Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Raleigh closer in stature to which group?
Austin, Nashville, Charlotte 62 59.05%
Birmingham, Memphis, Richmond 25 23.81%
Somewhere in the middle 18 17.14%
Voters: 105. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-20-2020, 05:19 PM
 
37,877 posts, read 41,910,477 times
Reputation: 27274

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by murksiderock View Post
"Raleigh" isn't a reference to "Triangle" anywhere around here, literally nobody talks like that...
I think you should read my post again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-20-2020, 07:21 PM
 
16,690 posts, read 29,506,412 times
Reputation: 7665
Charlotte, Austin, Raleigh, Nashville


So...yes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2020, 02:04 AM
Status: "Freell" (set 2 days ago)
 
Location: Closer than you think!
2,856 posts, read 4,615,189 times
Reputation: 3138
Quote:
Originally Posted by QC Dreaming 2 View Post
Is Charlotte really still in that tier or is really at the bottom of the next tier? Or is it in a peculiar spot in it's own tier?
Charlotte is definitely in the tier with Tampa, Orlando, Baltimore and St. Louis.

Yet, for this thread, I'd place Raleigh in group 1.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2020, 09:43 AM
 
12 posts, read 7,337 times
Reputation: 43
Firm group 2
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2020, 09:51 AM
 
Location: New Albany, Indiana (Greater Louisville)
11,974 posts, read 25,466,576 times
Reputation: 12187
I struggle placing those multi central city metros in tiers. I would think just Raleigh vs just Birmingham would feel the same, but the metros aren't close to the same.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2020, 10:28 AM
 
8,302 posts, read 5,699,271 times
Reputation: 7557
Definitely closer to Austin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2020, 10:09 PM
 
Location: San Francisco
92 posts, read 105,532 times
Reputation: 183
It might be more important than Birmingham but at the moment it's closer in stature to it. Raleigh is not in the same league as Austin... maybe not for a very long while if ever.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2020, 10:28 PM
 
37,877 posts, read 41,910,477 times
Reputation: 27274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash Your Idols! View Post
It might be more important than Birmingham but at the moment it's closer in stature to it. Raleigh is not in the same league as Austin... maybe not for a very long while if ever.
As cities, Austin and Raleigh aren't in the same league, but I would most certainly say Raleigh is closer in stature to Austin than Birmingham. Stature means "importance or reputation gained by ability or achievement." Raleigh's importance and reputation derives from its status as the largest/representative city of its larger region, the Triangle, and it's pretty clear that Raleigh and Austin get many of the same accolades when it comes to economic performance and workforce quality in particular. Also the Triangle's higher education institutions themselves, primarily Duke and UNC and to a lesser extent, NCSU, have notable reputations in academics and basketball. And this is to say nothing of Raleigh's and Austin's shared status as state capitals of rapidly-growing, prosperous states. While Birmingham has more going for it than most give it credit for, it does not have the same importance and reputation due to ability or achievement in any of those areas as Raleigh or Austin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2020, 07:23 AM
 
11,781 posts, read 7,995,430 times
Reputation: 9931
I’d say overall closer to Group 1 (infact I have always associated the RTP triangle in this group), especially in terms of Growth. Raleigh to me feels like a less centralized east coast version of Austin with more greenery. Raleigh has made a very known establishment in the realm of tech and innovation as well as (and especially) education that you don’t find as sharply in Group 2. It might not be as strong as what is seen in Austin but that doesn’t necessarily make these achievements less relevant... I am constantly hearing about Raleigh in positive light in my field. (Tech)

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdw1084 View Post
Charlotte is definitely in the tier with Tampa, Orlando, Baltimore and St. Louis.

Yet, for this thread, I'd place Raleigh in group 1.
How is the Queen City in tier with Orlando and Tampa? Nothing against those places but CLT has made some serious milestones especially in the realm of FinTech and Banking.

Last edited by Need4Camaro; 10-29-2020 at 07:37 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-29-2020, 08:13 AM
 
37,877 posts, read 41,910,477 times
Reputation: 27274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Need4Camaro View Post
How is the Queen City in tier with Orlando and Tampa? Nothing against those places but CLT has made some serious milestones especially in the realm of FinTech and Banking.
You are definitely underestimating Orlando. It's a top-tier convention and tourism destination and is also a major aerospace and gaming software hub, all of which (plus UCF) contribute to its ascending tech sector. Although "best of" cities list are a dime a dozen these days, I consider Milken Institute's annual best performing cities ranking to be one of, if not the, most solid lists and Orlando has been a top 10 city on that list recently, including this year: https://milkeninstitute.org/sites/de...0%20Report.pdf

Tampa hasn't stood out as much in any one particular sector as Charlotte and Orlando, but all in all, they are all in the same tier of metros by every relevant metric.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top