Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-14-2020, 04:16 PM
 
8,856 posts, read 6,846,043 times
Reputation: 8651

Advertisements

The San Francisco area is one economy (for workers, companies, etc.) and one media market (i.e. culture and identity in many ways). The metro split isn't terribly relevant to most things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-14-2020, 04:16 PM
 
Location: Houston/Austin, TX
9,849 posts, read 6,566,773 times
Reputation: 6399
LA is easily below NYC, no questions asked not even lose. But it’s also easily above the rest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2020, 05:27 PM
 
309 posts, read 307,416 times
Reputation: 460
Quote:
Originally Posted by As Above So Below... View Post
1) DFW is one metro are. San Jose and San Francisco are not.
Except people who actually live there feel and treat it as a singular metropolitan region...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2020, 05:28 PM
 
49 posts, read 57,980 times
Reputation: 83
I live in the Bay. No one considers the San Jose area as a separate area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2020, 05:39 PM
 
Location: Dallas, Texas
4,435 posts, read 6,296,352 times
Reputation: 3827
Quote:
Originally Posted by bayarearelocation View Post
I live in the Bay. No one considers the San Jose area as a separate area.
SF and SJ metros should be combined to a single metro.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2020, 05:44 PM
 
Location: Houston/Austin, TX
9,849 posts, read 6,566,773 times
Reputation: 6399
I whole heartedly agree with these above. I haven't lived in either but have visited both and know people from both (DFW a lot more so than SF). And both are attached in certain aspects and separated in others. If Dallas and Fort Worth combine, SF and SJ would too. We call it the Bay Area for a reason.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2020, 05:50 PM
 
8,302 posts, read 5,696,736 times
Reputation: 7557
Dallas and Fort Worth are combined because Fort Worth isn't really a big employment hub in DFW. In fact, a significant number of the resident from Tarrant County end up commuting to Dallas and Collin Counties for work.

Source:

Identity crisis: Is Fort Worth becoming a Dallas suburb?

Conversely, there's far less commuting overlap between San Jose and San Francisco because San Jose (at least the county it's in) *IS* a big employment hub.

Last edited by citidata18; 12-14-2020 at 06:15 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2020, 05:56 PM
 
49 posts, read 57,980 times
Reputation: 83
Quote:
Originally Posted by ParaguaneroSwag View Post
I whole heartedly agree with these above. I haven't lived in either but have visited both and know people from both (DFW a lot more so than SF). And both are attached in certain aspects and separated in others. If Dallas and Fort Worth combine, SF and SJ would too. We call it the Bay Area for a reason.
They are not separated in any way. Theree is a commuter train that links San Jose and San Francisco and the BART as well (light and heavy rail). They are within a 45 minute drive of each other on a good traffic day. The San Francisco 49ers play in San Jose. The idea that San Francisco, Oakland, or San Jose should be in different MSA's is stupid and I don't know why this is the case at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2020, 05:58 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
8,319 posts, read 5,478,374 times
Reputation: 12279
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2000_Watts View Post
Except people who actually live there feel and treat it as a singular metropolitan region...
I totally get that. I was just going off metro areas because that’s what GDP was broken down with in another thread. It’s not personal
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2020, 06:02 PM
 
Location: North Raleigh x North Sacramento
5,819 posts, read 5,619,238 times
Reputation: 7117
Quote:
Originally Posted by As Above So Below... View Post
I totally get that. I was just going off metro areas because that’s what GDP was broken down with in another thread. It’s not personal
If you were going off metro area how does Raleigh end up in the tier that you have it in?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top