Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-13-2016, 09:56 AM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,196 posts, read 19,481,704 times
Reputation: 5306

Advertisements

There is a bit of confusion on this hole thing. Some genuine not totally understanding it and others just shouting crap to cause confusion.


1. Both sides have unpledged delegates. The Democrats call them Super Delegates, but the GOP has something similar.

2. For the Democrats the Super Delegates make up 14.9% of the overall Delegates, on the GOP side it is 6.25%. It use to be higher on the GOP side, but they have recently started to bind some of their party leader delegates to the vote of the Primary and Caucus. This decision is done by state party leadership and can vary state by state, they just did that with New Hampshire.

3. Republican unpledged delegates do not announce their support until the Convention, Democratic Super Delegates can announce their support prior to the Convention. However, they are not bound to the candidate they say they support until they actually vote for them at the Covention, so they really aren't "pledged" at that point. Super Delegates can and have switched.

4. The Unpledged or superDelegates have NEVER overrode the Primary and Caucus results. They have always gone to the candidate who received the maority of the Delegates tied to the Primary and Caucus results.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-13-2016, 10:10 AM
 
Location: US
3,091 posts, read 3,969,964 times
Reputation: 1648
Here's an article on the good news and bad news for Bernie Sanders from FiveThirtyEight.

Superdelegates Might Not Save Hillary Clinton | FiveThirtyEight

"If you’re a Sanders supporter, you might think this seems profoundly unfair. And you’d be right: It’s profoundly unfair. Superdelegates were created in part to give Democratic party elites the opportunity to put their finger on the scale and prevent nominations like those of George McGovern in 1972 or Jimmy Carter in 1976, which displeased party insiders."


The Republican superdelegates do not have the freedom to vote for whichever candidate they want. The Republican party ruled in 2015 that their superdelegates, unlike Democrats, must vote for the candidate that their state voted for.

Bustle
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2016, 10:18 AM
 
2,973 posts, read 1,977,970 times
Reputation: 1080
Bernie Sanders' fans can start whining when he gets at least half of 17.9 million votes that Hillary got in 2008.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2016, 10:28 AM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,196 posts, read 19,481,704 times
Reputation: 5306
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daywalk View Post
Bernie Sanders' fans can start whining when he gets at least half of 17.9 million votes that Hillary got in 2008.
There are some potential issues with the Superdelegates that do merit a bit of a discussion. With that being said, it really isn't the Bernie supporters who are doing the whining. Look at the posting history of those who are starting pretty much all of these threads. They are primarily Trump supporters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2016, 10:43 AM
 
11,181 posts, read 10,541,960 times
Reputation: 18618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
With that being said, it really isn't the Bernie supporters who are doing the whining. Look at the posting history of those who are starting pretty much all of these threads. They are primarily Trump supporters.
OP is a Cruz supporter who considers Clinton a bigger threat than Bernie to his candidate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2016, 10:46 AM
 
Location: Fredericktown,Ohio
7,168 posts, read 5,370,836 times
Reputation: 2922
Hmmm wonder why super delegates exist? Could Debbie Wasseman- Shultz let the cat out of the bag when she said this

superdelegates “exist... to make sure that party leaders and elected officials don’t have to be in a position where they are running against grassroots activists."

So in a nut shell it exist for the establishment and their chosen ones to hold onto power and fend off the anti establishment and their grass roots support.

With that said if Sanders and Clinton run all through the 50 states and Sanders is only ahead by 75 delegates what do you think will happen? Keep in mind it is rumored that Clinton has over 300 super delegates in the bag.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2016, 11:03 AM
 
11,181 posts, read 10,541,960 times
Reputation: 18618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swingblade View Post
With that said if Sanders and Clinton run all through the 50 states and Sanders is only ahead by 75 delegates what do you think will happen? Keep in mind it is rumored that Clinton has over 300 super delegates in the bag.
75 delegates is about 1.5%. The DNC may or may not see that as enough of an edge to deem Sanders electable in the general election. If the margin is that narrow, it will probably hinge on who has the strongest momentum going into the convention.
The one thing I can guarantee you is they will nominate the candidate they think has the best chance of winning the election. They favor Clinton because of her long years of loyalty and hard work for the party and its candidates. But they'll dump her in a heartbeat if they think Sanders has the best chance of winning the general. They're keeping their eye on the prize.

I'm not sure the same applies to the GOP. Electability doesn't seem high on their list of desirable candidate qualifications. We'll see.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2016, 11:25 AM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,664,682 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by biscuitmom View Post
DNC super delegates, like RNC party leaders, are unpledged. Like the RNC party leaders, they can endorse. Unlike the RNC supporters, they can vote for whomever they please or can choose to abstain on the first ballot. But there will be only one ballot.
Nope. Go read the rules on the RNC site. That opinion article that you keep posting has it wrong. RNC has nothing like the DNC "Superdelegates".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2016, 11:31 AM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,664,682 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post

4. The Unpledged or superDelegates have NEVER overrode the Primary and Caucus results. They have always gone to the candidate who received the maority of the Delegates tied to the Primary and Caucus results.
Yes they did. Hillary Clinton won the popular vote in 2008. But when the Congressional Black Caucus pulled their support from Hillary and gave it to Obama, Obama got the nomination.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2016, 11:35 AM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,196 posts, read 19,481,704 times
Reputation: 5306
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Yes they did. Hillary Clinton won the popular vote in 2008. But when the Congressional Black Caucus pulled their support from Hillary and gave it to Obama, Obama got the nomination.
Not exactly. Using just the popular vote is missing a bunch of pieces for starters because only Clinton's named remained on the Michigan ballot after they had their delegates stripped initially from moving their Primary up. Secondly, the way the Caucus votes were tallied are a bit different than the Primary votes. Obama received more delegates than Clinton from the results tied directly to the Caucus and Primary results. The Superdelegates did break toward Obama, but they broke towards the candidate who received the most delegates frorm the votes tied directly to the Caucus and Primary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top