Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Did Hillary Clinton have anything to do with Stein's Fund for Recount? Multiple Choice Poll
Sure. "and" She secretly donated to the fund 54 31.40%
Sure she did. Still being Crooked-Hillary 81 47.09%
No Way! 24 13.95%
The Russians had something to do with it. 2 1.16%
The election was hacked for sure, right? 4 2.33%
The Donaters to Stein's fund are about to get ripped off $$$$ Burned! 39 22.67%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 172. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 12-04-2016, 06:27 AM
 
27,146 posts, read 15,318,187 times
Reputation: 12072

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockside View Post
Jill Stein...stretching her 15 minutes of fame into 30.




Stretching it into infamy is more like it.

 
Old 12-04-2016, 06:29 AM
 
Location: Florida
33,571 posts, read 18,161,091 times
Reputation: 15551
It is a bad joke that keeps being told. The democrats look sad today. Jill Stein makes the democrats look stupid with recounts that are resoundingly cheapening their party.
 
Old 12-04-2016, 06:30 AM
 
17,342 posts, read 11,281,227 times
Reputation: 40979
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McDonald View Post
When a recount is made, it isn't just about the number of votes that show up. It also includes an examination of the voting process, that might expose any hacking or tampering that was done. Many of the Trumpists here seem to have a fear of what might be revealed by the ongoing recounts. Their team scored, it went up on the board and they seemed to win the game and do not want the play to be reviewed.
I suppose that's why the recount thus far has proven to be in Trump's favor. If there is any reason why Republicans don't like the idea of a recount when it's obviously a waste of time, it's because Dems are notorious for magically finding several thousand votes, always to the democrats favor just sitting in the trunk of someone's car or in a file cabinet in someone's basement. Dems have an unfavorable reputation and rightly so of finding votes out of the blue sky, until their candidate takes the lead. Voting corruption has always been the Dems ace card especially in large cities. That's why they fight tooth and nail not to have voter I.D. It's no secret.
 
Old 12-04-2016, 06:34 AM
 
27,146 posts, read 15,318,187 times
Reputation: 12072
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McDonald View Post
When a recount is made, it isn't just about the number of votes that show up. It also includes an examination of the voting process, that might expose any hacking or tampering that was done. Many of the Trumpists here seem to have a fear of what might be revealed by the ongoing recounts. Their team scored, it went up on the board and they seemed to win the game and do not want the play to be reviewed.




Umm, you do this when there is a reasonable suspicion of evidence of that not to double check.


There is no evidence of it, no cause.


"Anyone not willing to accept the results of an election is a danger to democracy.” - Hillary Clinton.
 
Old 12-04-2016, 06:38 AM
PDD
 
Location: The Sand Hills of NC
8,773 posts, read 18,389,033 times
Reputation: 12004
Quote:
Originally Posted by FJR1 View Post
No refunds suckers.

Jill Stein discontinues Pennsylvania recount, cites outrageous, shameful, unacceptable, antiquated law – twitchy.com



here comes the blame game.....



Stein got 0.8% or 48,912 votes lol.

The irony is the bond is precisely so that voters don't foot the bill for the recount, rather the candidate does. But, leftists always want someone else to pay I guess.
Really?

Seems to me that lefty's and righty's both want the same things, good schools, safe neighborhoods, good roads, clean water, clean air to breath.

The difference being is that righty's think you can have all those things plus tax cuts.

How is that working out for all of us?
 
Old 12-04-2016, 06:39 AM
 
1,008 posts, read 487,439 times
Reputation: 493
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McDonald View Post
When a recount is made, it isn't just about the number of votes that show up. It also includes an examination of the voting process, that might expose any hacking or tampering that was done. Many of the Trumpists here seem to have a fear of what might be revealed by the ongoing recounts. Their team scored, it went up on the board and they seemed to win the game and do not want the play to be reviewed.
I didn't vote for Trump but I can plainly see by only doing this in states Trump won this was BS.
 
Old 12-04-2016, 06:41 AM
 
27,146 posts, read 15,318,187 times
Reputation: 12072
Quote:
Originally Posted by PDD View Post
Really?

Seems to me that lefty's and righty's both want the same things, good schools, safe neighborhoods, good roads, clean water, clean air to breath.

The difference being is that righty's think you can have all those things plus tax cuts.

How is that working out for all of us?




All the while leftists keep throwing good money after bad with no good result.......continually.
 
Old 12-04-2016, 06:47 AM
 
26,497 posts, read 15,074,947 times
Reputation: 14644
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyRider View Post
It costs $5m in Michigan and yet the state is moving forward. How much has she put up? Last I heard it was barely half a mil. What gives?
The state is suing to stop the recount as Stein only had to pay just under $1 Million of that $5 Million total in cost. Our attorney general is arguing that tax payers shouldn't have to pick up the tabs of $ 4 Million in a political stunt that won't change the outcome.

We'll see what happens.
 
Old 12-04-2016, 06:52 AM
 
1,180 posts, read 778,147 times
Reputation: 538
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesjuke View Post
Exactly.


This lunatic has no standing whatsoever to be asking for this anyway.


So. Surely.. The Courts will deny her request, then?
 
Old 12-04-2016, 06:56 AM
 
1,180 posts, read 778,147 times
Reputation: 538
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesjuke View Post
Umm, you do this when there is a reasonable suspicion of evidence of that not to double check.


There is no evidence of it, no cause.


"Anyone not willing to accept the results of an election is a danger to democracy.” - Hillary Clinton.
"Anyone not willing to accept the results of an election is a danger to democracy.” - Hillary Clinton.

I thought it was:

"Anyone saying they will not accept the results of the election makes a direct threat to the United States of America." - Hillary Clinton


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTLXwPrEFtU

And here is more.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCXRbnRJTBM

** well the quote I put may not be immortalized in Youtube videos, but it was said during the campaign trail.

I wonder how the Conspiracy Theorists are feeling now that Hil can't back the new NWO. Zeitgeist-style.

Last edited by MAcapulco; 12-04-2016 at 07:23 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top