Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well I can see how. I live in Charlotte and my parents have been living in Greenville(Simpsonville) for about 4 years now. Greenville has little bit of a cosmopolitan vibe. Downtown Greenville is awesome no matter the size of the city it goes against.
If there's any city that can be considered a miniature Charlotte, it's definitely Greenville. Atlanta is really more of it's own thing and it's to find an alternate version, but I think you could see a little bit of Greenville, Birmingham, and even Charlotte in Atlanta in different ways.
If there's any city that can be considered a miniature Charlotte, it's definitely Greenville. Atlanta is really more of it's own thing and it's to find an alternate version, but I think you could see a little bit of Greenville, Birmingham, and even Charlotte in Atlanta in different ways.
IMO the built form/culture of these two seem way different...and no shade but I think San Antonio is the better city. Bigger isn't always better!
The best I can do for a "rich man's" San Antonio is San Diego. They both have the military, tourism, Spanish history, etc, but certainly San Diego is much more expensive, better located, and generally nicer.
I never been to Buffalo, Milwaukee and Salt Lake City. But can you give me your definition of a poor man's version of a city? I ask this because of COL in Reno is about the same as Salt Lake.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.