Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-11-2015, 05:16 PM
 
Location: Ruidoso, NM
5,668 posts, read 6,598,326 times
Reputation: 4817

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Barbara View Post
Over the past 35 years, the productivity of American workers has increased by 90%. The incomes of the top 1% have increased by about 240% while the income of a typical worker has increased by about 8%. If the wages of workers had increased at the same rate as their productivity, the median US income today would be about $90,000 instead of about $50,000.
Great point! Yes, we wouldn't be nearly so worried about taxes, or funding SS, or the high cost of education if our incomes were nearly 2x as high!

Except I'd like to point at an important aspect of the "1%". From the 99.0 to 99.9%ile incomes rose <100%. In other words that gain was right around the productivity increase, so nothing extraordinary. But income gains become increasingly huge above that level, with the 99.99+%ile (top 0.01%) seeing about a 700% increase!

So when we talk about the 1% we are completely missing just how few hands all of our gains of the last 35 years have landed in. Most of it has gone to a very select group of mega-rich. And the odds are great that the ones who benefited the most are the same ones who've managed to manipulate government polices in their favor. In other words, oligarchy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-11-2015, 05:46 PM
 
1,820 posts, read 1,655,976 times
Reputation: 1091
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultrarunner View Post
Toyota closing Nummi is fact...
Nummi (for New United Motor Manufacturing Inc.) was a joint project with GM. GM was forced to pull out during their bankruptcy proceedings. Toyota was not willing to carry the plant all by itself. Nothing more to it than that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2015, 06:09 PM
 
1,820 posts, read 1,655,976 times
Reputation: 1091
Quote:
Originally Posted by rruff View Post
Great point! Yes, we wouldn't be nearly so worried about taxes, or funding SS, or the high cost of education if our incomes were nearly 2x as high!
As I've noted before, the Europeans have for the most part sensibly taken care to assure that their middle and working classes are paid well enough to be able to afford to pay the taxes needed to fund the welfare systems they ultimately need. We have NOT done that. It is only the wealthy in this country who can afford to pay for the welfare systems that the middle and working classes need. Bad planning by us.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rruff View Post
Except I'd like to point at an important aspect of the "1%". From the 99.0 to 99.9%ile incomes rose <100%. In other words that gain was right around the productivity increase, so nothing extraordinary. But income gains become increasingly huge above that level, with the 99.99+%ile (top 0.01%) seeing about a 700% increase!
Yes, in some sense there's a whole fractal dimension to all this. The bottom 90% of the top 1% are being abused to the same relative degree as the bottom 90% of the 100%.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rruff View Post
In other words, oligarchy.
Not there yet, and I doubt that we'll ever get to that point. I could be wrong of course, if people just fall asleep.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2015, 06:18 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,750,585 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Barbara View Post
As I've noted before, the Europeans have for the most part sensibly taken care to assure that their middle and working classes are paid well enough to be able to afford to pay the taxes needed to fund the welfare systems they ultimately need. We have NOT done that. It is only the wealthy in this country who can afford to pay for the welfare systems that the middle and working classes need. Bad planning by us.


Yes, in some sense there's a whole fractal dimension to all this. The bottom 90% of the top 1% are being abused to the same relative degree as the bottom 90% of the 100%.


Not there yet, and I doubt that we'll ever get to that point. I could be wrong of course, if people just fall asleep.
I thought the Democrats New Deal was supposed to reduce poverty? So after 50 years it didn't work so lets keep doing more of the same. While your at it throw money my way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2015, 06:25 PM
509
 
6,321 posts, read 7,052,709 times
Reputation: 9450
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
I thought the Democrats New Deal was supposed to reduce poverty? So after 50 years it didn't work so lets keep doing more of the same. While your at it throw money my way.
It has reduced poverty. You only have to read the stories from the Great Depression.

Poverty in the United States is that of the mind and opportunity. I heard a statement that our welfare residents are in the top 1% in income on a world wide basis.

We really need to focus on opportunity. If you want to stay poor....fine. But anybody that has the gumption and effort to work their way out of poverty should get all the help they need.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2015, 06:30 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,750,585 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by 509 View Post
It has reduced poverty. You only have to read the stories from the Great Depression.

Poverty in the United States is that of the mind and opportunity. I heard a statement that our welfare residents are in the top 1% in income on a world wide basis.

We really need to focus on opportunity. If you want to stay poor....fine. But anybody that has the gumption and effort to work their way out of poverty should get all the help they need.
So we don't have poverty anymore? Great!!!! we don't need to pay welfare then.

Read how the U.S. almost went into another depression then there was WWII.

//www.city-data.com/forum/polit...ate-under.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2015, 06:36 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,750,585 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by 509 View Post
It has reduced poverty. You only have to read the stories from the Great Depression.

Poverty in the United States is that of the mind and opportunity. I heard a statement that our welfare residents are in the top 1% in income on a world wide basis.

We really need to focus on opportunity. If you want to stay poor....fine. But anybody that has the gumption and effort to work their way out of poverty should get all the help they need.
LOL, people don't want help. They want to have pity parties for themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2015, 06:41 PM
 
14,400 posts, read 14,318,816 times
Reputation: 45732
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
So we don't have poverty anymore? Great!!!! we don't need to pay welfare then.

Read how the U.S. almost went into another depression then there was WWII.

//www.city-data.com/forum/polit...ate-under.html
You're funny. Poverty has been reduced substantially. Just since the 1960's its been reduced by 1/3 and the figure was more like 50% until the recession of 2008.

So, in your mind since it has not been 100% eliminated you judge these programs a failure. Pretty hard to reason with someone who thinks like that. Nothing on earth is perfect. Including the capitalist system. Remember that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2015, 06:43 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,384,355 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
So we don't have poverty anymore? Great!!!! we don't need to pay welfare then.

Read how the U.S. almost went into another depression then there was WWII.

//www.city-data.com/forum/polit...ate-under.html
Oh great, we've stopped the leak in the boat by bailing it out, See? It isn't rising anymore....lets stop bailing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-11-2015, 06:45 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,750,585 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by markg91359 View Post
You're funny. Poverty has been reduced substantially. Just since the 1960's its been reduced by 1/3 and the figure was more like 50% until the recession of 2008.

So, in your mind since it has not been 100% eliminated you judge these programs a failure. Pretty hard to reason with someone who thinks like that. Nothing on earth is perfect. Including the capitalist system. Remember that.
I know nothing is perfect and why I prefer to use my money to take care of my family, not yours. I don't want to waste my money on a government that gives money to people who refuse to do anything to help themselves.

You want to give your money away, do it then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:46 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top