Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Need to know how many people get guns through Charleston loophole broken
down by timeframe. The last thing he said he would look at something it
took a very long time.
#1: This is for information. It doesn't necessarily warrant constant responses.
#2: I notice that most Hillary supporters are too scared to make comments. Some tried and got smacked down by their own ignorance.
#3: Do you have those other people on ignore? What's that right above your own post?
#4: The only people "tired" of the emails are Hillary supporters who want to pretend that she's not a corrupt lying beast. The fact that you continue to support a traitor who knew that Saudi was supporting ISIS, and Saudi supported her, as well, via her Clinton Foundation, is sickening. You Beast supporters can keep trying to shut down the truth, but you're not going to prevail. I will not stop posting. If that makes you so upset that you want to come here and soil yourself in front of everyone, you should probably find another thread to participate in...such as "Pop Up Books for Grown Ups...Help With Reading Comprehension The EZ Way."
Keep it up everywhere you can TWIS, many people are wayyyy to lazy to bother looking up information that might give them some insight about who they are championing.
Sadly, all many are interested in is sound bites that pop on between Dancing with the Stars episodes, the latest dirty antics on Big Brother or who's nailing who on The Batchelor/ette.
The fact that you are getting almost no response should tell you something. Post after post after post, and the best you can muster is one or two like-minded cult members chiming in once every three our four pages.
But go ahead and continue to believe many people are reading your unending posts, but are simply too in awe of them to be able to muster up a response. If Trump supporters excel at one thing, it is the ability to believe as many as six impossible things before breakfast.
Again, the very fact that you're here harassing me about something that you stated doesn't interest you shows me that you are desperate, along with other Beast supporters, to stop the truth from coming out. If this thread causes you the vapors, go visit another thread. I will continue to post as long as those emails get leaked. That IS the topic. The topic is NOT: Why HeyJude cries at every email release.
Keep it up everywhere you can TWIS, many people are wayyyy to lazy to bother looking up information that might give them some insight about who they are championing.
Sadly, all many are interested in is sound bites that pop on between Dancing with the Stars episodes, the latest dirty antics on Big Brother or who's nailing who on The Batchelor/ette.
Looking at them is overwhelming, so having them filtered through and broken down brings out information that people want to know, despite what Beast supporters say. CNN not reporting it does not mean that these emails are not being talked about all. over. the. internet. Much to the dismay of some of the....naysayers.
This is a rare view inside OUR political system like we've never seen before. Why anyone would not take advantage of this RARE opportunity to see what OUR elected officials are really talking about and how warped this has become is beyond me.
How many times have people said "I'd like to be a fly on the wall in that room"? Well, HERE'S YOUR CHANCE TO BE THAT FLY.
USE IT!
Here is what gets me, the Dems are worried about the wealthy getting tax breaks with Donald Trump's proposed tax plan, yet if Hillary Clinton wins the country will the be run by all of her rich "pay to play" friends who have supported her campaign and donated large sums of money to the Clinton Foundation. Hillary will tell you what you want to hear, but she will not be able to act on her promises, because is owned by wealthy donors and Wall Street. She will do nothing for the middle class, please think carefully before voting for this two-faced puppet.
There have been a couple stories in the last few days about past HRC
positions on gun control, like this one in Buzzfeed about HRC OPPOSING
federal gun control standards and arguing (as on minimum wage now) that
states had different needs.
I also saw something about her supporting a 25% tax on gun sales back in
1993.
I didn't see q and a on either of these in the briefing.
