Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
HRC is going to lose California--and after her pledged delegate count, won't have the threshold number for nomination even with her Democratic Socialist Party's proletariat Delegates of the People.
"Hillary Clinton still leads the Vermont senator in the state, 47 percent to 41 percent with 12 percent undecided, but the former secretary of state has seen only a modest, 1-point uptick since the last survey was conducted in January. Sanders, meanwhile, has jumped 6 percentage points."
HRC is going to lose California--and after her pledged delegate count, won't have the threshold number for nomination even with her Democratic Socialist Party's proletariat Delegates of the People.
[url=http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/04/bernie-sanders-california-primary-poll-221711]Poll: Sanders surges in California - POLITICO[/url]
"Hillary Clinton still leads the Vermont senator in the state, 47 percent to 41 percent with 12 percent undecided, but the former secretary of state has seen only a modest, 1-point uptick since the last survey was conducted in January. Sanders, meanwhile, has jumped 6 percentage points."
So where does it say she's going to lose the state?
I think it's a little early to be talking about California at this point. We keep hearing about all the "momentum" and "enthusiasm" but let's wait until the numbers show he's gaining. I realize there's not too much to talk about until the New York debate, but polls months before an election aren't very reliable.
So where does it say she's going to lose the state?
I think it's a little early to be talking about California at this point. We keep hearing about all the "momentum" and "enthusiasm" but let's wait until the numbers show he's gaining. I realize there's not too much to talk about until the New York debate, but polls months before an election aren't very reliable.
Like PPP, Field is a respected outfit. Polls are just the argumentative brace; the undercurrents on the West Coast aren't conducive to Clinton over Sanders this year.
And she's going to lose Wyoming later this evening.
Why is it that Trump supporters always criticize Hillary Clinton?
Anyway, let's see what happens in New York and in the April 26 primaries. Although Sanders can't catch up (do the math) it would be embarrassing if Clinton lost a state in which she served as Senator, so that might create some big changes. I just don't see that happening. I think it will be very close, however. So far, she's still holding on to a strong lead.
Regarding the poll, I didn't say it was unreliable. However, I've been following the polls on FiveThirtyEight and RealClearPolitics and they all show Hillary is ahead by several points in Calif. They just don't carry too much weight right now. Again, what happens in New York might change that but, for now, she's very far ahead. There are a lot of states between now and June and I'm confident Clinton will fare well in Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware and Connecticut.
Wyoming is a no-brainer. I could have told you Sanders was going to win Wyoming as soon as he announced his candidacy. He does exceptionally well in caucus states. However, even if he wins all 14 delegates, it won't make much of a dent in Clinton's lead at this point.
Why is it that Trump supporters always criticize Hillary Clinton?
Anyway, let's see what happens in New York and in the April 26 primaries. Although Sanders can't catch up (do the math) it would be embarrassing if Clinton lost a state in which she served as Senator, so that might create some big changes. I just don't see that happening. I think it will be very close, however. So far, she's still holding on to a strong lead.
Regarding the poll, I didn't say it was unreliable. However, I've been following the polls on FiveThirtyEight and RealClearPolitics and they all show Hillary is ahead by several points in Calif. They just don't carry too much weight right now. Again, what happens in New York might change that but, for now, she's very far ahead. There are a lot of states between now and June and I'm confident Clinton will fare well in Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware and Connecticut.
Wyoming is a no-brainer. I could have told you Sanders was going to win Wyoming as soon as he announced his candidacy. He does exceptionally well in caucus states. However, even if he wins all 14 delegates, it won't make much of a dent in Clinton's lead at this point.
Sanders takes Wyoming, Indiana, Guam, West Virginia, Oregon, Montana, New Jersey, North Dakota, South Dakota, New York, and California.
Some people are so obsessed with the word "free" that they miss everything else Sanders said.
You'll all be equal as serfs on a collective farm.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
