Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-09-2015, 04:36 PM
 
158 posts, read 200,341 times
Reputation: 189

Advertisements

I think the feds did keep this a secret. Because i never knew that jared had a partner who was arrested for child porn. This seems like they didn't make jared involved at first.

How many of us knew that jared was partners with a child porn producer before all of this.

So I think the feds and media did their best to leave jared out of this debacle for a while.

So we can't blame the feds or media for a scandal that could have been mentioned when the partner was first arrested.

So the media and feds did give jared the benefit of the doubt at first. Jmo
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-10-2015, 06:29 AM
 
Location: Fishers, IN
4,970 posts, read 6,271,677 times
Reputation: 4945
A lady in Florida claims she's the one that tipped the FBI off to Jared. No word what it was exactly that made her do that other than some "alarming" statements he made to her.

Florida woman claims she tipped off FBI on Jared Fogle | WISH-TV

Also, Jared's foundation's website has been shut down ever since his raid. Nothing but blank white pages across the whole site. Local news is also reporting the phone number listed for the foundation is now out of service as well.

Jared Foundation website taken down after raid on Fogle home - 13 WTHR Indianapolis
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2015, 07:57 AM
 
3,205 posts, read 2,625,343 times
Reputation: 8570
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dexter Morgan View Post
It looks like he knows that his crap has just hit the fan and his feces will be everywhere . He couldn't even look the dude in the eyes nor the camera that caught him getting in his lawyer car. Anyone of us would have been pissed and said this is bull sh#t. You are losing endorsements. Your kids were home at the time. You wake me up with 30 detectives in front of my home. Wtf.

He should have been looking pissed off and irate. And not this scared, I'm busted secrecy look. Jmo
I'm sure the first thing he did was call his lawyer, who told him NOT to react and NOT to engage the press.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2015, 09:20 AM
 
17,599 posts, read 15,279,200 times
Reputation: 22920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dexter Morgan View Post
I think the feds did keep this a secret. Because i never knew that jared had a partner who was arrested for child porn. This seems like they didn't make jared involved at first.

How many of us knew that jared was partners with a child porn producer before all of this.

So I think the feds and media did their best to leave jared out of this debacle for a while.

So we can't blame the feds or media for a scandal that could have been mentioned when the partner was first arrested.

So the media and feds did give jared the benefit of the doubt at first. Jmo
If a janitor at a school murders his wife.. They don't have any reason to suspect the principal of being involved. Same here.. So, that would more be the reason that they didn't do anything at the start with him.

Something was developed from there that did make them look at him.

Someone here mentioned that they worked somewhere that someone was busted.. He (the person talking here) didn't have his home raided at the same time. Even though they may have communicated as part of work.

This woman's story seems.. Weird to me.. There's information that we obviously don't have yet that will probably shed some light on the whole thing.

as for you not knowing that his partner was busted.. Just because you don't see the stories on it, doesn't mean it didn't happen.. It wasn't huge news at the time, but I remember seeing it.. Jared Foundation executive director facing child exploitation charges

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...icle-1.2213078

Jared Foundation executive director arrested for child porn | WISH-TV

The sad thing here, or at least one of the sad things.. Is that you really have to hope that he WAS involved in it somehow.. because, if he wasn't.. And he was, for lack of a better term, swatted by this woman in Florida.. That is just scary as hell.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2015, 11:34 AM
 
158 posts, read 200,341 times
Reputation: 189
Quote:
Originally Posted by Labonte18 View Post
If a janitor at a school murders his wife.. They don't have any reason to suspect the principal of being involved. Same here.. So, that would more be the reason that they didn't do anything at the start with him.

Something was developed from there that did make them look at him.

Someone here mentioned that they worked somewhere that someone was busted.. He (the person talking here) didn't have his home raided at the same time. Even though they may have communicated as part of work.

This woman's story seems.. Weird to me.. There's information that we obviously don't have yet that will probably shed some light on the whole thing.

as for you not knowing that his partner was busted.. Just because you don't see the stories on it, doesn't mean it didn't happen.. It wasn't huge news at the time, but I remember seeing it.. Jared Foundation executive director facing child exploitation charges

Jared Foundation exec attempts suicide after child porn bust - NY Daily News

Jared Foundation executive director arrested for child porn | WISH-TV

The sad thing here, or at least one of the sad things.. Is that you really have to hope that he WAS involved in it somehow.. because, if he wasn't.. And he was, for lack of a better term, swatted by this woman in Florida.. That is just scary as hell.
I forgot about celebrity swatting. BUt since this lady was working with the feds before all of this; Than something was definitely amiss. Because this was before Taylor became on the radar. Jmo
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2015, 01:21 PM
 
17,599 posts, read 15,279,200 times
Reputation: 22920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dexter Morgan View Post
I forgot about celebrity swatting. BUt since this lady was working with the feds before all of this; Than something was definitely amiss. Because this was before Taylor became on the radar. Jmo
I don't know.. I've read the story again, and.. Like I said before, there's GOT to be some big piece of info that we're missing that makes all this add up.