*Mandy Grunwald*
*Grunwald Communications*
*202 973-9400*
-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Fallon <bfallon@hillaryclinton.com>
To: John Anzalone <john@algpolling.com>
Cc: Kate Offerdahl <kofferdahl@hillaryclinton.com>; Amanda Renteria < arenteria@hillaryclinton.com>; caitlin <caitlin@grunwald-communications.com>;
Christina Reynolds <creynolds@hillaryclinton.com>; Dan Schwerin < dschwerin@hillaryclinton.com>; David Binder <david@db-research.com>; Ellen
Esterhay <ellen.esterhay@gmmb.com>; Huma Abedin <ha16@hillaryclinton.com>;
Jake Sullivan <jsullivan@hillaryclinton.com>; Jennifer Palmieri < jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com>; Jim Margolis <Jim.Margolis@gmmb.com>; Joel
Benenson <jbenenson@bsgco.com>; John Podesta <jp66@hillaryclinton.com>;
John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com>; Karen Finney < kfinney@hillaryclinton.com>; Kristina Schake <kschake@hillaryclinton.com>;
Mandy Grunwald <gruncom@aol.com>; Marlon Marshall < mmarshall@hillaryclinton.com>; Maya Harris <mharris@hillaryclinton.com>;
Mike Vlacich <mvlacich@hillaryclinton.com>; Milia Fisher < mfisher@hillaryclinton.com>; Mona Thinavongsa <Mona@algpolling.com>; Oren
Shur <oshur@hillaryclinton.com>; Robby Mook <re47@hillaryclinton.com>; Sara
Latham <slatham@hillaryclinton.com>; Sawsan Bay <sbay@hillaryclinton.com>;
Shannon Currie <scurrie@bsgco.com>; Teddy Goff <tgoff@hillaryclinton.com>;
Tony Carrk <tcarrk@hillaryclinton.com>; Varun Anand < vanand@hillaryclinton.com>; Heather Stone <hstone@hillaryclinton.com>
Sent: Sun, Oct 4, 2015 3:24 pm
Subject: Re: BS and guns
Circling back around on guns as a follow up to the Friday morning
discussion: the Today show has indicated they definitely plan to ask bout
guns, and so to have the discussion be more of a news event than her
previous times discussing guns, we are going to background reporters
tonight on a few of the specific proposals she would support as President -
universal background checks of course, but also closing the gun show
loophole by executive order and imposing manufacturer liability.
On Friday, October 2, 2015, John Anzalone <john@algpolling.com> wrote:
Here is the BS interview last night on tragedy/guns last night I referenced
on the call where he punts on gun manufacturer liability. He also keeps
using the term “sensible” gun legislation...
I guess that's a bad thing to the Hillary camp. Wonder why.
Here is what gets me, the Dems are worried about the wealthy getting tax breaks with Donald Trump's proposed tax plan, yet if Hillary Clinton wins the country will the be run by all of her rich "pay to play" friends who have supported her campaign and donated large sums of money to the Clinton Foundation. Hillary will tell you what you want to hear, but she will not be able to act on her promises, because is owned by wealthy donors and Wall Street. She will do nothing for the middle class, please think carefully before voting for this two-faced puppet.
Yes. She is owned by Wall St, she is owned by those who pay people to push the agenda for globalization, and she is owned by Saudi Arabia who supports and funds ISIS.
That any fool would come here and say that's not important is mind blowing.
You do realize that for the last five or six pages of this thread you have essentially been talking to yourself, right?
And this is why:
But if it makes you happy to talk to yourself, by all means carry on...
It's obvious that you, the mainstream media, and many others feel Trump's comments from 11 years ago are more important than the Clinton's ongoing corruption and Hillary admitting in speeches that she intentionally mishandled sensitive national security information. I accept she's going to be the next prez. Still, there's a certain perverse fascination in watching the depths people like you go to in defending her, and him.
It's obvious that you, the mainstream media, and many others feel Trump's comments from 11 years ago are more important than the Clinton's ongoing corruption and Hillary admitting in speeches that she intentionally mishandled sensitive national security information. I accept she's going to be the next prez. Still, there's a certain perverse fascination in watching the depths people like you go to in defending her, and him.
The right wing and Hillary Clinton:
WOLF!!
(Oops, sorry, there's not really any wolf.)
WOLF!!!!!
(Oh, sorry, there's not really any wolf.)
WOLF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Honest, this time there really is a WOLF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why won't you believe me?
(Well, okay, there's not really a wolf this time, either, but I swear, NEXT TIME there WILL be.)
That is why no one outside of the cult is reading this thread. We've heard it for 25 years, and guess what? There is never a wolf.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I find these leaks very interesting!
