Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Did Hillary Clinton have anything to do with Stein's Fund for Recount? Multiple Choice Poll
Sure. "and" She secretly donated to the fund 54 31.40%
Sure she did. Still being Crooked-Hillary 81 47.09%
No Way! 24 13.95%
The Russians had something to do with it. 2 1.16%
The election was hacked for sure, right? 4 2.33%
The Donaters to Stein's fund are about to get ripped off $$$$ Burned! 39 22.67%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 172. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 12-04-2016, 06:06 AM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,861,848 times
Reputation: 9283

Advertisements

Seems like Stein wants to make the Federal govt be a scapegoat... she is trying to push the PA recount to the federal court which would push it back to the state court... she is trying to blame someone else other than admitting she stolen from everyone, now that it exploded in her face... too bad people aren't that dumb Stein... Merry Christmas...

 
Old 12-04-2016, 06:06 AM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,738,099 times
Reputation: 6594
It's probably going to go about like everyone figured. Some votes will get added and some subtracted and the net change in the vote tally will be negligible. Here's the results of day three:

WBAY - Recount results – Day Three - December 3, 2016

Biggest movers for the day:
Trump gained a net of 18 votes in Shawano County.
Clinton gained 14 votes in Manitowoc County.
Johnson Gained 12 votes in Menominee County.
Stein gained 17 votes in Menominee County.

We may come away from this process with WI election officials under greater scrutiny since they clearly did blunder in a number of cases. They just didn't blunder in any decidedly partisan way. If you're sitting on the edge of your seat hoping and praying that all or even most of the mistakes were pro-Trump and anti-Hillary you'll be disappointed. If you're hoping that mistakes will come in increments of 1000+ votes, that they'll all be mistakes that went against Hillary and that their correction will hand victory to Hillary Clinton, you'll most definitely be disappointed.
 
Old 12-04-2016, 06:07 AM
 
649 posts, read 316,704 times
Reputation: 364
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoot N Annie View Post
I wonder if she's a moaner or a screamer.....
She probably just lays there & picks her nose fantasizing about being somebody .
 
Old 12-04-2016, 06:07 AM
 
1,180 posts, read 778,609 times
Reputation: 538
Quote:
Originally Posted by prospectheightsresident View Post
She claims on twitter to be filing the federal lawsuit on "constitutional" grounds as people "deserve answers" What is this crock pot talking about? No constitutional basis exists to support a recount based on deranged hunches that the Russians came and hacked the system
She is not an "aggrieved candidate."
 
Old 12-04-2016, 06:13 AM
 
27,154 posts, read 15,327,118 times
Reputation: 12075
Quote:
Originally Posted by FJR1 View Post
No refunds suckers.

Jill Stein discontinues Pennsylvania recount, cites outrageous, shameful, unacceptable, antiquated law – twitchy.com



here comes the blame game.....



Stein got 0.8% or 48,912 votes lol.

The irony is the bond is precisely so that voters don't foot the bill for the recount, rather the candidate does. But, leftists always want someone else to pay I guess.


Exactly.


This lunatic has no standing whatsoever to be asking for this anyway.
 
Old 12-04-2016, 06:15 AM
 
6,822 posts, read 6,637,839 times
Reputation: 3770
Quote:
Originally Posted by FJR1 View Post
No refunds suckers.

Jill Stein discontinues Pennsylvania recount, cites outrageous, shameful, unacceptable, antiquated law – twitchy.com



here comes the blame game.....



Stein got 0.8% or 48,912 votes lol.

The irony is the bond is precisely so that voters don't foot the bill for the recount, rather the candidate does. But, leftists always want someone else to pay I guess.
Pennsylvania voter here! for Donald Trump.

Those living in the cities on the edge are in their own little world and have no clue the economic disparity of everyone else.

Heads are in the sand.
 
Old 12-04-2016, 06:21 AM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,627,209 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McDonald View Post
When a recount is made, it isn't just about the number of votes that show up. It also includes an examination of the voting process, that might expose any hacking or tampering that was done. Many of the Trumpists here seem to have a fear of what might be revealed by the ongoing recounts. Their team scored, it went up on the board and they seemed to win the game and do not want the play to be reviewed.
Does that mean you feel that there should always be recounts everywhere for each election?
 
Old 12-04-2016, 06:24 AM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,627,209 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Logan Savage View Post
She probably just lays there & picks her nose fantasizing about being somebody .
Most likely a character from Avatar.
 
Old 12-04-2016, 06:26 AM
 
27,154 posts, read 15,327,118 times
Reputation: 12075
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
She raised $7 Million but can post a $1 Million bond?

Smells like fraud to me.




Yep, she raised the money for what now?
 
Old 12-04-2016, 06:27 AM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,425 posts, read 60,608,674 times
Reputation: 61041
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve McDonald View Post
When a recount is made, it isn't just about the number of votes that show up. It also includes an examination of the voting process, that might expose any hacking or tampering that was done. Many of the Trumpists here seem to have a fear of what might be revealed by the ongoing recounts. Their team scored, it went up on the board and they seemed to win the game and do not want the play to be reviewed.
No, a recount is just that, a physical recount, if possible, of the ballots cast. What you're talking about is an audit which takes months verifying voter eligibility, polling location procedures and ballot security.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top