Quote:
Fox59, citing unnamed sources, reports the woman spoke to Fogle on several occasions more than a decade ago. In an interview with WWSB, the woman said Fogle often made “surprising and inappropriate” remarks.
“He said something to me when we were off camera and that really stuck with me,” she told the station. “I thought to myself, â€Did he really say that to me?’”

Ok, so, the comments were made more than a decade ago.. And.. "Surprising and inappropriate", well.. I figure we all say surprising and inappropriate things at times.. What the hell would someone have to say to you to make you think they were collecting/producing child porn though? I think i'd have to hear words saying that's what they were doing to make me think that.



Quote:
She said she contacted the FBI because Fogle’s comments alarmed her, according to the report. The woman said authorities had her wear a wire and record phone conversations with him. She claims the subject matter was “similar to what the FBI found when they raided his home.”

So, she wore a wire.. A decade ago? She wore a wire recently and reconnected with him to ask about whatever he said a decade ago? Did he just casually mention that he liked watching child porn or something?



Did she do all that in the past and it's only because of his associate being busted that they felt there was enough to move forward with a search?


Or, is this woman just off her nut and looking for publicity and has nothing whatsoever to do with anything?


That last one is the only one that makes any kind of sense to me in the whole situation.


Again.. I'm turning the corner to hoping that he was involved in something, because the alternative is far worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2015, 03:23 PM
 
158 posts, read 200,341 times
Reputation: 189
Quote:
Originally Posted by Labonte18 View Post
I don't know.. I've read the story again, and.. Like I said before, there's GOT to be some big piece of info that we're missing that makes all this add up.




Ok, so, the comments were made more than a decade ago.. And.. "Surprising and inappropriate", well.. I figure we all say surprising and inappropriate things at times.. What the hell would someone have to say to you to make you think they were collecting/producing child porn though? I think i'd have to hear words saying that's what they were doing to make me think that.






So, she wore a wire.. A decade ago? She wore a wire recently and reconnected with him to ask about whatever he said a decade ago? Did he just casually mention that he liked watching child porn or something?



Did she do all that in the past and it's only because of his associate being busted that they felt there was enough to move forward with a search?


Or, is this woman just off her nut and looking for publicity and has nothing whatsoever to do with anything?


That last one is the only one that makes any kind of sense to me in the whole situation.


Again.. I'm turning the corner to hoping that he was involved in something, because the alternative is far worse.
Very good analysis of that. Was this wire years ago or what. Why is she talking about 10 year old conversations. Why is the feds letting her open her mouth about wire taps.

But agree. She is just putting stuff out there but not really saying anything at all. I think whatever investigation she was a part of was years ago and it didn't bare fruit.

But now she is coming out like she broke this case. I don't trust her too much. Jmo
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2015, 03:36 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
11,350 posts, read 16,714,274 times
Reputation: 13393
Freakin joke. The woman who ratted him out says he make some weird comments over 10 years ago and NOW it bothered her.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2015, 04:01 PM
 
158 posts, read 200,341 times
Reputation: 189
Quote:
Originally Posted by camaro69 View Post
Freakin joke. The woman who ratted him out says he make some weird comments over 10 years ago and NOW it bothered her.
Agree. But to tell you the truth. Whether he is guilty or innocent i dont know.

But his wife may want a swift divorce to make sure that their assets are not all eating up by the courts and civil suits. Jmo.

The wife has to now decide to financially protect her and the kids and him as well by having a quick divorce where she gets everything. Jmo.

I don't care if I'm innocent or not. I would definitely allow my wife and kids to legally be awarded all my money now. Just leave me enough for defense fees and that's it.

Once I'm found innocent. We will remarry later. Jmo. But if you are truly innocent. Than it shouldn't take matlock or jessica fletcher to prove it. But you still are required as a husband to financially protect your family under bogus or non bogus coury cases. And if that means a temporary divorce; Than so be it.


As long as the wife wasn't the one framing you. Lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2015, 04:06 PM
 
Location: Nashville TN
4,918 posts, read 6,474,580 times
Reputation: 4778
Never trust the federal govt, the local police or the Feds, they set people up all the time for crimes especially if its organized crime. I don't trust anybody that works in our federal govt with anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:10 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top