Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 01-01-2017, 10:16 AM
 
Location: Vallejo
21,868 posts, read 25,173,926 times
Reputation: 19093

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pvande55 View Post
We did have a depression from 2007-12 (years debatable). One factor keeping it from becoming a Great one was the stimulus effect of war. I say not for a few years.
Sure, there's no definition of depression. Outside of a bad or long-lasting recession, there's just no real consensus on that. The 2008-2009 recession was a bad recession so you could call it a depression. Depression is more a colloquial term and most people have colloquially taken to calling it the Great Recession.

Not sure what my 89-year-old grandmother or four-year-old niece not being in the workforce has to do with anything myself though. I just can't get concerned about them not working. There's been a moderate drop in the 25-54 cohort which is due to a variety of factors including an increase in stay-at-home parents, which again doesn't concern me. I actually think that's a positive sign that there's an increase in families that can support themselves on one income. There's other factors also driving down the 25-54 cohort which aren't as positive though. That said, it's really not that low. We're much, much closer to the ~84% of the late '90s and than the ~68-72% we had during the so-called golden era of the late 50's and '60s.

Last edited by Malloric; 01-01-2017 at 10:25 AM..

 
Old 01-01-2017, 11:54 AM
 
1,766 posts, read 1,224,796 times
Reputation: 2904
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColoGuy View Post
We are living off of debt issued by a large credit card with the name Federal Reserve on it. Very worrisome trends....may have already hit critical mass....beyond the point of no return.

It gets much worse. We have more federal workers than manufacturing workers. Medicare has unfunded liabilities over 50 trillion. Social Security has unfunded liabilities over 30 trillion.

We are drowning in:
Debt
Depression
Petrochemical/Pharmaceutical/Psychotropics
Obesity
Suicides
Divorce
Domestic violence
Crime wave - this time it is law enforcement via civil forfeiture. We gave them a no questions asked carte blanche card to do as they please.
Surveillance
Never ending wars
Incarceration
Drug & alcohol dependence
Denial
Arrogance
Confusion - people used to know which restroom to use
Abortion
Regulations
Lawless government protecting those in power
School shootings - (the shooters take psychotropic medication)
Marriage and the family are under siege...and losing
Unhealthy food saturated with herbicides and GMOs etc.

Few thoughts off the top of my head.
Thank you for your post Cool Guy and Happy New Year. Yes, our system and our way of life is SICK. Our Prisons are full, our mental institutions are full and etc.. There is something terribly wrong with America today and those individuals who are purposely ignoring and denying this fact, protecting status quo and our FED are responsible for the destruction of our country and all this debt that we are leaving to our kids.

We as a nation, we are BROKE, what is so hard to understand about it???? The so called economic recovery is nothing but a lie and illusion. We have been in Depression since 2001 and as soon as interest rates are meaninfully allowed to go up massive defaults and bankruptcies are going to kick in. This economy that is running on cheap money is phony and fake economy engineered by the FED to fool everyone how this recovery is real. It's not real, it's a scam!!!!!!
 
Old 01-01-2017, 05:15 PM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,772,388 times
Reputation: 16993
The FANG stocks have not done well. But they are big stable stocks.

Last edited by NewbieHere; 01-01-2017 at 05:53 PM..
 
Old 01-01-2017, 05:54 PM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,772,388 times
Reputation: 16993
For tech stocks, NVDIA, AMAT, and MU were big winners in 2016, not FANG stocks.
 
Old 01-01-2017, 07:04 PM
 
18,950 posts, read 11,600,412 times
Reputation: 69889
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrkliny View Post
Maybe we need to start reporting these posts to the moderators. It seems that virtually the same post over and over and over again might qualify as trolling. If not it is certainly annoying and kills an hope of real discussion.
Wouldn't that be something?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:26 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top