Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ah yes this guy thinks that because Walker won democracy is over for the US of A. He sounds like he may be one of those who talked about killing Walker in those gently tweets the other night.
Beck here compares this guy's performance to the man who got to announce the crash and destruction of the Hindenburg. Both talked about the inhumanity of it all. If you can't stand Beck get out of this one now.
Ah yes this guy thinks that because Walker won democracy is over for the US of A. He sounds like he may be one of those who talked about killing Walker in those gently tweets the other night.
Beck here compares this guy's performance to the man who got to announce the crash and destruction of the Hindenburg. Both talked about the inhumanity of it all. If you can't stand Beck get out of this one now.
Miss the point much? Here's why he said the "end of democracy" - because Walker had 3 billionaires and big, big outside money behind him. Bought and paid for! Now what do these wealthy backers expect in return, a balanced Wisconsin budget? Right...
Question then: why do you on the Right support this system? Could it be that you (historically like others) don't like the lower-class vote - democracy itself? Many people throughout history have believed that only the upper classes should vote - the better for them of course.
This is what the "end of democracy" is all about, and has been in the works for decades.
Miss the point much? Here's why he said the "end of democracy" - because Walker had 3 billionaires and big, big outside money behind him. Bought and paid for! Now what do these wealthy backers expect in return, a balanced Wisconsin budget? Right...
Question then: why do you on the Right support this system? Could it be that you (historically like others) don't like the lower-class vote - democracy itself? Many people throughout history have believed that only the upper classes should vote - the better for them of course.
This is what the "end of democracy" is all about, and has been in the works for decades.
I support any system that eliminates the Scourge of America, also known as the Democratic Party. Since their inception they have been the party of bigots and hatred, with only one objective - destroy the US by any means.
They failed during the Civil War, so now they are trying to destroy the US economically. Patriotic Americans will not allow that to happen.
The US is a constitutional republic. If you want a democracy you will have to go to ... oh wait, there are no democracies anywhere on the planet. Well, I guess you are just SOL.
I support any system that eliminates the Scourge of America, also known as the Democratic Party. Since their inception they have been the party of bigots and hatred, with only one objective - destroy the US by any means.
They failed during the Civil War, so now they are trying to destroy the US economically. Patriotic Americans will not allow that to happen.
The US is a constitutional republic. If you want a democracy you will have to go to ... oh wait, there are no democracies anywhere on the planet. Well, I guess you are just SOL.
Listen to Fox much?
Check up on your history. The Dems were the party of slavery and oppression at one time then switched places with the repubs who are now the corporate fascist party. And you favor them? The fascist mentality never dies - and it can happen here.
Actually, not at all. I have not watched any TV, except for DVDs, since August 2006.
Quote:
Originally Posted by detwahDJ
Check up on your history. The Dems were the party of slavery and oppression at one time then switched places with the repubs who are now the corporate fascist party. And you favor them? The fascist mentality never dies - and it can happen here.
Democrats are still the party of slavery, which is why they continue to support Affirmative Action and keeping minorities down on the "plantation" with their socialist welfare. With regard to fascism, it was not the Republican Party that mandated health insurance for everyone or be subject to a fine. It was not the Republican Party that created an off-shore oil moratorium by fiat.
The Democrat Party have been fascists since their inception. Which is why those who did not join Andrew Jackson's Democratic Party called themselves "Whigs," to mock the fascist in the White House.
Actually, not at all. I have not watched any TV, except for DVDs, since August 2006.
Democrats are still the party of slavery, which is why they continue to support Affirmative Action and keeping minorities down on the "plantation" with their socialist welfare. With regard to fascism, it was not the Republican Party that mandated health insurance for everyone or be subject to a fine. It was not the Republican Party that created an off-shore oil moratorium by fiat.
The Democrat Party have been fascists since their inception. Which is why those who did not join Andrew Jackson's Democratic Party called themselves "Whigs," to mock the fascist in the White House.
I use Fox as a catch-all for fascist media, so you're listening to someone, since you use the term "Democrat Party". Nobody gets their news and information from DVDs.
Like I said in another post, conservatives such as yourself are not against "socialist welfare" if you approve of the recipient.
I use Fox as a catch-all for fascist media, so you're listening to someone, since you use the term "Democrat Party". Nobody gets their news and information from DVDs.
Like I said in another post, conservatives such as yourself are not against "socialist welfare" if you approve of the recipient.
I am against all forms of federal welfare, regardless of the recipient. That was not a power granted to the federal government by the US Constitution, nor did the US Constitution prohibit the States from enacted socialist welfare programs. Therefore, the power to create socialist welfare programs lies solely with the States, not the federal government.
And yet, many of the people that are attacked as racist because they don't support Obama's liberal policies, do support and would be happy to vote for, Allen West. Whenever the left can't win an arguement, a great many toss out the "wacism" card as if it's a valid arguement.
With Obama, the issue isn't his race. It's his utter lack of leadership ability, poor handling of the economy and corruption and incompetence within his administration that has distressed so many people.
* Obama doesn't "handle" the economy. An obstructionist Congress does.
* "Incompetence" - inability to overcome obstructionist repubs (just exactly what you want so you are not "distressed" at all). Keep it up, some of us are on to you.
* Obama's "liberal policies", like retaining the Bush tax cuts?
BUT, winding down the Republican wars, equal rights for minorities, women, and gays, killing off Bin Laden and his followers, calling attention to corporate crooks. Yes, one can see why you hate him.
The more I think about this, the more I realize the part in bold is one of the main reasons the union when nuts in WI.
Did you notice how the union was quick to tell teachers to tighten the belt and agree to help pay into their health insurance and retirement pension. Yet the union refused to budge on losing the overcharging monopoly on selling health insurance coverage.
Where are the true interests of the union? Certainly not with the teachers, but rather with their big greedy corporate insurance coverage monopoly overcharging individual school districts several hundreds of thousands of dollars per year above fair market value.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.