out as the only two areas of the continental US outside of South Florida that can get coconuts growing. They won't be as healthy or common as in the tropics, but they can still grow regardless.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sav858 View Post
Oh ok...maybe C-D should start hanging out certificates or degrees in city/urban planning to its longtime users. All one needs to do is participate in a blog to become an expert according to you....lol
I never said that membership was limited to just the online site:
International Palm Society

Quote:
Originally Posted by sav858 View Post
So you find washingtonia's just as attractive as sabals then right?
I hold them about the same, aesthetically. Washintonia filifera a little lower in attractiveness than the sabal palmetto, due to the skirt, while robusta is about the same, or higher (due to the height). But other species of sabal are abound, and can look quite exotic. Did you know that they recently discovered a new species?
http://www.mapress.com/j/pt/article/....303.1.4/10753

Quote:
Originally Posted by sav858 View Post
I don't like the look of them, something about their fronds I guess. Does it really matter what the reason is? I simply don't like the way they look. I don't really get why you take this so personal and have such trouble accepting that some people don't like sabal palm trees, it's really not that serious.
Fair enough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top