Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Did Hillary Clinton have anything to do with Stein's Fund for Recount? Multiple Choice Poll
Sure. "and" She secretly donated to the fund 54 31.40%
Sure she did. Still being Crooked-Hillary 81 47.09%
No Way! 24 13.95%
The Russians had something to do with it. 2 1.16%
The election was hacked for sure, right? 4 2.33%
The Donaters to Stein's fund are about to get ripped off $$$$ Burned! 39 22.67%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 172. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 12-03-2016, 06:15 PM
 
17,342 posts, read 11,277,677 times
Reputation: 40973

Advertisements

Fox News reported an hour ago that the Green Party has suspend recount efforts in PA. Is it now officially over?

 
Old 12-03-2016, 06:18 PM
 
Location: The Lakes Region
3,074 posts, read 4,725,923 times
Reputation: 2377
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post
So feel free to go ahead and provide some evidence they did.
Feel free to provide some evidence they didn't or are you claiming they are
perfectly honest upright illegal aliens ?
 
Old 12-03-2016, 06:21 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,275,432 times
Reputation: 34058
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pawporri View Post
Feel free to provide some evidence they didn't or are you claiming they are
perfectly honest upright illegal aliens ?
you claimed that they can vote, you made an implication that they did vote, the way that works in a forum is that YOU prove your claim, you don't put it of on a person who questions your remark
 
Old 12-03-2016, 06:24 PM
 
Location: The Lakes Region
3,074 posts, read 4,725,923 times
Reputation: 2377
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
you claimed that they can vote, you made an implication that they did vote, the way that works in a forum is that YOU prove your claim, you don't put it of on a person who questions your remark
That's how I roll.......Looks like a mute point now from reading the previous posts - from today....
 
Old 12-03-2016, 06:29 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,275,432 times
Reputation: 34058
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pawporri View Post
That's how I roll.......Looks like a mute point now from reading the previous posts - from today....
mute...or moot
 
Old 12-03-2016, 06:32 PM
 
Location: The Lakes Region
3,074 posts, read 4,725,923 times
Reputation: 2377
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
mute...or moot
Good one........
 
Old 12-03-2016, 06:40 PM
 
Location: Free State of Florida
4,958 posts, read 2,237,018 times
Reputation: 5839
Quote:
Originally Posted by WannaliveinGreenville View Post
Hrmmm...she collected $8 MILLION dollars but does not have $1 Million for the deadline? (or what exactly is the problem here?) Where, pray-tell is ALL the money? I see a pattern here..... She collects but does nothing to help her saddened Queen Hillary voters. I bet they are finally opening their eyes to her and Hillary's evil-doings...
According to her website, her recount effort has raised $6,963,044.06. I understand that she wired $3,500,000.00 to Wisconsin election officials so that leaves $3,463,044.06 that should be used towards the recount effort. I'm sure there are some attorney's fees and what not, but she is actually stating that she cannot afford the $1,000,000.00 bond that the Pennsylvania court requires? What in the hell did she raise the money for if it wasn't going to be used towards the recount effort?

I sincerely hope there is an investigation into Jill Stein's fundraising. It appears to me that she screwed over a lot of people.
 
Old 12-03-2016, 06:43 PM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,855,247 times
Reputation: 9283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad_Jasper View Post
According to her website, her recount effort has raised $6,963,044.06. I understand that she wired $3,500,000.00 to Wisconsin election officials so that leaves $3,463,044.06 that should be used towards the recount effort. I'm sure there are some attorney's fees and what not, but she is actually stating that she cannot afford the $1,000,000.00 bond that the Pennsylvania court requires? What in the hell did she raise the money for if it wasn't going to be used towards the recount effort?

I sincerely hope there is an investigation into Jill Stein's fundraising. It appears to me that she screwed over a lot of people.
It's one million dollar BOND.... NOT cash.... which means it probably cost 20k cash to secure that bond... it's not a matter of not having enough... it's a matter of liberals are just stupid and can't figure out she walked away with a boatload of cash... Merry Christmas...
 
Old 12-03-2016, 06:52 PM
 
Location: Free State of Florida
4,958 posts, read 2,237,018 times
Reputation: 5839
Quote:
Originally Posted by evilnewbie View Post
It's one million dollar BOND.... NOT cash.... which means it probably cost 20k cash to secure that bond... it's not a matter of not having enough... it's a matter of liberals are just stupid and can't figure out she walked away with a boatload of cash... Merry Christmas...
I understand that. There was no reason for her to think that the Pennsylvania and Michigan recount efforts wouldn't require a similar amount of funds as Wisconsin. She's asking for 9.5 million. For all the reasons to to drop the recount effort.

Stein didn't have a problem dropping 3.5 million on a Wisconsin recount but 1 million (bond, which is required by law) is too much?

Last edited by Mad_Jasper; 12-03-2016 at 07:29 PM..
 
Old 12-03-2016, 07:08 PM
 
1,008 posts, read 487,346 times
Reputation: 493
Default Jill Stein Drops recount Effort in Pennslyvania

No refunds suckers.

Jill Stein discontinues Pennsylvania recount, cites outrageous, shameful, unacceptable, antiquated law – twitchy.com

Quote:
It was a great fundraiser for the Green Party, but Jill Stein’s recount effort seems to have reached a dead end. News broke Saturday evening that Stein would discontinue her recount effort in Pennsylvania after failing to post a $1 million bond mandated by a Commonwealth Court judge.
here comes the blame game.....

Quote:
Stein, who so far has raised $7 million for the recount effort in three states, said Saturday that “the judge’s outrageous demand that voters pay such an exorbitant figure is a shameful, unacceptable barrier to democratic participation,” calling it “another sign that Pennsylvania’s antiquated election law is stacked against voters.”
Stein got 0.8% or 48,912 votes lol.

The irony is the bond is precisely so that voters don't foot the bill for the recount, rather the candidate does. But, leftists always want someone else to pay I guess.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top