Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Seems like Stein wants to make the Federal govt be a scapegoat... she is trying to push the PA recount to the federal court which would push it back to the state court... she is trying to blame someone else other than admitting she stolen from everyone, now that it exploded in her face... too bad people aren't that dumb Stein... Merry Christmas...
It's probably going to go about like everyone figured. Some votes will get added and some subtracted and the net change in the vote tally will be negligible. Here's the results of day three:
Biggest movers for the day:
Trump gained a net of 18 votes in Shawano County.
Clinton gained 14 votes in Manitowoc County.
Johnson Gained 12 votes in Menominee County.
Stein gained 17 votes in Menominee County.
We may come away from this process with WI election officials under greater scrutiny since they clearly did blunder in a number of cases. They just didn't blunder in any decidedly partisan way. If you're sitting on the edge of your seat hoping and praying that all or even most of the mistakes were pro-Trump and anti-Hillary you'll be disappointed. If you're hoping that mistakes will come in increments of 1000+ votes, that they'll all be mistakes that went against Hillary and that their correction will hand victory to Hillary Clinton, you'll most definitely be disappointed.
She claims on twitter to be filing the federal lawsuit on "constitutional" grounds as people "deserve answers" What is this crock pot talking about? No constitutional basis exists to support a recount based on deranged hunches that the Russians came and hacked the system
The irony is the bond is precisely so that voters don't foot the bill for the recount, rather the candidate does. But, leftists always want someone else to pay I guess.
Exactly.
This lunatic has no standing whatsoever to be asking for this anyway.
The irony is the bond is precisely so that voters don't foot the bill for the recount, rather the candidate does. But, leftists always want someone else to pay I guess.
Pennsylvania voter here! for Donald Trump.
Those living in the cities on the edge are in their own little world and have no clue the economic disparity of everyone else.
When a recount is made, it isn't just about the number of votes that show up. It also includes an examination of the voting process, that might expose any hacking or tampering that was done. Many of the Trumpists here seem to have a fear of what might be revealed by the ongoing recounts. Their team scored, it went up on the board and they seemed to win the game and do not want the play to be reviewed.
Does that mean you feel that there should always be recounts everywhere for each election?
When a recount is made, it isn't just about the number of votes that show up. It also includes an examination of the voting process, that might expose any hacking or tampering that was done. Many of the Trumpists here seem to have a fear of what might be revealed by the ongoing recounts. Their team scored, it went up on the board and they seemed to win the game and do not want the play to be reviewed.
No, a recount is just that, a physical recount, if possible, of the ballots cast. What you're talking about is an audit which takes months verifying voter eligibility, polling location procedures and ballot security.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.