Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-01-2010, 11:21 PM
 
Location: NOVA
316 posts, read 654,729 times
Reputation: 339

Advertisements

I think when people are bashing LA, they are bashing it mainly because of Hollywood. It could be that the people are jealous of the individuals fame or they could be like me, get tired of seeing them on tv 24/7
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-01-2010, 11:54 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
4,027 posts, read 7,288,050 times
Reputation: 1333
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockford101 View Post
LA is awesome. It should not be ripped on.

A bad American city would be Chicago. It's the nation's murder capital, has suffered the greatest population loss, is the most segregated city in America, it's the most polluted city, and has been rated America's most miserable city.

Oh, and the Governor is in jail, and the Mayor is on his way.
I didn't know that Chicago had it's own Governor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2010, 12:10 AM
 
Location: Chicago
721 posts, read 1,793,937 times
Reputation: 451
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rockford101 View Post
LA is awesome. It should not be ripped on.

A bad American city would be Chicago. It's the nation's murder capital, has suffered the greatest population loss, is the most segregated city in America, it's the most polluted city, and has been rated America's most miserable city.

Oh, and the Governor is in jail, and the Mayor is on his way.
You really nailed that one

I don't think most people are jealous of L.A. It doesn't offer anything that most people couldn't do without. It has weather going for it, but that's pretty much it. In my opinion, Suburban L.A is A LOT better than the city. I don't care for the city at all, but I found the suburbs pretty fun.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2010, 12:19 AM
 
141 posts, read 196,222 times
Reputation: 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by cordtwo View Post
I think when people are bashing LA, they are bashing it mainly because of Hollywood. It could be that the people are jealous of the individuals fame or they could be like me, get tired of seeing them on tv 24/7


I've known many travelers (family and friends) who bashed/hated Los Angeles and "Hollywood" was the least of their problems. Well Hollywood itself as seedy as it looked was part of the problem, LOL.

I've travelled with people from Europe to LA, and they all come to the city expecting it to look like Baywatch and be all glamorous when it is the complete opposite.

LA isn't a very tourist friendly city. It's a dump on the surface, and tourists are too lazy to explore all the great parts of the city.

It isn't like New York, San Francisco, Boston or Chicago where the cab dumps you in the city center and you're in the middle of it all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2010, 12:23 AM
 
981 posts, read 805,848 times
Reputation: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDGJFK View Post
???

No. I've known many travelers (family and friends) who bashed/hated Los Angeles and "Hollywood" was the least of their problems. Well Hollywood itself as seedy as it looked was part of the problem, LOL.

I've travelled with people from Europe to LA, and they all come to the city expecting it to look like Baywatch and be all glamorous when it is the complete opposite.

LA isn't a very tourist friendly city. It's a dump on the surface, and tourists are too lazy to explore all the great parts of the city.

It isn't like New York, San Francisco or Chicago where the cab dumps you in the city center and you're in the middle of it all.
Many parts of NYC are an absolute mess to look at. LA has tons more natural beauty than NYC. It's just that the infrastructure and layout of the city is unlike any other American city, including NYC. That's what makes it such a wonderful and unique place.

BTW, I don't mean to startle you, but your jealousy is showing. Again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2010, 12:26 AM
 
981 posts, read 805,848 times
Reputation: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dncr View Post
You really nailed that one

I don't think most people are jealous of L.A. It doesn't offer anything that most people couldn't do without. It has weather going for it, but that's pretty much it. In my opinion, Suburban L.A is A LOT better than the city. I don't care for the city at all, but I found the suburbs pretty fun.
No, trust me, most people are just jealous. They'll try and deny it using every distracting and random thing they can think up, distancing themselves as much as they possibly can from the jealousy factor, but it's always there, right underneath the surface.

If I didn't live in LA and lived in a place like Chicagno or NYPuh-leez, I'd be pretty damn discontent myself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2010, 12:27 AM
 
Location: Denver
6,625 posts, read 14,456,812 times
Reputation: 4201
Quote:
Originally Posted by justcause View Post
Many parts of NYC are an absolute mess to look at. LA has tons more natural beauty than NYC. It's just that the infrastructure and layout of the city is unlike any other American city, including NYC. That's what makes it such a wonderful and unique place.

BTW, I don't mean to startle you, but your jealousy is showing. Again.
Hmm...wouldn't the typical grid layout and highway-domination over thousands of square miles make Los Angeles the poster-child of the "typical" American city? It's natural beauty is unique...but as far as I can tell the infrastructure layout of Los Angeles has been emulated by nearly every major city that saw most of its development occur after World War II.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2010, 12:32 AM
 
141 posts, read 196,222 times
Reputation: 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by justcause View Post
Many parts of NYC are an absolute mess to look at. LA has tons more natural beauty than NYC. It's just that the infrastructure and layout of the city is unlike any other American city, including NYC. That's what makes it such a wonderful and unique place.

BTW, I don't mean to startle you, but your jealousy is showing. Again.

Jealousy?

LOL, I guess this "natural beauty" you speak of holds no weight since LA is continually ranked at the bottom amongst cesspools like Detroit. I am not trying to talk down on LA, just explaining the LA contempt. It's not my fault, really.

And the difference between LA and NYC is that you can live and visit NYC and never ever have to see the nasty parts. Tourists in New York are in Manhattan and will never see a bad part.

In LA, tourists have to drive everywhere and many have to drive through those third world Tijuana looking neighborhoods.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2010, 12:38 AM
 
981 posts, read 805,848 times
Reputation: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDGJFK View Post
Jealousy?

LOL, I guess this "natural beauty" you speak of holds no weight since LA is continually ranked at the bottom amongst cesspools like Detroit. I am not trying to talk down on LA, just explaining the LA contempt. It's not my fault, really.

And the difference between LA and NYC is that you can live and visit NYC and never ever have to see the nasty parts. Tourists in New York are in Manhattan and will never see a bad part.

In LA, tourists have to drive everywhere and many have to drive through those third world Tijuana looking neighborhoods.
If tourists are too idiotic to use maps and the freeway system, that's their own problem.

And, you speak as if not seeing the bad parts of NYC somehow erases them. It doesn't. They're still there, and the blight is extremely apparent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2010, 12:40 AM
 
981 posts, read 805,848 times
Reputation: 215
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmac9wr View Post
Hmm...wouldn't the typical grid layout and highway-domination over thousands of square miles make Los Angeles the poster-child of the "typical" American city? It's natural beauty is unique...but as far as I can tell the infrastructure layout of Los Angeles has been emulated by nearly every major city that saw most of its development occur after World War II.
Perhaps...but what I was really referring to was how the city has been incoporated into its natural setting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top