Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No, their called left-leaning moderates. Liberals favor gay marriage rights. But you'll still call Obama a socialist, I suppose.
Umm well historically many in the inner party of socialists and communists have been stanch opponents of homosexuals and gay rights at least while governing the population of their countries.
Umm well historically many in the inner party of socialists and communists have been stanch opponents of homosexuals and gay rights at least while governing the population of their countries.
Read some on Castro and Stalin for example.
Castro and Stalin aren't exactly liberals. They were (are) totalitarian dictators. That's like me comparing George Bush to Hitler. And it's been a few years, you know!
I was using only two generalized terms here: moderate and liberal. While what you say is true to a degree,if you are only using two general terms like liberal and conservative, what I stated is still true.
Most left-leaning moderates vote Democratic much of the time and most right- leaning moderates vote Republican much of the time.
So let me rephrase my earlier statement: many moderate left-leaning women and blacks that tend to vote Democratic voted against gay marriage in California. That was the deciding factor for gay marriage being voted down in California.
I'll agree with that. As a left-leaning moderate myself, I do side with Republicans sometimes. But I'm sort of permanently pissed off at that party on the national level, so they won't be getting my votes for President or Congress for decades unless they change things drastically.
I would do Columbia, it is central to everything and great transportation. The south loop is also up and coming and still has decent rent prices around there. I personally don't think it is up for comparison, if it was San Francisco vs. Chicago, then maybe you would have a decision on your hands. I would definitely go to Chicago over L.A. though, L.A. to me is more like a sprawling suburb that is over priced, it doesn't have a big city feel at all. You won't need a car if you are going to Columbia either, vs. L.A. I would say you almost definitely want one. If you are fine with the weather in Boston, isn't going to be much difference from Chicago.
Castro and Stalin aren't exactly liberals. They were (are) totalitarian dictators. That's like me comparing George Bush to Hitler. And it's been a few years, you know!
Its funny. Those tyrants might not be liberals but liberals embrace Castro and Che as saviors. Liberals never made sense to me. These liberal fascist fight so much for animal rights, which included a ban on foie ban in Chicago, but they are such staunch supporters of pro choice which includes basically killing babies. I never understood that. Fight for the rights of duck and geese but not for a unborn baby. Also, most liberals do compare Bush with Hitler even though Bush took down two evil dictatorships.
Its funny. Those tyrants might not be liberals but liberals embrace Castro and Che as saviors. Liberals never made sense to me. These liberal fascist fight so much for animal rights, which included a ban on foie ban in Chicago, but they are such staunch supporters of pro choice which includes basically killing babies. I never understood that. Fight for the rights of duck and geese but not for a unborn baby. Also, most liberals do compare Bush with Hitler even though Bush took down two evil dictatorships.
I know a LOT of liberals, and none of them like Che or Castro in any way. Most (like 95%) are not animal rights fanatics. They don't compare anyone to Hitler other than actual Nazis. And some are even anti-abortion (though this is certainly not typical). You're confusing run-of-the-mill liberals with bat**** insane leftist radicals. One does not equal the other. And fascism is a right-wing movement, by the way!
I live in LA and absolutely love it. Ive been to Chicago and it is way to freaking cold and flat. I dont understand how people live without mountains or at least a little variety in the terrain. Lake Michigan also does not compare to the Pacific.
LA would be the place for you.......really good for art and music like disney concert hallif your a singer or musicianits hollywood, maybe youll get in American Idol or you'll get discovered by talent scoutsalso good for photography because of hollywood and maybe you could take photos of those modelsthere are also hotter people in LA so if ur looking for someone to date who is really good looking la is good for youUC schools are really good, like UCLA, one of LA's best to offer.thats all i can give right now let me know if u have more questions
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
