Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 10-16-2012, 01:26 PM
 
Location: Too far from home.
8,732 posts, read 6,784,658 times
Reputation: 2374

Advertisements

IMO, given the choices, there is no right choice. One is as bad as the other.

 
Old 10-16-2012, 01:30 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,113 posts, read 34,739,914 times
Reputation: 15093
Romney can't even win his home state.

Jack Kennedy won Massachusetts.

Lyndon Johnson won Texas.

Richard Nixon won California.

Gerald Ford won Michigan.

Jimmy Carter won Georgia.

Reagan won California.

Big Bush won Texas.

Clinton won Arkansas.

Little Bush won Texas.

Obama won Illinois (and is winning Illinois).

We rejected Romney in Massachusetts. The nation should take heed.
 
Old 10-16-2012, 01:30 PM
 
Location: in a cabin overlooking the mountains
3,078 posts, read 4,376,792 times
Reputation: 2276
Romney was worse than useless for the Bay State. He saw his governorship there as a stepping stone to running for POTUS, nothing more.

The only thing he accomplished that was noteworthy was the universal healthcare bill and that was because of Ted Kennedy.

Other than that?

Quote:
Romney clearly did not relish having to work with a Legislature that was 85 percent Democratic. He pushed hard during his first two years as governor to boost the number of Republicans on Beacon Hill. But that effort was a failure; Republicans ended up losing seats in the midterm elections.

Romney gave up on party building. "From now on," he told The Boston Globe, "it's me-me-me."
...
Romney issued some 800 vetoes, and the Legislature overrode nearly all of them, sometimes unanimously.
Romney As Governor: 800 Vetoes And One Big Deal : NPR
 
Old 10-16-2012, 01:31 PM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,717,580 times
Reputation: 853
Massachusetts’ national ranking leapt from the 29th highest in unemployment when Romney took office to the 18th by the end of his term.

Unemployment in Massachusetts rose during Romney’s first year from a rate of 5.6 percent in January 2003, when he took office, to a peak of 6.0 percent in mid 2003.[66] It then steadily declined over the remainder of his term, ending at 4.6 percent in January 2007.

When he took office in early 2003, the nation as a whole was still suffering the effects of the early 2000s recession. Massachusetts was losing manufacturing jobs, and, with an economy heavily dependent on the technology sector, had been badly shaken by the dot-com bubble collapse.
 
Old 10-16-2012, 01:34 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,349,276 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
Romney couldn't turn the economy around in Massachusetts when 46 other states were thriving. Even Post-Katrina Louisiana was able to spur more job growth than Massachusetts.

Romney is also losing Massachusetts badly. No wonder. His economic policies made Mass one of the weakest states on job creation.

Election 2012: Massachusetts President - Rasmussen Reports™

Romney hasn't told America that he looked at polling in 2006 and saw that he was down 16 points to his opponent. Instead of even attempting to correct all of the damage he caused, he decided not to run and then threw Mass under the bus.

This Vietnam dodging, job-killing, non-Christian, flip flopping coward is the WRONG choice for America.
The country was emerging from a recession when Romney took office. Remember that little thing called the dot com bubble? Massachusetts was crushed by that and those jobs were never expected to come back. Who cares about facts though when you can have talking points......
 
Old 10-16-2012, 01:36 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,113 posts, read 34,739,914 times
Reputation: 15093
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrugalYankee View Post
Romney was worse than useless for the Bay State. He saw his governorship there as a stepping stone to running for POTUS, nothing more.

The only thing he accomplished that was noteworthy was the universal healthcare bill and that was because of Ted Kennedy.

Other than that?


Romney As Governor: 800 Vetoes And One Big Deal : NPR
He was absolutely awful! Massachusettsans know the real Mitt Romney for the failure that he truly is.
 
Old 10-16-2012, 01:36 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,349,276 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucknow View Post
That's a load of BS!!!! Obama has been obstructed every single inch of the way as a leader. The GOP are world class TRAITORS in this regard. They care far more about trying to bring the president down than they care about the good of their country. It's just so obvious even a blind person can see it. Policies the GOP was always in favour of are all of a sudden so wrong that they vote 100% against. I have less than zero respect for these idiots. They really should start using the slogan that all right wing Europeans used before WW2. "Class before country". That fits the GOP to a T.
Senate rejects Obama budget in 99-0 vote - The Hill's Floor Action

Those darn obstructionists. Which party had a majority in both chambers for Obama's first two years anyway? Can you remind me? What did Obama spend that time focusing on? Was it the most important issue- the economy?
 
Old 10-16-2012, 01:36 PM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,717,580 times
Reputation: 853
BajanYankee also seems to be a rather huge BIGOT....

"non-Christian" ????

Real nice Mr Liberal Tolerance.
 
Old 10-16-2012, 01:40 PM
 
46,302 posts, read 27,117,053 times
Reputation: 11133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
Senate rejects Obama budget in 99-0 vote - The Hill's Floor Action

Those darn obstructionists. Which party had a majority in both chambers for Obama's first two years anyway? Can you remind me? What did Obama spend that time focusing on? Was it the most important issue- the economy?
Yep, and you know dirty harry brought every single vote, to a vote....
 
Old 10-16-2012, 01:41 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,113 posts, read 34,739,914 times
Reputation: 15093
Here's the truth for all of the people who have never set foot in Massachusetts.

Romney Stifled Start-Up Creation in Massachusetts and Would Do the Same as President; Romney Economics Didn

Quote:
So, why didn’t Mitt Romney run for a second term as governor of Massachusetts?

He would have lost. And, not just lost by a little. He would have been creamed.

Romney won his first term with about 49% of the vote. After 4 years in office he had a 30% approval rating–30%.

You can’t blame this on Romney being a Republican. Massachusetts, when it comes to electing governors, is friendly to Republicans. For 16 straight years Massachusetts elected nothing but Republican governors (Weld, Cellucci, Swift, and Romney).

Yet, it only took one Romney term to destroy this Republican popularity streak.
Exposed!

Why Didn't Mitt Romney Run For A Second Term As Governor Of Massachusetts? - CNN iReport
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top