THE Recount Thread (votes, thought, Democrats, liberals)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It is a bad joke that keeps being told. The democrats look sad today. Jill Stein makes the democrats look stupid with recounts that are resoundingly cheapening their party.
When a recount is made, it isn't just about the number of votes that show up. It also includes an examination of the voting process, that might expose any hacking or tampering that was done. Many of the Trumpists here seem to have a fear of what might be revealed by the ongoing recounts. Their team scored, it went up on the board and they seemed to win the game and do not want the play to be reviewed.
I suppose that's why the recount thus far has proven to be in Trump's favor. If there is any reason why Republicans don't like the idea of a recount when it's obviously a waste of time, it's because Dems are notorious for magically finding several thousand votes, always to the democrats favor just sitting in the trunk of someone's car or in a file cabinet in someone's basement. Dems have an unfavorable reputation and rightly so of finding votes out of the blue sky, until their candidate takes the lead. Voting corruption has always been the Dems ace card especially in large cities. That's why they fight tooth and nail not to have voter I.D. It's no secret.
When a recount is made, it isn't just about the number of votes that show up. It also includes an examination of the voting process, that might expose any hacking or tampering that was done. Many of the Trumpists here seem to have a fear of what might be revealed by the ongoing recounts. Their team scored, it went up on the board and they seemed to win the game and do not want the play to be reviewed.
Umm, you do this when there is a reasonable suspicion of evidence of that not to double check.
There is no evidence of it, no cause.
"Anyone not willing to accept the results of an election is a danger to democracy.” - Hillary Clinton.
The irony is the bond is precisely so that voters don't foot the bill for the recount, rather the candidate does. But, leftists always want someone else to pay I guess.
Really?
Seems to me that lefty's and righty's both want the same things, good schools, safe neighborhoods, good roads, clean water, clean air to breath.
The difference being is that righty's think you can have all those things plus tax cuts.
When a recount is made, it isn't just about the number of votes that show up. It also includes an examination of the voting process, that might expose any hacking or tampering that was done. Many of the Trumpists here seem to have a fear of what might be revealed by the ongoing recounts. Their team scored, it went up on the board and they seemed to win the game and do not want the play to be reviewed.
I didn't vote for Trump but I can plainly see by only doing this in states Trump won this was BS.
It costs $5m in Michigan and yet the state is moving forward. How much has she put up? Last I heard it was barely half a mil. What gives?
The state is suing to stop the recount as Stein only had to pay just under $1 Million of that $5 Million total in cost. Our attorney general is arguing that tax payers shouldn't have to pick up the tabs of $ 4 Million in a political stunt that won't change the outcome.
** well the quote I put may not be immortalized in Youtube videos, but it was said during the campaign trail.
I wonder how the Conspiracy Theorists are feeling now that Hil can't back the new NWO. Zeitgeist-style.
Last edited by MAcapulco; 12-04-2016 at 07:23 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.