Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This prediction reminds me of the prediction that the GOP will never allow Trump to be nominated.
LOL!!!! And we all know how that turned out. It's fun watching Dems say trump is messing up when he has yet to take office. Their desperate for a Trump failure to happen, but we all know their track record on predictions.
Okay I'm not sure why I didn't see it earlier, but the only conceivable motive is obvious now: Preventing PA, MI and WI from sending their electors and having any voice whatsoever in the Electoral College. It is the only reason for waiting until the very last possible moment to issue the request.
I wonder if any of the states will be wise enough to just tell her "No" ... if they even can.
All 50 states are likely to review the entire recount process after this to avoid it being used as a tool of political games like we're seeing now.
Jill Stein’s running mate has denounced the Green Party nominee’s push for an election recount, calling it a “potentially dangerous move.”
Speaking with CNN, Ajamu Baraka said he actually warned Stein that the recount effort “would be seen as carrying the water for the Democrats.”
Indeed, several people online have pointed out that Jill Stein – despite her claims of neutrality – is only calling for recounts in states that Democrats lost.
Makes you wonder why Stein wastes her time. Maybe it's to put her face ob TV.
She's got more air time since the election than she did all through it. Besides, if it was such a good idea, why didn't Hilary ask for it? One more thing. Everybody wants to see "evidence" than illegals voted but we don't need to see anything to send thousands of state workers for months on a wild goose chase. This costs Wisconsin $6m and yet all Stein has to put up is $1m. How does that work?
Makes you wonder why Stein wastes her time. Maybe it's to put her face ob TV.
She's got more air time since the election than she did all through it. Besides, if it was such a good idea, why didn't Hilary ask for it? One more thing. Everybody wants to see "evidence" than illegals voted but we don't need to see anything to send thousands of state workers for months on a wild goose chase. This costs Wisconsin $6m and yet all Stein has to put up is $1m. How does that work?
She's got more air time since the election than she did all through it. Besides, if it was such a good idea, why didn't Hilary ask for it? One more thing. Everybody wants to see "evidence" than illegals voted but we don't need to see anything to send thousands of state workers for months on a wild goose chase. This costs Wisconsin $6m and yet all Stein has to put up is $1m. How does that work?
How will a recount show if illegals voted?? Ballots don't have names on them. They are re-counting votes, not scanning the registers looking for mistakes.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
