Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes, because she was behind Obama in pledged delegates. Right now Sanders is behind Clinton in pledged delegates. It will be very hard for him to overcome her pledged delegate lead and without that, I think the SD's will stand unified behind Clinton.
Unlike their Republican counterparts, the delegates will respect the will of the people. Then again, that's a bit easier for them as their favorite is almost certainly going to be the winner of the popular vote and the one with the most pledged delegates.
Because the Dems have the Super Delegates. They will easily put Clinton over the magic number, if she is able to maintain a lead in the pledged delegates.
No, they won't. Not even with the super People's Delegates of the Proletariat included that the Democratic Socialist Party plenary gave her, she won't meet the threshold.
No, they won't. Not even with the super People's Delegates of the Proletariat included that the Democratic Socialist Party plenary gave her, she won't meet the threshold.
Super delegates aside, Hillary has a 1756 to 1068 edge and will easily take New York and California. After those two states, she'll have around 2000. Bernie's only chance is if Hillary is indicted.
I've been waiting for someone on City-Data to start this thread
[URL="http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/275634-poll-sanders-closes-gap-in-ny"]SANDERS CLOSES GAP IN NEW YORK[/URL]
But this is what it really says in the article.
"Clinton leads among likely Democratic primary voters 56 percent to 38 percent in the survey. When the same poll was conducted in March, Sanders trailed the former New York senator in her home state by 48 points."
Clearly, the pro-Sanders article wants to excite his supporters. Unfortunately, a large majority of people only see headlines and do not read the articles or pay attention to the facts.
That is the most schizophrenic political position of the century and one that is simply incomprehensible to me. If a voter supports Trump, fine, it a voter supports Sanders that is fine as well, but to support the two antithetical candidates is not only illogical it is pure political lunacy.
I'm voting for Sanders but I hope Trump wins the GOP nomination. There is nothing schizophrenic there at all. There are very little differences in Clinton, Cruz, Kasich, Ryan, etc.
In the end Trump *might* be the same but we know for certain the others are. Wall Street and War 24/7.
I guess you need to ask the 18 million people who voted for her in 2008 and the more than 9.3 million who have voted for her in this primary to date.
I've asked some....the majority are voting for her on the plumbing issue. Makes no sense to me. She's been awful in leadership in the past, constantly lies, is never open about anything, against the biggest issues the left claims to be for but she sits down when she pee's.
"Clinton leads among likely Democratic primary voters 56 percent to 38 percent in the survey. When the same poll was conducted in March, Sanders trailed the former New York senator in her home state by 48 points."
Clearly, the pro-Sanders article wants to excite his supporters. Unfortunately, a large majority of people only see headlines and do not read the articles or pay attention to the facts.
It's not her home state. It was the only state she could get elected in so she moved there.
I'm voting for Sanders but I hope Trump wins the GOP nomination. There is nothing schizophrenic there at all. There are very little differences in Clinton, Cruz, Kasich, Ryan, etc.
In the end Trump *might* be the same but we know for certain the others are. Wall Street and War 24/7.
Then explain Cruz's 'No' votes on the National Defense Authorization Act.
I'm voting for Sanders but I hope Trump wins the GOP nomination. There is nothing schizophrenic there at all. There are very little differences in Clinton, Cruz, Kasich, Ryan, etc.
In the end Trump *might* be the same but we know for certain the others are. Wall Street and War 24/7.
I totally disagree with your logic. Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton are much closer in ideologies than Bernie Sanders is to Donald Trump or any Republican. In fact, Bernie Sanders said in a recent interview he thinks Obama's nominee for SCOTUS is much too conservative.
So, do you honestly believe Donald Trump or any Republican would nominate a liberal leaning justice? I realize they're all supposed to be neutral when it comes to Constitutional Law, but a Sanders supporter voting for Trump makes no sense at all to me. It would clearly be out of spite, not principle.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
