Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-14-2011, 08:05 AM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,205,940 times
Reputation: 5240

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
This is among many reasons as to why WI wants to recall Walker.



More at:
» Governor, It’s not working! » A United Wisconsin

walker may not be the best there is, but he is tons better than that pig doyle ever was.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-14-2011, 08:08 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,830,486 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
uhm

the tax RATE did NOT increase at all, on the state level..how the LOCALS adjust the rate to the LOCAL school budget is a LOCAL issue...


you are grasping at straws

walker will stay
Many local areas in WI had no choice but to raise property taxes to offset the massive cuts from state funding. So this way those who own a home but have a fixed income (senior citizens), directly pay for these cuts. How does that method work for you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 08:11 AM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,205,940 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Many local areas in WI had no choice but to raise property taxes to offset the massive cuts from state funding. So this way those who own a home but have a fixed income (senior citizens), directly pay for these cuts. How does that method work for you?

strange, our property taxes went down in our county, plus we did not renew any of the levy's that democrats were crying for either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 08:14 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,496,494 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Many local areas in WI had no choice but to raise property taxes to offset the massive cuts from state funding. So this way those who own a home but have a fixed income (senior citizens), pay for these cuts.
wrong

they raised the levies because of the descreasing property values

and the seniors get massive credits off their property taxes (here in NY we call it star)

walker has NOTHING to do with property taxes



Municipal tax rates are based on the total value of all taxable property in each municipality, also known as the tax base. Because local assessors are responsible for determining the property values for their jurisdictions, total assessed value across municipalities and counties is not a uniform measure. To bring all values to a uniform level comparable across jurisdictions, the state equalizes assessed values by using tools such as market sales analysis, random appraisals, and local assessors’ reports. Equalized values, calculated yearly, are meant to reflect fair market value (the most probable selling price).

The tax levy is the amount of money that each taxing jurisdiction (county, municipality, school district, technical college district, tax increment finance district, special district and the state) budgets to receive from property taxes. Levies were decided late in 2010 for 2011 budgets. To calculate the tax rate as a mill rate, each government divides the levy by the total property value (tax base) in its jurisdiction and multiplies the result by 1,000. This calculation allows property tax payments to be distributed evenly among taxpayers according to individual property values.

Because each property taxpayer lives within several taxing jurisdictions, the various tax rates are added together to arrive at the gross tax rate. It is important to note that in this report, when the gross tax rate or levy for a particular county is referenced, it does not refer to the rate or levy attributable to county government in that county, but to the aggregate total of all taxing jurisdictions in the county (including the county government). Also, the net tax rate that determines each taxpayer’s payment differs from the gross rate in that the net rate results from subtracting the state tax credit from the gross tax rate. Taxpayers can determine their individual payment by dividing their property value by 1,000 and multiplying the resulting number by the net tax rate.

With declining property values in the region and state, the only way that local government officials can continue to grow their tax levies is to raise the tax rates. It is not surprising, therefore, that every municipality in southeast Wisconsin had an increase in the gross tax rate from 2010 to 2011. The aggregate gross tax rate in southeast Wisconsin was $21.58 per $1,000 of assessed value, $1.22 higher than in 2010. The aggregate gross tax rate for all municipalities in the state is $20.90 this year.

The annual change in one’s property tax bill reflects not only a change in the property tax rate, but also any change in the assessed value of one’s home. A decrease in the assessed value of one’s home, however, may not translate into a lower tax bill. That is because taxes are determined by applying the tax rate to the assessed value of the home, which means an increased tax rate may outweigh the loss in assessed value and produce a larger tax bill from one year to the next.



as per
http://www.publicpolicyforum.org/pdf...yTaxReport.pdf

In 2011, the region saw only a 1.5% increase in its gross aggregate property tax levy – well below the 10-year average of 4.3% and the lowest annual increase since at least 2000.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 08:20 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,830,486 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
wrong

they raised the levies because of the descreasing property values

and the seniors get massive credits off their property taxes (here in NY we call it star)

walker has NOTHING to do with property taxes



Municipal tax rates are based on the total value of all taxable property in each municipality, also known as the tax base. Because local assessors are responsible for determining the property values for their jurisdictions, total assessed value across municipalities and counties is not a uniform measure. To bring all values to a uniform level comparable across jurisdictions, the state equalizes assessed values by using tools such as market sales analysis, random appraisals, and local assessors’ reports. Equalized values, calculated yearly, are meant to reflect fair market value (the most probable selling price).

The tax levy is the amount of money that each taxing jurisdiction (county, municipality, school district, technical college district, tax increment finance district, special district and the state) budgets to receive from property taxes. Levies were decided late in 2010 for 2011 budgets. To calculate the tax rate as a mill rate, each government divides the levy by the total property value (tax base) in its jurisdiction and multiplies the result by 1,000. This calculation allows property tax payments to be distributed evenly among taxpayers according to individual property values.

