Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Do you not understand the difference between a homicide and a murder? How does the coroner's office accurately represent crimes? They just report how the victims were killed; gunshot, knife wound, blunt object, time of death, etc etc. Whether they were maliciously murdered, accidentally killed, or justifiably killed, is out of their hands.
The difference between a homicide or a murder isn't my point,My point is L.A County had over 2000+ bodies in 1992 that the Chicago character keeps trying to denounce
Because in this situation the city is still bigger geographically than the 5 counties. And if you go LA County it's way bigger than the 5 counties combined.
Bigger in sq miles ? Yes because the West has greater land mass than the Eastcoast region.Alot of the landscape in los Angeles is mountains/water area where people don't live.
New York is 5 counties with each holding at least 1-2 million citizens, If any other jurisdiction we're to annex 5 counties under 1 city the population would be massive as well.
Which micropolitan city was the most dangerous in the 90s ( Besides East St. Louis)?
First I checked Compton and Gary and saw they had (70...75)/100k average in the early 90s (dropped in second half of the decade) and I thought that's it. But then I typed East St. Louis and saw cca 130/100k average for 88-92. Just wow. I also checked Flint an Camden, but they're not even close. Those are the small cities I know of that are dangerous, maybe there's something else.
First I checked Compton and Gary and saw they had (70...75)/100k average in the early 90s (dropped in second half of the decade) and I thought that's it. But then I typed East St. Louis and saw cca 130/100k average for 88-92. Just wow. I also checked Flint an Camden, but they're not even close. Those are the small cities I know of that are dangerous, maybe there's something else.
You can go check on Uniform Crime Reprt Statistics website if they have data for places <50k. The only problem is you have to chose towns manually, so you have to kind of guess which might have high crime or murder rate. I mean, there's hundreds of places with <50k.
You can go check on Uniform Crime Reprt Statistics website if they have data for places <50k. The only problem is you have to chose towns manually, so you have to kind of guess which might have high crime or murder rate. I mean, there's hundreds of places with <50k.
LoL at the last statement. Same goes for cities above 50k.
Are you really not capable of understanding what I wanted to say...? Sad.
Yes. Im pointing out the obvious. You understand?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
