Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-02-2016, 01:42 AM
 
10,829 posts, read 5,453,328 times
Reputation: 4710

Advertisements

I'm not going to read through all 42 pages of this thread.

Here's my take:

On the Republican side, the result was what most expected. Cruz won because Iowa has a lot of evangelicals. Trump pulled off a very good second place. Rubio came in third.

Rubio's speech was a victory speech through and through. Hey, Marco. Sorry to break it to you, but you came in third. That's very good -- but you didn't win.

When Trump was about to make his speech, Anderson Cooper on CNN indicated that he expected Trump to be a sore loser -- or at least raised that possibility.

Trump's speech was gracious, short, and filled with thanks to his supporters in Iowa. He congratulated Cruz, and then expressed appropriate optimism about his chances in New Hampshire, South Carolina, etc.

Cruz's victory speech went on and on and on.

On the Democrat side, Bernie pulled off a spectacular coup against Hillary. You have to give him credit for that. And his speech was very good and just the right length.

Hillary's speech was good. She was smart enough not to claim victory. Whether she'll win in the final tally is still unkown to me.

Anyway, this is all just the beginning. Iowa can give candidates momentum, but in recent years it has rarely decided who wins the White House.

 
Old 02-02-2016, 01:44 AM
 
9,418 posts, read 13,528,454 times
Reputation: 10310
Quote:
Originally Posted by Regina14 View Post
Clinton is winning by apparently 3 or 4 votes? Shouldn't they do a recount? Why did less than 2000 people vote for the Democrat candidates in this caucus, or is that normal?
What?
 
Old 02-02-2016, 01:47 AM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,717,565 times
Reputation: 7943
Hillary has won. Called by NBC News.
 
Old 02-02-2016, 01:47 AM
 
9,418 posts, read 13,528,454 times
Reputation: 10310
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasLawyer2000 View Post
A recount of what? This isn't a voting process...
And 3 or 4 votes? Does the OP mean the close percentage between the candidates? I'm baffled.
 
Old 02-02-2016, 01:49 AM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,988,615 times
Reputation: 6059
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Hillary has won. Called by NBC News.
By toss of 5 coins. I hope she is proud of that "win".
 
Old 02-02-2016, 01:58 AM
 
11,181 posts, read 10,558,415 times
Reputation: 18618
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Hillary has won. Called by NBC News.
Sanders supporters need time to process that. As someone who was convinced McGovern could win, I understand. Good on them, for caring enough to vote.
 
Old 02-02-2016, 02:00 AM
 
Location: north central Ohio
8,665 posts, read 5,865,051 times
Reputation: 5201
Quote:
Originally Posted by waviking24 View Post
Trump is one of those leeches. Just wait and see what happens next. Cruz will crash and the GOP will do everything it can to ensure Rubio crushes Trump.

I'm hoping for a Bernie win, but I'd be ok with Rubio trouncing that loudmouth Trump!


Anyone but Trump or Hillary!
 
Old 02-02-2016, 02:01 AM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,988,615 times
Reputation: 6059
This will energize the Sanders supporters even more. "Winning" by 5 coin tosses is absurdity in 2016. Donations are literally pouring in for the Sanders campaign now. And no one is maxed out at $2700. We are fighting an Al Smith vs FDR battle here. The establishment vs the visionary. "No, we can't" vs "Yes, we can".
 
Old 02-02-2016, 02:19 AM
 
11,181 posts, read 10,558,415 times
Reputation: 18618
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
"Winning" by 5 coin tosses is absurdity in 2016.
It's all over but the whining. But I'm 1000% on your side that Bernie remains a viable candidate going into the convention, and I'm happy the Iowa race deemed him a competitor. HRC needs a strong contender and the Dem party needs an opposing voice. Go Hill, Go Bernie.
 
Old 02-02-2016, 02:33 AM
 
11,181 posts, read 10,558,415 times
Reputation: 18618
To keep things in perspective: there was not one single minute tonight in which Sanders was in the lead.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top