Because each property taxpayer lives within several taxing jurisdictions, the various tax rates are added together to arrive at the gross tax rate. It is important to note that in this report, when the gross tax rate or levy for a particular county is referenced, it does not refer to the rate or levy attributable to county government in that county, but to the aggregate total of all taxing jurisdictions in the county (including the county government). Also, the net tax rate that determines each taxpayer’s payment differs from the gross rate in that the net rate results from subtracting the state tax credit from the gross tax rate. Taxpayers can determine their individual payment by dividing their property value by 1,000 and multiplying the resulting number by the net tax rate.

With declining property values in the region and state, the only way that local government officials can continue to grow their tax levies is to raise the tax rates. It is not surprising, therefore, that every municipality in southeast Wisconsin had an increase in the gross tax rate from 2010 to 2011. The aggregate gross tax rate in southeast Wisconsin was $21.58 per $1,000 of assessed value, $1.22 higher than in 2010. The aggregate gross tax rate for all municipalities in the state is $20.90 this year.

The annual change in one’s property tax bill reflects not only a change in the property tax rate, but also any change in the assessed value of one’s home. A decrease in the assessed value of one’s home, however, may not translate into a lower tax bill. That is because taxes are determined by applying the tax rate to the assessed value of the home, which means an increased tax rate may outweigh the loss in assessed value and produce a larger tax bill from one year to the next.



as per
http://www.publicpolicyforum.org/pdf...yTaxReport.pdf

In 2011, the region saw only a 1.5% increase in its gross aggregate property tax levy – well below the 10-year average of 4.3% and the lowest annual increase since at least 2000.
Let me get this straight. In Walkers's kingdom, property values went down however, the rate went up. Most people I know in WI will be paying in more actual dollars even though their property value went down. Nice!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 08:21 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,496,494 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Let me get this straight. In Walkers's kingdom, property values went down however, the rate went up. Most people I know in WI will be paying in more actual dollars even though their property value went down. Nice!
again..has NOTHING to due with walker

again you are proved to be a troll
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 08:25 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,830,486 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
again..has NOTHING to due with walker

again you are proved to be a troll
Did you read the white paper of the link you gave? Let me pull a direct quote from it for you:

Quote:
The aggregate school district tax levy increased 2.3%, making it the main driver of the increase in the region’s gross tax levy.
http://www.publicpolicyforum.org/pdf...yTaxReport.pdf



Now who cut state funding to schools in WI over 1 billion dollars?

I'll help you again with the answer:
Quote:
Wis. Gov. signs budget cutting education $1.85B
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/...20074509.shtml
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 08:31 AM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,830,486 times
Reputation: 10789
The Capitol is not Walker’s private palace!

Walker acted as if he were king of the Capitol and tried to restrict the rights of others.

Quote:
The courts will, ultimately, reject Gov. Scott Walker’s latest attempt to stifle dissent: a scheme to require permits, charge fees and otherwise limit access to the Capitol by those who do not happen to be paid lobbyists.
But the problem of this governor, or any governor, treating the Capitol as his or her private palace needs to be addressed.

Read more: The Capitol is not Walker
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 08:39 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,496,494 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Did you read the white paper of the link you gave? Let me pull a direct quote from it for you:


http://www.publicpolicyforum.org/pdf...yTaxReport.pdf



Now who cut state funding to schools in WI over 1 billion dollars?

I'll help you again with the answer:

Wis. Gov. signs budget cutting education $1.85B - CBS News
yes I did read it..even posted many para's from it

did you read ALL of it??????

did you even UNDERSTAND what you posted

the SCHOOL levy (which included the INCREASE of PENSIONS and saleries for SCHOOL personell) was the main driver behind the regions increase in tax levy

Quote:
With declining property values in the region and state, the only way that local government officials can continue to grow their tax levies is to raise the tax rates. It is not surprising, therefore, that every municipality in southeast Wisconsin had an increase in the gross tax rate from 2010 to 2011.
In 2011, the region saw only a 1.5% increase in its gross aggregate property tax levy – well below the 10-year average of 4.3% and the lowest annual increase since at least 2000.

we have been cutting funding FROM THE STATE here too,,,YOUR (district) schools are not STATE schools and should be funded by the DISTRICT

walker is doing a good job

to bad YOU (jojajn) have to start a BOO-HOO TROLL thread just because you dont like a republican who is doing a good job

you sir are a troll,
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-14-2011, 08:44 AM
LML
 
Location: Wisconsin
7,100 posts, read 9,114,142 times
Reputation: 5191
[quote=workingclasshero;22114465]wrong

they raised the levies because of the descreasing property values

and the seniors get massive credits off their property taxes (here in NY we call it star)
walker has NOTHING to do with property taxes




WRONG!!!!! I don't know what they do in NY......just as you clearly have no idea what we actually do here in WI.....but seniors do NOT get credits...massive or otherwise....off our property taxes. I am a senior and believe me, I would know if there were any credits available on my property taxes.

Thanks to Walker, I'll be paying more for less. Our small city had to lay off 20 police and firefighters. We had to lay off dozens of teachers and teachers aides that helped handicapped students. We had to lay off public works personnel that clear the snow and pick up trash. And of course the loss of those jobs has impacted us through the loss of the service they provided as well as the loss of their buying power.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top