Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That is ***IF*** he gets the death penalty. The only way (and the only reason) he would get the death penalty is because this is a high-profile case and every black american will come out of the woodwork to pressure the system and demand a death penalty for him. This is also a PRIME TIME for white politicians to get in on the mix and rally up minority support... if they agree to put this one man to death, they can brag for the rest of time that they love minorities (so that they will vote for them).
In the hands of white Americans, he wouldn't get the death penalty.... I'm not even sure he'll get it with a 1/2 black jury.
Think back on the incident that happened in Arizona some years ago... a shooter (Jared L) shot Senator Giffords. He killed 6 people, injured 13 and no death penalty.
They're already saying things like "He dropped out of school in the 9th grade, he's not smart enough to write a coherent sentence and pull a trigger!" and "He's young, he was brainwashed and didn't know any better" or "his father abused him and he had a broken home" or "he's just mentally ill" -- aren't you hearing all the excuses already? I am.
We shall see...
Infants and toddlers too? They're Black Americans.
Agreed, he will be hailed as a hero by the members of any white pride prison gang. He will probably have a great life on the inside surrounded by his type of people.
I am wrong? Alright -- then PROVE ME WRONG. You cannot simply state that something is wrong without providing ample proof to support your argument. Go ahead. I'll be back to check in after you think up something.
I am wrong? Alright -- then PROVE ME WRONG. You cannot simply state that something is wrong without providing ample proof to support your argument. Go ahead. I'll be back to check in after you think up something.
Sorry sweetie, you made the claim so the onus is on you to prove your statement.
I am wrong? Alright -- then PROVE ME WRONG. You cannot simply state that something is wrong without providing ample proof to support your argument. Go ahead. I'll be back to check in after you think up something.
And apparently you're dimwitted if you make a bald assertion and when challenged expect others to disprove it.
Sorry sweetie, you made the claim so the onus is on you to prove your statement.
NO. What I did was provide MY personal perspective on the issue. Because the truth of my perspective rubs some people the wrong way, a no-name comes along and claims that I am wrong. Then prove how my perspective is wrong. End story.
Don't get your panties in a ruffle because many people CAN sympathize with Dylann. That was my perspective. Its honest and if you don't like it, that's not my problem.
And apparently you're dimwitted if you make a bald assertion and when challenged expect others to disprove it.
Edit: Gah, shadowne beat me to it.
What I said is honest. Many whites can understand what Dylann did. Does that mean simply because we are white we support him? Hell no. However, a large chunk of us can understand his actions despite not agreeing with his actions. That is my stance.
So now I am "wrong, nuts and whatever-have-you" because I spoke the truth that happens not to be politically correct or what other people WANT TO HEAR? Intriguing...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.