Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-02-2015, 11:02 AM
 
Location: Upstate NY 🇺🇸
36,754 posts, read 14,822,859 times
Reputation: 35584

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TimTheEnchanter View Post
It proves they were not unduly burdened by the florist declining their business.
Exactly. Which makes me wonder what the damages are.
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-02-2015, 11:07 AM
 
Location: California side of the Sierras
11,162 posts, read 7,635,022 times
Reputation: 12523
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delahanty View Post
Exactly. Which makes me wonder what the damages are.
Jjrose provided a link to the actual court documents yesterday.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2015, 11:08 AM
 
Location: Hialeah, Florida
506 posts, read 426,583 times
Reputation: 1334
Quote:
Originally Posted by delahanty View Post
exactly. Which makes me wonder what the damages are.
Quote:
in law, damages are an award, typically of money, to be paid to a person as compensation for loss or injury.[1] the rules for damages can and frequently do vary based on the type of claim which is presented (e.g., breach of contract versus a tort claim) and the jurisdiction.

at common law, damages are categorized into compensatory (or actual) damages, and punitive damages. Compensatory damages are further categorized into special damages, which are economic losses such as loss of earnings, property damage and medical expenses, and general damages, which are noneconomic damages such as pain and suffering and emotional distress.
Spoiler
123456789
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2015, 11:21 AM
 
Location: Corona del Mar, CA - Coronado, CA
4,477 posts, read 3,300,017 times
Reputation: 5609
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
That is exactly what the couple did. they told friends, who told others, eventually it went viral and the state contacted them about the event. They didn't run out to get a lawyer. It was the AG that brought up charges.
That would be incorrect. The couple went out and got the ACLU to sue for them. The State of Washington's suit was a separate case that the judge later joined together.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2015, 12:08 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,203,370 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delahanty View Post
Exactly. Which makes me wonder what the damages are.
Fines for breaking the law. Originally it was $2001 but it was lowered to $1001. The florist still refuses to pay the fine.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2015, 12:19 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,203,370 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimTheEnchanter View Post
That would be incorrect. The couple went out and got the ACLU to sue for them. The State of Washington's suit was a separate case that the judge later joined together.
You may want to check your facts.
The STATE filed the original suit. The couple filed later. They didn't walk out and get on the phone with the ACLU.

Quote:
In March, Arlene’s Flowers & Gifts in Richland, Washington refused to provide wedding flowers to Rob Ingersoll and his partner, even though they’d been long-time customers of the florist. After owner Barronelle Stutzman informed Ingersoll that she could not provide the flowers because of her “relationship with Jesus Christ,” Ingersoll shared his story online and the news went viral.
Now, State Attorney General Bob Ferguson has filed a consumer protection lawsuit against Arlene’s Flowers for violating the state’s nondiscrimination protections based on sexual orientation:
Washington Attorney General Sues Florist For Anti-Gay Discrimination | ThinkProgress
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2015, 05:58 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
5,621 posts, read 5,933,278 times
Reputation: 4900
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjasse View Post
LOL. There's no 'grandfathering' exemptions of civil rights laws. Whitey's Dixie Wizard Diner doesn't get to keep a "coloreds only" bathroom because it's been open since the 1950s.
Best thing I've seen on this site in a long time.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2015, 08:24 PM
 
920 posts, read 633,729 times
Reputation: 643
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
Fines for breaking the law. Originally it was $2001 but it was lowered to $1001. The florist still refuses to pay the fine.
That's right. It's called courage of your convictions. People who live their lives based on moral equivalency don't, and likely never will, understand that concept.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2015, 08:24 PM
 
477 posts, read 509,236 times
Reputation: 1558
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConeyGirl52 View Post
Gay marriage being legal is new??? Gay marriage was totally illegal 40 years ago when she started her business - and, for most of the time her business existed.

Her business should be grandfathered in, as it were.
You know, this could almost be funny, if it weren't so blatantly bigoted. According to this "logic", segregation laws should not have been applied to businesses that were in existence before the laws were changed.

Heck, for that matter, any person who was enslaved prior to the Emancipation Proclamation should have been "grandfathered in" and remained a slave to the end of his/her life - and any person who was a slaveholder prior to the EP would be "grandfathered in" and could keep his/her slaves, and keep any offspring enslaved, and continue to trade slaves with other "grandfathered in" slave holders.

I guarantee you that in 40 years, that woman has sold hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of flowers to gay people. So just when was she planning on refunding all that money and not ever selling so much as a boutonnière to a gay man ever again?

Religious belief is not an excuse to discriminate against people you don't like. Non-violent hate crime is still hate crime.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2015, 08:28 PM
 
920 posts, read 633,729 times
Reputation: 643
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
Fines for breaking the law. Originally it was $2001 but it was lowered to $1001. The florist still refuses to pay the fine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
Please point out in the court documents where she was asked to deliver, or do anything specific regarding the flowers for the couple.
That is another red herring. I don't have to show you anything. Court documents don't contain the entire testimony given under oath. Deposition transcripts are no longer filed with the courts. If you want to proved copies to me, I would be happy to review them for you.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top