Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-24-2016, 09:17 AM
 
18,805 posts, read 8,479,367 times
Reputation: 4131

Advertisements

How much more would my cellphone and a thousand other things cost if it were made here?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-24-2016, 09:28 AM
 
5,760 posts, read 11,550,601 times
Reputation: 4949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
How much more would my cellphone and a thousand other things cost if it were made here?
Likely . . . . NOTHING more.

The use and rush to the foreign labor is for Fast, along with Cheap.

But at this point even Apple is reaching the Shame Point (I suppose everyone has one) to Automate Production.

Automation just takes time to set up. The overall costs are about the same.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2016, 10:00 AM
 
Location: Ruidoso, NM
5,668 posts, read 6,598,326 times
Reputation: 4817
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
How much more would my cellphone and a thousand other things cost if it were made here?
Man, it doesn't even matter! Why are you still hung up on this?

The CPI adjusted compensation graph relative to GDP/capita tells you everything you need to know. It tells us that median compensation relative to the cost of products and services has been flat for 40 years. Like I've already told you a half dozen times, it's already corrected for the cost of goods!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2016, 10:18 AM
 
18,805 posts, read 8,479,367 times
Reputation: 4131
Quote:
Originally Posted by rruff View Post
Man, it doesn't even matter! Why are you still hung up on this?

The CPI adjusted compensation graph relative to GDP/capita tells you everything you need to know. It tells us that median compensation relative to the cost of products and services has been flat for 40 years. Like I've already told you a half dozen times, it's already corrected for the cost of goods!
I understand that. The middle class industrial based workers have languished. I agree and IMO one of our major problems today.

But even the relative minority put out of work get cheaper stuff, and the rest of our multitudes would have to suffer higher prices.

It would be worse for the multitudes. Better for the few with all local production.

Again on balance, better for the whole.

Our direction should be central relief for the displaced workers. Not tariffs and not minimum wages that the employer has to pay. Central policies and moneys.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2016, 10:31 AM
 
Location: Ruidoso, NM
5,668 posts, read 6,598,326 times
Reputation: 4817
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
I understand that... again on balance, better for the whole.
No, you still don't get it.

It's real simple. How can you agree *real* income has been flat for 40 years, and then proclaim that it has been better for the whole?!

The only "whole" it has beneficial to is the 99.9+ %ile. That is the only demographic that has done better than the last 40 years (and long term) per capita GDP rate. The reason they have done better is because all their income comes from profits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2016, 10:57 AM
 
18,805 posts, read 8,479,367 times
Reputation: 4131
Quote:
Originally Posted by rruff View Post
No, you still don't get it.

It's real simple. How can you agree *real* income has been flat for 40 years, and then proclaim that it has been better for the whole?!

The only "whole" it has beneficial to is the 99.9+ %ile. That is the only demographic that has done better than the last 40 years (and long term) per capita GDP rate. The reason they have done better is because all their income comes from profits.
We both agree that we have a middle class wage problem. I just don't think the solution should be redistribution (from the rich) or higher prices (tariffs).

No doubt skewed toward the top, but not just the very top has done fine or at least held their own.

What's your solution?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2016, 11:39 AM
 
Location: Ruidoso, NM
5,668 posts, read 6,598,326 times
Reputation: 4817
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
No doubt skewed toward the top, but not just the very top has done fine or at least held their own.

What's your solution?
Why do you believe that? Held their own relative to what? Any demographic that has fallen short of the per capita GDP rise has failed to "hold their own". That's 99.9% of the population. Even professionals and PhDs have not experienced a real income increase at all.





The solution is simple, because the problem is that the value of the US$ has been artificially kept too high. This is what is driving the trade deficit. It's why countries like China are happy to trade goods for US$.

Print money, and hand it out. I'd favor first using it to reduce debt for anyone who has any. Keep handing out money until the US$ value drops enough to close our trade deficit and we have a healthy amount of inflation. Domestic investment and jobs would take off. We can get back on a sustainable growth track.

Of course this would screw up the oligarchs "globalization project" whereby they suck wealth from the US and get wealthier and more powerful. So it won't happen, for the reason it has been happening for the last 40 years. The oligarchs are running this country, and democracy is a sham in the US.

Last edited by rruff; 03-24-2016 at 11:52 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2016, 11:40 AM
 
4,873 posts, read 3,604,595 times
Reputation: 3881
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoonose View Post
We both agree that we have a middle class wage problem. I just don't think the solution should be redistribution (from the rich) or higher prices (tariffs).

No doubt skewed toward the top, but not just the very top has done fine or at least held their own.

What's your solution?
I don't see how you can say that we have tremendous income inequality, and say "well obviously the wealthy have way more money than they deserve, but we could never take money from them and give it to the poor!" I mean, why rule out the only obvious solution to the problem?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2016, 12:29 PM
 
18,805 posts, read 8,479,367 times
Reputation: 4131
Quote:
Originally Posted by rruff View Post
Why do you believe that? Held their own relative to what? Any demographic that has fallen short of the per capita GDP rise has failed to "hold their own". That's 99.9% of the population. Even professionals and PhDs have not experienced a real income increase at all.

The solution is simple, because the problem is that the value of the US$ has been artificially kept too high. This is what is driving the trade deficit. It's why countries like China are happy to trade goods for US$.

Print money, and hand it out. I'd favor first using it to reduce debt for anyone who has any. Keep handing out money until the US$ value drops enough to close our trade deficit and we have a healthy amount of inflation. Domestic investment and jobs would take off. We can get back on a sustainable growth track.

Of course this would screw up the oligarchs "globalization project" whereby they suck wealth from the US and get wealthier and more powerful. So it won't happen, for the reason it has been happening for the last 40 years. The oligarchs are running this country, and democracy is a sham in the US.
OK. The top 10 has manged better. The top 1% might not feel it.

https://aneconomicsense.files.wordpr...2-feb-2015.png

I think that your solution is too draconian and politically impossible. Especially as the bulk of those in need don't believe in printing money.

But I do support other efforts to augment this group. Massive infrastructure spending and jobs. Cheaper HC. Lower middle class and wage related taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:58 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top